Studying the role of human agency in school mathematics

References

• Burton, L., & Morgan, C. (2000). Mathematicians writing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 429–453. doi:10.2307/749652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, A. (2003). Language practices in school mathematics: A social semiotic approach. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2013). National curriculum in England: Mathematics programmes of study - key stage 3. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/239058/SECONDARY_national_curriculum_-_Mathematics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, P. (1998). The sociology of mathematics education: Mathematical myths/ pedagogic texts. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1974). Some aspects of sociolinguistics interactions between linguistics and mathematical education symposium. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1993a). On the language of physical science. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 54–68). London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1993b). Some grammatical problems in scientific English. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power (pp. 69–85). London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Wagner, D. (2007). A framework for uncovering the way a textbook may position the mathematics learner. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(2), 8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hersh, R. (1997). What is mathematics, really? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., & Sfard, A. (2012). Identity struggles in the mathematics classroom: On learning mathematics as an interplay of mathematizing and identifying. International Journal of Educational Research, 51–52, 128–145. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.12.015
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government. (2015). Mathematics curriculum and assessment guide (Secondary 4–6). Hong Kong: HKSARG. Retrieved from http://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/kla/ma/curr/Math_CAGuide_e_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Klein, M. (2012). How inconvenient assumptions affect preservice teachers’ uptake of new interactional patterns in mathematics: Analysis and aspiration through a bifocal lens. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 25–40. doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9390-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2005). Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning. Computers and Composition, 22(1), 5–22. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2004.12.004
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, G. (2013). Emotion and disaffection with school mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 15(1), 70–86. doi: 10.1080/14794802.2012.756636
   Google Scholar
• Mendick, H. (2005). A beautiful myth? The gendering of being/doing ‘good at maths’. Gender and Education, 17(2), 203–219. doi: 10.1080/0954025042000301465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. (1998). Writing mathematically: The discourse of investigation. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. (2001). Mathematics and human activity: Representation in mathematical writing. In C. Morgan & K. Jones (Eds.), Research in mathematics education volume 3: Papers of the British society for research into learning mathematics (pp. 169–182). London: British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. (2005). Words, definitions and concepts in discourses of mathematics, teaching and learning. Language and Education, 19(2), 102–116. doi: 10.1080/09500780508668666
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. (2006). What does social semiotics have to offer mathematics education research?. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1/2), 219–245. doi:10.1007/s10649-006-5477-x
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, E., & Steward, S. (2003). Is mathematics T.I.R.E.D? A profile of quiet disaffection in the secondary mathematics classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 345–366. doi: 10.1080/01411920301852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L. (2004). Discourses in secondary school mathematics classrooms according to social class and gender. In J. A. Foley (Ed.), Language, education and discourse: Functional approaches (pp. 191–225). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keeffe, L. (2013). A framework for textbook analysis. International Review of Contemporary Learning Research, 2(1), 1–13. doi: 10.12785/irclr/020101
   Google Scholar
• Pimm, D. (1984). Who is we?. Mathematics Teaching, 107, 39–42.
   Google Scholar
• Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. London: Routledge Kegan & Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Studies Authority. (2013). Year 7 mathematics - Australian curriculum in Queensland. Brisbane: Queensland Studies Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. (1991). Mathematical discussions. In E. von-Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 13–51). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rotman, B. (1988). Towards a semiotics of mathematics. Semiotica, 72(1/2), 1–36. doi: 10.1515/semi.1988.72.1-2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. (2004). The math wars. Educational Policy, 18(1), 253–286. doi: 10.1177/0895904803260042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (2000). Symbolizing mathematical reality into being – or how mathematical discourse and mathematical objects create each other. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 37–98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, Y. (2012). Finding a voice? Narrating the female self in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 171–183. doi: 10.1007/s10649-012-9384-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, Y., & O’Neill, J. (1998). Mathematics and narrative. Language and Education, 12(3), 210–221. doi: 10.1080/09500789808666749
   Google Scholar
• Tabach, M., & Nachlieli, T. (2011). Combining theories to analyse classroom discourse: A method to study learning process. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland, & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2524–2532). Rzeszów, Poland: University of Rseszów.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, D. (1993). Problem solving and investigations (3rd (enlarged) ed.). Bristol: Rain Press.
   Google Scholar