The source of lexical transfer in L3 production in a diglossic context

References

• Arabski, J. (2006). Language transfer in language learning and language contact. In J. Arabski (Ed.), Cross-linguistic influences in the second language lexicon (pp. 12–21). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Augustín Llach, M. P. (2011). Lexical errors and accuracy in foreign language writing. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Celaya, M. L. (2007). I study natus in English: Lexical transfer in CLIL and regular learners. Paper presented at the AESLA Conference, Murcia, Spain, April, 19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J. (2000). Research on multilingual acquisition. In J. Cenoz & U. Jessner (Eds.), English in Europe: The acquisition of a third language (pp. 39–53). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J. (2001). The effect of linguistic distance, L2 status and age on cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 8–20). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B., & Jessner, U. (2001). Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J., & Valincia, J. F. (1994). Additive trilingualism: Evidence from the Basque country. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 195–207. doi: 10.1017/S0142716400005324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clyne, M. (1997). Some of the things trilinguals do. International Journal of Bilingualism, 1, 95–116. doi: 10.1177/136700699700100201
   Google Scholar
• Cook, V. (1992). Evidence for multicompetence. Language Learning, 42, 557–591. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01044.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulmas, F. (1987). What writing can do to language: Some preliminary remarks. In S. Battestini (Ed.), Developments in linguistics and semiotics, language teaching and learning, communication across cultures (pp. 107–129). Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics, 1986. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Angelis, G., & Selinker, L. (2001). Interlanguage transfer and competing linguistic systems in the multilingual mind. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 42–58). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Dewaele, J. (1998). Lexical inventions: French interlanguage as l2 versus L3. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 471–490. doi: 10.1093/applin/19.4.471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewaele, J. (2001). Activation or inhibition? The interaction of L1, L2 and L3 on the language mode continuum. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 69–89). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Ecke, P. (2001). Lexical retrieval in a third language: Evidence from errors and tip-of-the-tongue states. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 90–114). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. (1994). Psychological perspectives on the role of conscious processes in vocabulary acquisition. AILA Review, 11, 37–56.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. (1997). Vocabulary acquisition: Word structure, collocation, word-class, and meaning. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 122–139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 14, 47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, J. (1999). Between three languages: Composite structure in interlanguage. Applied Linguistics, 20(4), 534–561. doi: 10.1093/applin/20.4.534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. (1986). Control, activation and resource: A framework and a model for the control of speech in bilinguals. Brain and Language, 27, 210–223. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(86)90016-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual’s language modes. In J. L. Nicol (Ed.), Language processing in the bilingual (pp. 1–25). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hammarberg, B. (1998). The learners’ word acquisition attempts in conversation. In D. Albrechtsen, B. Henriksen, I. M. Mees, & E. Poulsen (Eds.), Perspectives on foreign and second language pedagogy (pp. 177–190). Odense: Odense University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammarberg, B. (2001). Roles of L1 and L2 in L3 production. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 21–41). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2000). The dynamics of third language acquisition. In J. Cenoz, & U. Jessner (Eds.), English in Europe: The acquisition of a third language (pp. 84–98). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Herwig, A. (2001). Plurilingual lexical organization: Evidence from lexical processing in L1-L2-L3-L4 translation. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 115–137). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S. (2000). Methodological rigor in the study of transfer: Identifying L1 influence in them interlanguage lexicon. Language Learning, 50(2), 245–309. doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.00118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S. (2003). Probing the effects of the L2 on the L1: A case study. In V. Cook (Ed.), Effects of the second language on the first (pp. 81–102). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S. (2009). Lexical transfer. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), Bilingual mental lexicon: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 99–124). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York, NY: Rutledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jordà, L. P. S. (2004). The role of bilingualism in the use of request acts peripheral modification devices. ACTS/Proceedings II Simpnosio Internacional Bilinguismo, II, 343–368.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, J. E. (1987). Eloquence and power: The rise of language standards and standard languages. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kellerman, E. (1977). Toward a characterisation of the strategy of transfer in second language learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 2, 58–145.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, E. (1995). Second versus third language acquisition: Is there a difference? Language Learning, 45(3), 419–466. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00448.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D. (1998). Creatividad y conciencia metalinguistica: incidencia en el apredizaje del ingles como L3. Leioa: Universidad del Pais Vasco.
   Google Scholar
• LoCoco, V. (1975). An analysis of Spanish and German learners’ errors. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 7, 96–124.
   Google Scholar
• Mùňoz, C. (2000). Bilingualism and Trilingualism in school students in Catalonia. In J. Cenoz & U. Jessner (Eds.), English in Europe: The acquisition of a third language (pp. 84–98). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Naves, T., Miralpeix, I., & Celaya, M. L. (2005). Who transfers more … and what? Crosslinguistic influence in relation to school grade and language dominance in EFL. International Journal of Multilingualism, 2(2), 113–134. doi: 10.1080/14790710508668380
   Google Scholar
• Nemser, W. (1998). Variations on a theme by haastrup. In D. Albrechtsen, B. Henriksen, I. M. Mees, & E. Poulsen (Eds.), Perspectives on foreign and second language pedagogy. Essays presented to Kirsten Haastrup on the occasion of her sixtieth birthday (pp. 107–118). Odense: Odense University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Second Edition 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Odlin, T. (2003). Cross-Linguistic influence. In C. Doughty, & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 436–486). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Odlin, T., & Jarvis, S. (2004). Same source, different outcomes: A study of Swedish influence on the acquisition of English in Finland. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(2), 123–140. doi: 10.1080/14790710408668183
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, S. (1999). Errors and compensatory strategies: A study of grammar and vocabulary in texts written by Norwegian learners of English. System, 27, 191–205. doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00016-0
   Google Scholar
• Poulisse, N., & Bongaerts, T. (1994). First language use in second language production. Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 36–57. doi: 10.1093/applin/15.1.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricciadelli, A. (1992). Creativity and bilingualism. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 26, 242–254. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1992.tb01183.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringbom, H. (1987). The role of the first language in foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Ringbom, H. (2001). Lexical transfer in L3 production. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Crosslinguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 59–68). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters LTD.
   Google Scholar
• Ringbom, H. (2006). The importance of different types of similarity in transfer studies. In J. Arabski (Ed.), Cross-linguistic influences in the second language lexicon (pp. 36–45). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Ringbom, H. (2007). Cross-linguistic influence in foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Saeigh-Haddad, E. (2004). The impact of phonemic and lexical distance on phonological analysis of words and pseudo words in a diglossic context. Applied Psycholiguistics, 25, 495–512. doi: 10.1017/S0142716404001249
   Google Scholar
• Saeigh-Haddad, E. (2012). Literacy reflexes of Arabic diglossia. In M. Leikin, M. Schwartz, & Y. Tobin (Eds.), Current issues in bilingualism: Cognitive and socio-linguistic perspectives (pp. 43–56). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sanz, C. (2000). Bilingual education enhances third language acquisition: Evidence from Catalonia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 23–44. doi: 10.1017/S0142716400001028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharwood Smith, M. (1994). Second language learning: Theoretical foundations. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, D., & O’Laoire, M. (2004). Psychotypology and the “L2 Factor” in cross-lexical interaction: An analysis of English and Irish influence in learner French. Paper presented at the EUROSLA Conference, San Sebastian, September, 2004. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Suleiman, S. M. (1985). Jordanian Arabic between Diglossia and Bilingualism: Linguistic analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. (1988). The role played by metalinguistic awareness in second and third language learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 9, 235–246. doi: 10.1080/01434632.1988.9994334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. (1992). Metalinguistic awareness in second and third language learning. In R. J. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 531–545). Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Trimasse, N. (2011). The effect of age, proficiency and task type on lexical transfer: The case of Moroccan EFL learners. Saarbrucken: LAP: LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, S., & Hammarberg, B. (1997). L1 and L2 influence in L3 production. Stockholm: Stockholm University, Centre for Research on Bilingualism.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, S., & Hammarberg, B. (1998). Language switches in L3 production: Implications for a polyglot speaking model. Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 295–333. doi: 10.1093/applin/19.3.295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar