Impact of data-driven decision-making in Lean Six Sigma: an empirical analysis

References

• Akinbobola, O. I., & Adeleke, A. A. (2016). External variables as antecedents of users perception in virtual library usage. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 11, 73–87.
   Google Scholar
• Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albliwi, S. A., Albliwi, S. A., Antony, J., Antony, J., Arshed, N., Arshed, N., & Ghadge, A. (2017). Implementation of Lean Six Sigma in Saudi Arabian organisations: Findings from a survey. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(4), 508–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albliwi, S. A., Antony, J., & Lim, S. A. H. (2015). A systematic review of Lean Six Sigma for the manufacturing industry. Business Process Management Journal, 21(3), 665–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambler, T. (2000). Marketing metrics. Business Strategy Review, 11(2), 59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Antony, J. (2004). Six sigma in the UK service organisations: Results from a pilot survey. Managerial Auditing Journal, 19(8), 1006–1013.
   Google Scholar
• Antony, J., Krishan, N., Cullen, D., & Kumar, M. (2012). Lean Six Sigma for higher education institutions (HEIs) challenges, barriers, success factors, tools/techniques. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(8), 940–948.
   Google Scholar
• Arpaci, I. (2016). Understanding and predicting students’ intention to use mobile cloud storage services. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 150–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, R. J. (2010). Getting started using marketing metrics. White Paper, Marketing Metrics Handbook.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt, G. D. (2000). Organizing knowledge in the knowledge development cycle. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1), 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Boonsiritomachai, W., McGrath, M., & Burgess, S. (2014). A research framework for the adoption of business intelligence by Small and Medium-sized enterprises. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Seaanz Conference in Small Enterprise Association of Australia and New Zealand, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, M., & Florin, J. (2003). Examining the role of innovation diffusion factors on the implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 4(3), 205–225.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B., Chui, M., & Manyika, J. (2011). Are you ready for the era of ‘big data’? McKinsey Quarterly, 4(1), 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones, A., & Hubona, G. S. (2006). The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 706–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S. C., & Tung, F. C. (2008). An empirical investigation of students’ behavioral intentions to use the online learning course websites. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 71–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., Chiang, R. H., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1165–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L. D., & Tan, J. (2004). Technology adaptation in E-commerce: Key determinants of virtual stores acceptance. European Management Journal, 22(1), 74–86.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. H., & Ambler, T. (2001). Marketing performance measurement: Evolution of research and practice. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 3(2–4), 231–244.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H. (2006). Competing on analytics. Harvard Business Review, 84(1), 98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology; system characteristics, user perceptions, and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 38, 475–487.
   Google Scholar
• De Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 260–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). San Diego: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). Hobeken,NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit constructs. Information & Management, 36(1), 9–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016). Enablers of Six Sigma: Contextual framework and its empirical validation. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(11–12), 1346–1372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, D. (2007). Lean and Six Sigma: The same or different. Management Services, 51(3), 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1980). Attitudes and voting behavior: An application of the theory of reasoned action. In Stephenson G. M., & Davis J. M. (Eds.), Progress in applied social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 253–313). London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. J. (2000). Social pressures on organizational website adoption. Human Communication Research, 26(4), 618–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furterer, S. L. (2016). Lean Six Sigma in service: Applications and case studies. Boca Raton,FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garbelli, M. E. (2008). Market-driven management, competitive markets, and performance metrics. Retrieved from http://symphonya.unimib.it/article/view/2008.1.07garbelli.
   Google Scholar
• Godoe, P., & Johansen, T. (2012). Understanding adoption of new technologies: Technology readiness and technology acceptance as an integrated concept. Journal of European Psychology Students, 3, 38–52.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E., & Neale, M. A. (2003). Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27, 265–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruca, T. S., & Rego, L. L. (2005). Customer satisfaction, cash flow, and shareholder value. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 115–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyung Kim, M., and A. S.Mattila. (2013). Does a surprise strategy need words? The effect of explanations for a surprise strategy on customer delight and expectations. Journal of Services Marketing, 27(5), 361–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, R. J., & Sohal, A. (2012). A conceptual model for the successful deployment of Lean Six Sigma. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 29(1), 54–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hoerl, R. W., & Gardner, M. M. (2010). Lean Six Sigma, creativity, and innovation. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 1(1), 30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, W., & Zhu, K. (2006). Migrating to internet-based e-commerce: Factors affecting e-commerce adoption and migration at the firm level. Information & Management, 43(2), 204–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, W. Y., Lin, C. I., & Pan, M. J. (2009). Business strategies and the adoption of ERP: Evidence from Taiwan's communications industry. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(8), 1084–1098.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffery, M. (2010). Data-driven marketing: The 15 metrics everyone in marketing should know. Hoboken,NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Jugulum, R., & Samuel, P. (2010). Design for Lean Six Sigma: A holistic approach to design and innovation. New York,NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Park, Y., & Choi, J. (2017). A study on the adoption of IoT smart home service: Using value-based adoption model. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(9-10), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N. (2013). Using WarpPLS in E-collaboration studies: Descriptive statistics, settings. Interdisciplinary Applications of Electronic Collaboration Approaches and Technologies, 62, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Koronios, A., Lin, S., & Gao, J. (2005). ‘A data quality model for asset management in engineering organisations’. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on information quality (ICIQ 2005), 4–6 November, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 27–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kureshi, N., Qureshi, F., & Sajid, A. (2010). Current health of quality management practices in service sector SME – A case study of Pakistan. The TQM Journal, 22(3), 317–329.
   Google Scholar
• LaValle, S., Lesser, E., Shockley, R., Hopkins, M. S., & Kruschwitz, N. (2011). Big data, analytics and the path from insights to value. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2), 21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity I. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. J., & You, Y. Y. (2016). The influences of B2B service quality on the relationship satisfaction, brand performance and relationship performance – an application of the IMP interaction model. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(43), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Levitin, A. V., & Redman, T. C. (1998). Data as a resource: Properties, implications, and prescriptions. MIT Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 89.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E. D. F. R., & Ramos, L. F. P. (2017). Past, present and future of industry 4.0 – a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research, 55(12), 3609–3629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandinach, E. B., Honey, M., & Light, D. (2006, April). A theoretical framework for data-driven decision making. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2012). Big data: The management revolution: Exploiting vast new flows of information can radically improve your company’s performance. But first you will have to change your decision making culture. Harvard Business Review, 90(10), 61–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelson, H. (2000). Organizational architecture and success in the information technology industry. Management Science, 46(4), 513–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz, O., & Currim, I. S. (2013). What drives managerial use of marketing and financial metrics and does metric use affect performance of marketing-mix activities? Journal of Marketing, 77(2), 17–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näslund, D. (2008). Lean, six sigma and lean sigma: Fads or real process improvement methods? Business Process Management Journal, 14(3), 269–287.
   Google Scholar
• Neslin, S. A., & Shankar, V. (2009). Key issues in multichannel customer management: Current knowledge and future directions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(1), 70–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaou, A. I., & McKnight, D. H. (2006). Perceived information quality in data exchanges: Effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Information Systems Research, 17(4), 332–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, M. J., & Jang, W. Y. (2008). Determinants of the adoption of enterprise resource planning within the technology-organization-environment framework: Taiwan's communications industry. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(3), 94–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petzer, D. J., & Steyn, T. F. J. (2006). Customer retention: A theoretical perspective of service failure and service recovery in the hotel industry. Acta Commercial, 6(1), 162–172.
   Google Scholar
• Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y. K. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47(2), 222–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. (2013). Data science and its relationship to big data and data-driven decision making. Big Data, 1(1), 51–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psychogios, A. G., Atanasovski, J., & Tsironis, L. K. (2012). Lean Six Sigma in a service context: A multi-factor application approach in the telecommunications industry. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 29(1), 122–139.
   Google Scholar
• Ramamurthy, K. R., Sen, A., & Sinha, A. P. (2008). An empirical investigation of the key determinants of data warehouse adoption. Decision Support Systems, 44(4), 817–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, S., & Sarulatha, N. (2013). Big data: A marketer’s perspective of emerging marketing approach. International Journal of Management Research and Reviews, 3(5), 2872.
   Google Scholar
• Riggins, F. J., & Wamba, S. F. (2015 January 5–8). Research directions on the adoption, usage, and impact of the internet of things through the use of big data analytics. In 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Kauai, HI, USA (pp. 1531–1540). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2004). A prospective and retrospective look at the diffusion model. Journal of Health Communication, 9(S1), 13–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed, K. A., & Abdinnour-Helm, S. (2008). Examining the effects of information system characteristics and perceived usefulness on post-adoption usage of information systems. Information & Management, 45(6), 376–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahay, B. S., & Ranjan, J. (2008). Real-time business intelligence in supply chain analytics. Information Management & Computer Security, 16(1), 28–48.
   Google Scholar
• Snee, R. D. (2010). Lean Six Sigma – getting better all the time. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 1(1), 9–29.
   Google Scholar
• Sreedharan, V. R., Raju, R., Rajkanth, R., & Nagaraj, M. (2016). An empirical assessment of Lean Six Sigma awareness in manufacturing industries: Construct development and validation. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. Advance online publiation. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2016.1230470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreedharan, V. R., Raju, R., & Srivatsa Srinivas, S. (2017). A review of the quality evolution in various organisations. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(3–4), 351–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivas, S. S., & Sreedharan, V. R. (in press). Failure analysis of automobile spares in a manufacturing supply chain distribution centre using Six sigma DMAIC framework. International Journal of Services and Operations Management.
   Google Scholar
• Strong, D. M., Lee, Y. W., & Wang, R. Y. (1997). Data quality in context. Communications of the ACM, 40(5), 103–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thong, J. Y., Hong, W., & Tam, K. Y. (2002). Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(3), 215–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsironis, L. K., & Psychogios, A. G. (2016). Road towards Lean Six Sigma in service industry: A multi-factor integrated framework. Business Process Management Journal, 22(4), 812–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. A. (2001). A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 71–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D., & Morris, M. G. (2007). Dead or alive? The development, trajectory, and future of technology adoption research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vince, G. (2008). Lean six. Management Services, 52(1), 22–23.
   Google Scholar
• Vinodh, S., & Vimal, K. E. K. (2012). Thirty criteria based leanness assessment using fuzzy logic approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 60(9–12), 1185–1195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F. K., & Chen, K. S. (2010). Applying Lean Six Sigma and TRIZ methodology in banking services. Total Quality Management, 21(3), 301–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., & Xu, S. (2006). The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: A technology diffusion perspective on e-business. Management Science, 52(10), 1557–1576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar