1,124
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Being excellent teams: managing innovative climate, politics, and team performance

, , &

References

  • Accelerometer, A. G., & Pedometer, A. (2010). Measurement in physical education and exercise science. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 14(2), 130–136.
  • Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of empowering leader behaviors on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 945–955.
  • Akgun, A. E., Byrne, J. C., Keskin, H., & Lynn, G. S. (2006). Transactive memory system in new product development teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(1), 95–111.
  • Ali-Hassan, H., & Nevo, D. (2016). How social media can enhance access to information through transactive memory development. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(4), 185–212.
  • Allan, B. A., Douglass, R. P., Duffy, R. D., & McCarty, R. J. (2016). Meaningful work as a moderator of the relation between work stress and meaning in life. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(3), 429–440.
  • Allison, P. (2012, September 10). When can you safely ignore multicollinearity? Retrieved from http://www.statisticalhorizons.com/multicollinearity
  • Anand, V., Manz, C. C., & Glick, W. H. (1998). An organizational memory approach to information management. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 796–809.
  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223.
  • Barksdale, J. T., Ragan, E. D., & McCrickard, D. S. (2009). Easing team politics in agile usability: A concept mapping approach. The Proceedings of 2009 Agile Conference (AGILE2009), August 24–28, 2009, Chicago, IL, USA, pp. 19–25.
  • Baruch, Y., & Lin, C. P. (2012). All for one, one for all: Coopetition and virtual team performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 1155–1168.
  • Beranek, P., Klein, G., & Jiang, J. J. (2014). Building user engagement for successful software projects: Meaningfulness, safety, and availability. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(3), 1–20.
  • Best, K. C. (2012). Holistic leadership: A model for leader-member engagement and development. The Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 4(1), 1–19.
  • Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Borghoff, U. M., & Pareschi, R. (1998). Information technology for knowledge management. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • Brandon, D., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2004). Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization Science, 15(6), 633–644.
  • Byrne, Z. S. (2005). Fairness reduces the negative effects of organizational politics on turnover intentions, citizenship behavior and job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(2), 175–200.
  • Cardador, M. T., & Rupp, D. E. (2010). Organizational culture, multiple needs and the meaningfulness of work. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. P. M. Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson (Eds.), The handbook of organizational culture and climate (2nd ed., pp. 158–180). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Chang, S., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 178–184.
  • Chen, C. J., & Huang, J. W. (2007). How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management—The social interaction perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 27(2), 104–118.
  • Chen, C. J., Huang, J. W., & Hsiao, Y. C. (2010). Knowledge management and innovativeness: The role of organizational climate and structure. International Journal of Manpower, 31(8), 848–870.
  • Chen, C.-Y., Huang, H.-H., & Wey, S.-C. (2017). The mediating roles of differentiation strategy and learning orientation in the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance. Corporate Management Review, 37(1), 1–40.
  • Chiu, C. K., Joe, S. W., Lin, C. P., Wu, T. Y., & Yen, P. H. (2016). Being an excellent team: Understanding how politics influence team performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2016.1189823
  • Choi, S. Y., Lee, H., & Yoo, Y. (2010). The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: A field study. MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 855–870.
  • Chu, L. C. (2010). Flow experience of knowledge workers: A case study of a Taiwanese consultancy. Journal of International Management Studies, 5(2), 216–226.
  • Cockburn, A. (2004). Crystal clear: A human-powered methodology for small teams. Reading, MA: Pearson Education.
  • Collinson, S., & Wilson, D. C. (2006). Inertia in Japanese organizations: Knowledge management routines and failure to innovate. Organization Studies, 27(9), 1359–1387.
  • Conger, J. A. (1989). Leadership: The art of empowering others. Academy of Management Executive, 3(1), 17–24.
  • Cordery, J. L., Morrison, D., Wright, B. M., & Wall, T. D. (2010). The impact of autonomy and task uncertainty on team performance: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2/3), 240–258.
  • Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29.
  • de Os, W. P. (2013). Share, be creative, and perform: How team creativity mediates the relationship between transactive memory systems and team decision performance. Rotterdam,The Netherlands: Erasmus Universiteit.
  • Dirks, K. T. (2000). Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 1004–1012.
  • Drory, A. (1993). Perceived political climate and job attitudes. Organization Studies, 14(1), 59–71.
  • Dunegan, K. J., Tierney, P., & Duchon, D. (1992). Perceptions of an innovative climate: Examining the role of divisional affiliation, work group interaction, and leader/subordinate exchange. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 39(3), 227–236.
  • Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
  • Eidevall, K., & Leufstadius, C. (2014). Perceived meaningfulness of music and participation in a music group among young adults with physical disabilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(2), 130–142.
  • Elkins, T., & Keller, R. T. (2003). Leadership in research and development organizations: A literature review and conceptual framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), 587–606.
  • Engelmann, T., Kolodziej, R., & Hesse, F. W. (2014). Preventing undesirable effects of mutual trust and the development of skepticism in virtual groups by applying the knowledge and information awareness approach. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(2), 211–235.
  • Faraj, S., & Sproull, L. (2000). Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46(12), 1554–1568.
  • Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466–491.
  • Frazier, P., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115–134.
  • Glisson, C., & James, L. R. (2002). The cross-level effects of culture and climate in human service teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 767–794.
  • Graf, P. H. (2008). Some differences between research and flight project success strategies. INSIGHT, 11(5), 39–42.
  • Gundlach, M., Zivnuska, S., & Stoner, J. (2006). Understanding the relationship between individualism–collectivism and team performance through an integration of social identity theory and the social relations model. Human Relations, 59(12), 1603–1632.
  • Hamid, N. A. A., & Salim, J. (2011). A conceptual framework of knowledge transfer in Malaysia e-government IT outsourcing: An integration with transactive memory system (TMS). International Journal of Computer Science, 8(5), 51–64.
  • Hammedi, W., Riel, A. C., & Sasovova, Z. (2013). Improving screening decision making through transactive memory systems: A field study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(2), 316–330.
  • Hargadon, A., & Bechky, B. A. (2005). The politics of knowledge work in a software development group. In K. D. Elsbach (Ed.), Qualitative organizational research (pp. 15–35). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Hirschi, A. (2012). Callings and work engagement: Moderated mediation model of work meaningfulness, occupational identity, and occupational self-efficacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(3), 479–485.
  • Hollingshead, A. B., & Brandon, D. P. (2003). Potential benefits of communication in transactive memory systems. Human Communication Research, 29(4), 607–615.
  • Hsu, W. L., Krishnamoorthy, V., & Scholz, J. P. (2006). An alternative test of electromyographic normalization in patients. Muscle & Nerve, 33(2), 232–241.
  • Imran, M., Ariff, M., Sharma, R., & Arshad, N. I. (2015, May). Exploring the role of transactive memory systems in virtual teams: Review and synthesis of literature. The Proceedings of International Symposium on Mathematical Sciences and Computing Research (iSMSC) (pp. 304–309). IEEE.
  • James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 219–229.
  • James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85–98.
  • Jelinek, R., & Ahearne, M. (2010). Be careful what you look for: The effect of trait competitiveness and long hours on salesperson deviance and whether meaningfulness of work matters. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 18(4), 303–321.
  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.
  • Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 783–808.
  • Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social exchange. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed, pp. 233–265). Boston,MA: McGraw– Hill.
  • Kim, Y., & Lee, B. (1995). R&D project team climate and team performance in Korea: A multidimensional approach. R&D Management, 25(2), 179–196.
  • Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58–74.
  • Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 175–192.
  • Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 587–604.
  • Lewis, K. (2004). Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science, 50(11), 1519–1533.
  • Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 384–393.
  • Lin, C. P. (2015). Predicating team performance in technology industry: Theoretical aspects of social identity and self-regulation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 98, 13–23.
  • Lin, C. P., Tsai, Y. H., Chiu, C. K., & Liu, C. P. (2015). Forecasting the purchase intention of IT product: Key roles of trust and environmental consciousness for it firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 99, 148–155.
  • Lin, C. P., Yang, Z. T., & Huang, H. T. (2016). Evaluating team performance and the mediating role of customer knowledge development: An absorptive capacity framework. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 42, 46–64.
  • Liu, H., & Chai, K. H. (2012, June). An agent-based model to assess value in organizational knowledge reuse. The Proceedings of 2012 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology (ICMIT), (pp. 255–260), IEEE.
  • Liu, Y., Keller, R. T., & Shih, H. A. (2011). The impact of team-member exchange, differentiation, team commitment, and knowledge sharing on R&D project team performance. R&D Management, 41(3), 274–287.
  • Liu, M.-L., Liu, N. T., Ding, C. G., & Lin, C. P. (2015). Exploring team performance in high-tech industries: Future trends of building up teamwork. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 91, 295–310.
  • Luan, C.-J., & Tien, C. (2017). Where is foreign institutional investors’ efficacy? A transparency & disclosure perspective. Corporate Management Review, 37(1), 41–75.
  • Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 391–410.
  • May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11–37.
  • Moreland, R. L., & Myaskovsky, L. (2000). Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 117–133.
  • Myers, N. D., Feltz, D. L., & Short, S. E. (2004). Collective efficacy and team performance: A longitudinal study of collegiate football teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8(2), 126–138.
  • Nair, N., & Vohra, N. (2010). An exploration of factors predicting work alienation of knowledge workers. Management Decision, 48(4), 600–615.
  • Norrgren, F., & Schaller, J. (1999). Leadership style: Its impact on cross-functional product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(4), 377–384.
  • Paez, D., Basabe, N., & Gonzalez, J. L. (1997). Social processes and collective memory: A cross-cultural approach to remembering political events. In J. W. Pennebaker, D. Paez, & B. Riml (Eds.), Collective memory of political events: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 147–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Palazzolo, E. T., Serb, D. A., She, Y., Su, C., & Contractor, N. S. (2006). Coevolution of communication and knowledge networks in transactive memory systems: Using computational models for theoretical development. Communication Theory, 16(2), 223–250.
  • Peng, A. C., Lin, H. E., Schaubroeck, J., McDonoughIII, E. F., Hu, B., & Zhang, A. (2016). CEO intellectual stimulation and employee work meaningfulness: The moderating role of organizational context. Group & Organization Management, 41(2), 203–231.
  • Poon, J. M. (2003). Situational antecedents and outcomes of organizational politics perceptions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(2), 138–155.
  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.
  • Ramey, H. L., Rose-Krasnor, L., Busseri, M. A., Gadbois, S., Bowker, A., & Findlay, L. (2015). Measuring psychological engagement in youth activity involvement. Journal of Adolescence, 45, 237–249.
  • Rapp, A., Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Schillewaert, N. (2006). The impact of knowledge and empowerment on working smart and working hard: The moderating role of experience. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(3), 279–293.
  • Rau, D. (2005). The influence of relationship conflict and trust on the transactive memory performance relation in top management teams. Small Group Research, 36(6), 746–771.
  • Reagans, R., Miron-Spektor, E., & Argote, L. (2016). Knowledge utilization, coordination, and team performance. Organization Science, 27(5), 1108–1124.
  • Ren, Y, & Argote, L. (2011). Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 189–229.
  • Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555–572.
  • Ross, W. H., Meyer, C. J., Chen, J. C. V., & Keaton, P. (2009). Information protection at telecommunications firms: Human resource management strategies and their impact on organizational justice. Journal of Information Privacy and Security, 5(1), 49–77.
  • Rothmann, S., & Jordaan, G. M. E. (2006). Job demands, job resources and work engagement of academic staff in South African higher education institutions. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 32(4), 87–96.
  • Rousseau, D. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. In L. L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 1–37). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Rupert, J. (2010). Diversity faultlines and team learning (Working Paper). Department of Social and Organisational Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University.
  • Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338.
  • Sharma, M., & Ghosh, A. (2007). Does team size matter? A study of the impact of team size on the transactive memory system and performance of IT sector teams. South Asian Journal of Management, 14(4), 96–115.
  • Soane, E., Shantz, A., Alfes, K., Truss, C., Rees, C., & Gatenby, M. (2013). The association of meaningfulness, well-being, and engagement with absenteeism: A moderated mediation model. Human Resource Management, 52(3), 441–456.
  • Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M. A., & Nason, S. W. (1997). A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness, satisfaction, and strain. Journal of Management, 23(5), 679–704.
  • Tai, Y.-H. (2017). Earnings management in family firms: The role of inside directors. Corporate Management Review, 37(1), 77–114.
  • Taştan, S. B., & Türker, M. V. (2014). A study of the relationship between organizational culture and job involvement: The moderating role of psychological conditions of meaningfulness and safety. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 943–947.
  • Theiner, G. (2013). Transactive memory systems: A mechanistic analysis of emergent group memory. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(1), 65–89.
  • Tjosvold, D. W., & Tjosvold, M. M. (1991). Leading the team organization. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  • Tsai, Y. H., Joe, S. W., Chen, M. L., Lin, C. P., Ma, H. C., & Du, J. W. (2016). Assessing team performance: Moderating roles of transactive memory, hypercompetition, and emotional regulation. Human Performance, 29(2), 89–105.
  • Uusiautti, S., & Määttä, K. (2014). Roadmaps or merely compasses? Perceived meaningfulness as the core of caring leadership. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 7(5), 735–747.
  • Vaara, E., Sarala, R., Stahl, G. K., & Björkman, I. (2012). The impact of organizational and national cultural differences on social conflict and knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 1–27.
  • Wang, M.-C., Chen, S.-S., & Chiang, J.-M. (2017). Rationality of the personal loan interest-rate markups of banks. Corporate Management Review, 37(1), 115–163.
  • Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Weiss, M., Hoegl, M., & Gibbert, M. (2011). Making virtue of necessity: The role of team climate for innovation in resource-constrained innovation projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(s1), 196–207.
  • West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 309–333). Chichester: Wiley.
  • West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 680–693.
  • West, M. A., Borrill, C. S., Dawson, J. F., Brodbeck, F. C., Shapiro, D. A., & Haward, B. (2003). Leadership clarity and team innovation in health care. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), 393–410.
  • Wheatley, K. K., & Wilemon, D. (1999, August). From emerging technology to competitive advantage. The Proceedings of Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, 1999. PICMET’99. (pp. 35–41), IEEE.
  • Witt, L. A., Hilton, T. F., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2001). Addressing politics in matrix teams. Group & Organization Management, 26(2), 230–247.
  • Woolley, A. W., Hackman, J. R., Jerde, T. J., Chabris, C. F., Bennett, S. L., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2007). Using brain-based measures to compose teams: How individual capabilities and team collaboration strategies jointly shape performance. Social Neuroscience, 2(2), 96–105.
  • Yılmaz, E., Özer, G., & Günlük, M. (2014). Do organizational politics and organizational commitment affect budgetary slack creation in public organizations? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 241–250.
  • Yoo, Y., & Kanawattanachai, P. (2001). Developments of transactive memory systems and collective mind in virtual teams. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(2), 187–208.
  • Yuan, Y. C., Fulk, J., Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. (in press). Expertise directory development, shared task interdependence, and strength of communication network ties as multilevel predictors of expertise exchange in transactive memory work groups. Communication Research. doi: 10.1177/0093650209351469
  • Zhang, Z. X., Hempel, P. S., Han, Y. L., & Tjosvold, D. (2007). Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1722–1730.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.