Testing the EFQM model as a framework to measure a company’s procurement performance

References

• Alfaro, J. J., Ortiz, A. A., & Poler, R. R. (2007). Performance measurement system for business processes. Production Planning & Control, 18(8), 641–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balbastre-Benavent, F., & Canet-Giner, M. T. (2011). The strategy formation process in the EFQM Excellence Model: A critical review and new perspectives. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22(7), 727–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belvedere, V. (2014). Defining the scope of service operations management: An investigation on the factors that affect the span of responsibility of the operations department in service companies. Production Planning & Control, 25(6), 447–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belvedere, V., & Gallmann, F. (2014). The alignment among competitive strategy, operations improvement priorities and manufacturing and logistics performance measurement systems. Evidence from a case-based study. In Models and Methods in economics and management science (pp. 221–241). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of model to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 400–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bititci, U. S., Firat, S. O., & Garengo, P. (2013). How to compare performances of firms operating in different sectors? Production Planning & Control, 24(12), 1032–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bou-Llusar, J., Escrig-Tena, A. B., Roca-Puig, V., & Beltrán-Martín, I. (2009). An empirical assessment of the EFQM excellence model: Evaluation as a TQM framework relative to the MBNQA Model. Journal of Operations Management, 27(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, M., Mills, J., Wilcox, M., Neely, A., & Platts, K. (2000). Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20(7), 754–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brignall, S., & Ballantine, J. (1996). Performance measurement in service businesses revisited. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 7(1), 6–31.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24(4), 445–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo-Mora, A., Leal, A., & Roldán, J. L. (2005). Relationships between the EFQM model criteria: A study in Spanish universities. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 16(6), 741–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo-Mora, A., Picón-Berjoyo, A., Ruiz-Moreno, C., & Cauzo-Bottala, L. (2015). Contextual and mediation analysis between TQM critical factors and organisational results in the EFQM excellence model framework. International Journal of Production Research, 53(7), 2186–2201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAPS Research (2014). Cross-industry report of standard benchmarks. Tempe: Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, A. S., & Pearson, J. N. (2002). The impact of purchasing and supplier involvement on strategic purchasing and its impact on firm’s performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(9/10), 1032–1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, P. L., Monczka, R. M., & Mosconi, T. (2005a). Looking at the future of supply measurement. Supply Chain Management Review, 9(9), 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, P. L., Monczka, R. M., & Mosconi, T. (2005b). Strategic performance measurement for purchasing and supply. Tempe: CAPS, Center for Strategic Supply Research.
   Google Scholar
• Dumond, E. J. (1991). Performance measurement and decision making in a purchasing environment. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 27(2), 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dumond, E. J. (1994). Making best use of performance measures and information. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(9), 16–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, L., Murphy, D. J., & Pearson, J. N. (2002). Purchasing performance evaluation: With data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 8(3), 123–134.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological methods, 12(1), 1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFQM. (2013). An overview of the EFQM excellence model. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ellram, L. M., & Liu, B. (2002). The financial impact of supply management. Supply Chain Management Review, 6(6), 30–37.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., Brignall, T. J., Silvestro, R., & Voss, C. (1991). Performance measurement in service businesses. London: CIMA.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez Gómez, J., Martínez-Costa, M., & Martínez-Lorente, Á. R. (2011). A critical evaluation of the EFQM model. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 28(5), 484–502.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez Gómez, J., Martínez Costa, M., & Martínez Lorente, Á. R. (2015). EFQM excellence model and TQM: An empirical comparison. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 26, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzàlez-Benito, J. (2007). A theory of purchasing’s contribution to business performance. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 901–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grando, A., Tapiero, C. S., & Belvedere, V. (2006). Operational performances in manufacturing and service industries: Conceptual framework and research agenda. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 9(2), 110–126.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, H. H. (1967). Modern factor analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hensley, R. L. (1999). A review of operations and management studies using scale development techniques. Journal of Operations Management, 17(3), 343–358.
   Google Scholar
• Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Marimon, F., & Casadesús, M. (2012). An empirical study of the relationships within the categories of the EFQM model. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(5–6), 523–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hides, M. T., Davies, J., & Jackson, S. (2004). Implementation of EFQM excellence model self-assessment in the UK higher education sector – Lessons learned from other sectors. The TQM Magazine, 16(3), 194–201.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, E., Maucher, D., Kotula, M., & Kreienbrink, O. (2014). Performance measurement and incentive systems in purchasing. More than just savings. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, M. P., Kathuria, R., & Porth, S. J. (2003). Alignment of strategic priorities and performance: An integration of operations and strategic management perspectives. Journal of Operations Management, 21(3), 353–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2000). The strategy focused organization – How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, D., & McAdam, R. (2002). The role of the business excellence model in operational and strategic decision making. Management Decision, 40(1), 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Loehlin, J. C. (1998). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, R. L., & Cross, K. F. (1991). Measure up – The essential guide to measuring business performance. London: Mandarin.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, R., & Bailey, B. (2002). Business performance measures and alignment impact on strategy. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(9), 972–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, J. (2004). Supply chain management in a global economy. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 15(5–6), 841–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, A., Devaraj, S., & Vaidyanathan, G. (2013). Capability hierarchy in electronic procurement and procurement process performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 31(6), 376–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, A., Konana, P., & Barua, A. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of internet use in procurement: An empirical investigation of U.S. manufacturing firms. Information Systems Research, 18(1), 103–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabitz, U., Klazinga, N., & Walburg, J. A. N. (2000). The EFQM excellence model: European and Dutch experiences with the EFQM approach in health care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 12(3), 191–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, A. (1999). The performance measurement revolution: Why now and what next? International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19(2), 205–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, A. (2005). The evolution of performance measurement research: Developments in the last decade and a research agenda for the next. International Journal Of Operations & Production Management, 25(12), 1264–1277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, A. (2007). Business performance measurement: Unifying theory and integrating practice (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design. A literature review and a research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Papke-Shields, K. E., & Malhotra, M. K. (2001). Assessing the impact of the manufacturing executive’s role on business performance through strategic alignment. Journal of Operations Management, 19(1), 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reihanifard, P., Aminilari, M., Moghadam, R. A., Vahdat, D., & Mozaffari, S. (2012). Providing a pattern to evaluate CRM systems based on EFQM model in SMEs. Advanced Materials Research, 463–464, 1141–1146.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, L., & Dale, B. G. (2000). Self-assessment using the business excellence model: A study of practice and process. International Journal of Production Economics, 66(20), 241–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusjan, B. (2005). Usefulness of the EFQM excellence model: Theoretical explanation of some conceptual and methodological issues. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 16(3), 363–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson, P., & Nilsson, L. E. (2002). Self-assessment practices in large organisations: Experiences from using the EFQM excellence model. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19(1), 10–23.
   Google Scholar
• Santos-Vijande, M. L., & Álvarez-González, L. I. (2009). TQM’s contribution to marketing implementation and firm’s competitiveness. Total Quality Management, 20(2), 171–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenherr, T., Modi, S. B., Benton, W. C., Carter, C. R., Choi, T. Y., Larson, P. D., & Wagner, S. M. (2012). Research opportunities in purchasing and supply management. International Journal of Production Research, 50(16), 4556–4579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, J., Moser, R., & Henke, M. (2012). Multidimensional supply performance framework: A conceptual development and empirical analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 138(1), 26–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestro, R., Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., & Voss, C. (1992). Towards a classification of service processes. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 3(3), 62–75.
   Google Scholar
• Skipworth, H., Godsell, J., Wong, C. Y., Saghiri, S., & Julien, D. (2015). Supply chain alignment for improved business performance: An empirical study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(5), 511–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez, E., Roldán, J. L., & Calvo-Mora, A. (2014). A structural analysis of the EFQM model: An assessment of the mediating role of process management. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 15(5), 862–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, S. M., Grosse-Ruyken, P. T., & Erhun, F. (2012). The link between supply chain fit and financial performance of the firm. Journal of Operations Management, 30(4), 340–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Weele, A. J. (1994). Purchasing management. Analysis, planning and practice. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• van Weele, A. J., & Raaij, E. M. (2014). The future of purchasing and supply management research: About relevance and rigor. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(1), 56–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisner, J. D., & Fawcett, S. E. (1991). Linking firm strategy to operating decisions through performance measurement. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 32(3), 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (1934). The method of path coefficients. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 5(3), 161–215.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, N., Sushil, N. A., & Sagar, M. (2013). Performance measurement and management frameworks. Research trends of the last two decades. Business Process Management Journal, 19(6), 947–971.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, N., Sushil, N. A., & Sagar, M. (2014). Revisiting performance measurement and management: Deriving linkages with strategic management theories. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 15(2), 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, F., & Foerstl, K. (2014). A meta-analysis of the ‘purchasing and supply management practice – performance link’. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(3), 37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar