Management innovation and firm innovation performance: a moderated moderation effects of absorptive capacity and environmental dynamism

References

• Anzola-Román, P., Bayona-Sáez, C., & García-Marco, T. (2018). Organizational innovation, internal R&D and externally sourced innovation practices: Effects on technological innovation outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 91, 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azar, G., & Ciabuschi, F. (2017). Organizational innovation, technological innovation, and export performance: The effects of innovation radicalness and extensiveness. International Business Review, 26(2), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskaran, S., & Mehta, K. (2016). What is innovation anyway? Youth perspectives from resource-constrained environments. Technovation, 52, 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.01.005
   Google Scholar
• Bierly, P. E. III, & Daly, P. S. (2007). Alternative knowledge strategies, competitive environment, and organizational performance in small manufacturing firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(4), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00185.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch-Jensen, A., Gremyr, I., & Halldórsson, Á. (2020). Absorptive capacity as enabler for service improvements− the role of customer satisfaction information usage. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2020.1761786
   Google Scholar
• Boadu, F., Xie, Y., Du, Y.-F., & Dwomo-Fokuo, E. (2018). MNEs subsidiary training and development and firm innovative performance : The moderating effects of tacit and explicit knowledge received from headquarters. Sustainability, 10(11), 4208. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavusgil, T., Ghauri, P. N., & Akcal, A. A. (2013). Doing business in emerging markets (2nd ed). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chien, C. C., Lin, H. C., & Ya-Hui Lien, B. (2015). Capability contingent: The impact of organisational learning styles on innovation performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 26(1–2), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2012.746193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, D. G., Hyun, O. S., Hong, J. I., & Kang, B. G. (2014). Standards as catalyst for national innovation and performance – a capability assessment framework for latecomer countries. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(9–10), 969–985. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2014.893082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadfar, H., Dahlgaard, J. J., Brege, S., & Alamirhoor, A. (2013). Linkage between organizational innovation capability, product platform development, and performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24(7-8), 819–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.791102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F., & Aravind, D. (2012). Managerial innovation: Conceptions, processes, and antecedents. Management and Organization Review, 8(2), 423–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00233.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016). Enablers of Six sigma: Contextual framework and its empirical validation. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(11–12), 1346–1372. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2015.1075877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelen, A., Kube, H., Schmidt, S., & Christina, T. (2014). Entrepreneurial orientation in turbulent environments: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 43(8), 1353–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, H., Gu, W., & Kessler, A. (2017). Environmental dynamism, hostility, and dynamic capabilities in medium-sized enterprises. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 18(3), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750317723219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haan, C. (2002). Statistical methods in hydrology (second ver). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jaccard, J., Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, W., Mavondo, F. T., & Matanda, M. J. (2015). Integrative capability for successful partnering: A critical dynamic capability. Management Decision, 53(6), 1184–1202. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2014-0178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. C., Parast, M. M., & Adams, S. G. (2010). A framework for effective Six Sigma implementation. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21(4), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783361003606720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, R. H., Gaukler, G. M., & Lee, C. W. (2016). Improving healthcare quality: A technological and managerial innovation perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113, 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.012
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, D. M., & Harrington, T. C. (1990). Measuring nonresponse bias in customer service mail surveys. Journal of Business Logistics, 11(2), 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Leavengood, S., Anderson, T. R., & Daim, T. U. (2014). Exploring linkage of quality management to innovation. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(9–10), 1126–1140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2012.738492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, R., Du, Y.-F., Tang, H.-J., Boadu, F., & Xue, M. (2019). MNEs ‘ subsidiary HRM practices and firm innovative performance : A tacit knowledge approach. Sustainability, 11(5), 1388. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051388
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. P., Liu, C. M., Liu, N. T., & Huang, H. T. (2020). Being excellent teams: Managing innovative climate, politics, and team performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 31(3/4), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1427503
   Google Scholar
• Magnier-Watanabe, R., & Benton, C. (2017). Management innovation and firm performance: The mediating effects of tacit and explicit knowledge. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(3), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41275-017-0058-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martini, A., Neirotti, P., & Appio, F. P. (2017). Knowledge searching, integrating, and performing: Always a tuned trio for innovation? Long Range Planning, 50(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad, H. I. (2019). Mediating effect of organizational learning and moderating role of environmental dynamism on the relationship between strategic change and firm performance. Journal of Strategy and Management, 12(2), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-07-2018-0064
   Google Scholar
• Mol, M. J., & Birkinshaw, J. (2009). The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices. Journal of Business Research, 62(12), 1269–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omidvar, O., Edler, J., & Malik, K. (2017). Development of absorptive capacity over time and across boundaries: The case of R&D consortia. Long Range Planning, 50(5), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.02.007
   Google Scholar
• Parkhe, A. (1993). Strategic alliance structuring: A game-theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 794–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, M., Giuliani, P., Guilloton, A., & Khallouk, M. (2019). Management innovation: A dynamic analysis of the implementation phase over time. Production Planning & Control, 30(15), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1605102
   Google Scholar
• Schilke, O. (2014). On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilke, O., Hu, S., & Helfat, C. E. (2018). Quo vadis, dynamic capabilities? A content-analytic review of the current state of knowledge and recommendations for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 390–439. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). The development economics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simerly, R. L., & Li, M. (2000). Environmental dynamism, capital structure, and performance: A theoretical integration and an empirical test. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200001)21:1<31::AID-SMJ76>3.0.CO;2-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanik, M., & Sen, A. (2012). A six sigma case study in a large-scale automotive supplier company in Turkey. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(3–4), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2011.637798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2014). The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., & Pisano G, S. A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volberda, H. W., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Heij, C. V. (2013). Management innovation: Management as fertile ground for innovation. European Management Review, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wales, W. J., Parida, V., & Patel, P. C. (2013). Too much of a good thing? Absorptive capacity, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(5), 622–633. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., Chen, J., & Aravind, D. (2015). Management innovation and firm performance: An integration of research findings. European Management Journal, 33(5), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, E. T. G., & Wei, H.-L. (2005). The importance of market orientation, learning orientation, and quality orientation capabilities in TQM: An example from Taiwanese software industry. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 16(10), 1161–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360500236270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, M., Boadu, F., & Xie, Y. (2019). The penetration of Green innovation on firm performance : effects of absorptive capacity and managerial environmental concern. Sustainability, 11(9), 2455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, D., Li, L., Jiang, X., & Zhao, J. (2020). The fit between market learning and organizational capabilities for management innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 86, 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, A., Lumpkin, G., Praveen Parboteeah, K., & Stambaugh, J. E. (2019). Autonomy and family business performance : The joint effect of environmental dynamism and national culture. International Small Business Journal, 37(2), 153–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242618811893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar