280
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The effect of semantic cues on the difficulty of word problems and the interplay with other complicating variables

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 85-102 | Received 15 Feb 2020, Accepted 27 Nov 2020, Published online: 04 Feb 2021

References

  • Bassok, M., Chase, V. M., & Martin, S. A. (1998). Adding apples and oranges: Semantic constraints on application of formal rules. Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 99–134. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0675
  • Bassok, M., Pedigo, S. F., & Oskarsson, A. T. (2008). Priming addition facts with semantic relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(2), 343–352. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.343
  • Bell, A., Greer, B., Grimison, L., & Mangan, C. (1989). Children’s performance on multiplicative word problems: Elements of a descriptive theory. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 434–449. doi:10.2307/749419
  • Briars, D. J., & Larkin, J. H. (1984). An integrated model of skill in solving elementary word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 1(3), 245–296. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0103_1
  • Coquin-Viennot, D., & Moreau, S. (2003). Highlighting the role of the episodic situation model in the solving of arithmetical problems. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18(3), 267–279. doi:10.1348/000709903762869941
  • Daroczy, G., Wolska, M., Meurers, W. D., & Nuerk, H. C. (2015). Word problems: A review of linguistic and numerical factors contributing to their difficulty. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(348), 22–34. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00348
  • De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1991). Some factors influencing the solution of addition and subtraction word problems. In K. Durkin, & B. Shire (Eds.), Language and mathematical education (pp. 117–130). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Depaepe, F., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Teachers’ approaches towards word problem solving: Elaborating or restricting the problem context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 152–160. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.016
  • Goldin, G. A., & McClintock, E. C. (Eds.). (1979). Task variables in mathematical problem solving. Columbus, OH: Franklin Institute Press.
  • Havlíčková, R., Hříbková, L., & Páchová, A. (2015). Slovní úlohy jako kritické místo matematiky 1. stupně základní školy [Word problems as a critical point in elementary mathematics]. In N. Vondrová, & M. Rendl (Eds.), Kritická místa matematiky základní školy v řešeních žáků (s. 27–132). Praha: Karolinum.
  • Hembree, R. (1992). Experiments and relational studies in problem solving: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(3), 242–273. doi:10.2307/749120
  • Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Lubienski, S. T., & Bowen, A. (2000). Who’s counting? A survey of mathematics education research 1982–1998. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 626–633. doi:10.2307/749890
  • Martin, S. A., & Bassok, M. (2005). Effects of semantic cues on mathematical modeling: Evidence from word-problem solving and equation construction tasks. Memory & Cognition, 33(3), 471–478. doi:10.3758/BF03193064
  • Maxwell, M., & Gleason, J. (2018). Item efficiency: An item response theory parameter with applications for improving the reliability of mathematics assessment. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(2), 216–243. doi:10.1080/0020739x.2018.1492038
  • Muth, K. D. (1992). Extraneous information and extra steps in arithmetic word problems. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 278–285.
  • Nesher, P. (1976). Three determinants of difficulty in verbal arithmetic problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7, 369–388.
  • Nesher, P., & Teubal, E. (1975). Verbal cues as an interfering factor in verbal problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 6(1), 41–51.
  • Nunes, T., Dorneles, B. V., Lin, P. J., & Rathgeb-Schnierer, E. (2016). Teaching and learning about whole numbers in primary school. ICME-13 Topical Surveys. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Palm, T. (2008). Impact of authenticity on sense making in word problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(1), 37–58. doi:10.1007/s10649-007-9083-3
  • Pape, S. (2003). Compare word problems: Consistency hypothesis revisited. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(3), 396–421. doi:10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00046-2
  • Pongsakdi, N., Kajamies, A., Veermans, K., Lertola, K., Vauras, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2020). What makes mathematical word problem solving challenging? Exploring the roles of word problem characteristics, text comprehension, and arithmetic skills. ZDM, 52(1), 33–44. doi:10.1007/s11858-019-01118-9
  • Reusser, K. (1985). From situation to equation. On formulation, understanding and solving “situation problems”. Technical Report no. 143. Colorado: Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado.
  • Riley, M. S., Greeno, J. G., & Heller, J. J. (1983). Development of children’s problem solving ability in arithmetic. In H. P. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 153–196). New York: Academic Press.
  • Shen, Z., Popov, V., Delahay, A. B., & Reder, L. M. (2018). Item strength affects working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 46(2), 204–215. doi:10.3758/s13421-017-0758-4
  • Stigler, J. W., Fuson, K. C., Ham, M., & Sook Kim, M. (1986). An analysis of addition and subtraction word problems in American and Soviet elementary mathematics textbooks. Cognition and Instruction, 3(3), 153–171. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0303_1
  • Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123–138. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
  • Tyumeneva, Y. A., Larina, G., Alexandrova, E., DeWolf, M., Bassok, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (2018). Semantic alignment across whole-number arithmetic and rational numbers: Evidence from a Russian perspective. Thinking & Reasoning: Special Issue on Reasoning and Mathematics, 24(2), 198–220. doi:10.1080/13546783.2017.1374307
  • Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114(1), 104–132. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.104
  • Verschaffel, L., & De Corte, E. (1993). A decade of research on word problem solving in Leuven: Theoretical, methodological, and practical outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 5(3), 239–256.
  • Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., & Pauwels, A. (1992). Solving compare problems: An eye movement test of Lewis and Mayer’s consistency hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 85–94. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.1.85
  • Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.
  • Vicente, S., Orrantia, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2008). Influence of situational and mathematical information on situationally difficult word problems. Studia Psychologica, 50(4), 337–356.
  • Vlahović-Štetić, V., Rovan, D., & Mendek, Ž. (2004). The role of students’ age, problem type and situational context in solving mathematical word problems. Review of Psychology, 11(1–2), 25–33.
  • Vondrová, N., Havlíčková, R., Hirschová, M., Chvál, M., Novotná, J., Páchová, A., Smetáčková, I., Šmejkalová, M., & Tůmová, V. (2019a). Matematická slovní úloha: mezi matematikou, jazykem a psychologií [Mathematical word problems: Between mathematics, language and psychology]. Praha: Karolinum.
  • Vondrová, N., Novotná, J., & Havlíčková, R. (2019b). The influence of solving and situational information on pupils’ achievement in additive word problems with several states and transformations. ZDM, 51(1), 183–197. doi:10.1007/s11858-018-0991-8
  • Voyer, D. (2011). Performance in mathematical problem solving as a function of comprehension and arithmetic skills. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1073–1092. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9239-y
  • Zohar, A., & Gershikov, A. (2008). Gender and performance in mathematical tasks: Does the context make a difference? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(4), 677–693. doi:10.1007/s10763-007-9086-7

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.