References
- Bakker, A. (2014). Characterising and developing vocational mathematical knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(2), 151–156.
- Barmby, P., & Wheadon, C. (2019). A comparative judgement study of MEI GCSE exam items. Durham: No More Marking.
- Bellamy, A. (2017). Forced GCSE mathematics resits: Students’ voices. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 37(1), 1–6.
- Biesta, G. (2013). The beautiful risk of education. Boulder: Paradigm.
- Boaler, J., Wiliam, D., & Brown, M. (2000). Students’ experiences of ability grouping: Disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 631–648.
- Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Cambridge: Polity.
- Butterfield, S. (1998). Conditions for choice? The context for implementation of curricular pathways in the curriculum, 14-19, in England and Wales. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28(1), 9–20.
- Clark, M., & Lovric, M. (2009). Understanding secondary–tertiary transition in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(6), 755–776.
- Cornish, C. (2017). Case study: Level 1 Skills to succeed (S2S) students and the gatekeeping function of GCSEs (General Certificate of Secondary Education) at an FE college. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 22(1), 7–21.
- Dalby, D. (2012). From failure to functionality: A study of the experience of vocational students with functional mathematics in Further Education. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 32(3), 55–60.
- Dalby, D. (2013). An alternative destination for post-16 mathematics: Views from the perspective of vocational students. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 33(3), 13–18.
- Dalby, D. (2015). A study of the experiences of vocational students learning functional mathematics in further education colleges (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham). University of Nottingham Repository. Retrieved from http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/28308/1/Thesis%20final%20Dec%202014.pdf
- Dalby, D., & Noyes, A. (2016). Locating mathematics within post-16 vocational education in England. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 68(1), 70–86.
- Dalby, D., & Noyes, A. (2018). Mathematics education policy enactment in England’s further education colleges. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 70(4), 564–580.
- Dalby, D., & Noyes, A. (2020). The waxing and waning of functional skills mathematics. Journal of Vocational Education and Training [online], 1–20.
- Davies, K., Dudciz, S., Lee, S., Newton, M., & Stripp, C. (2020). A new mathematics GCSE curriculum for post-16 resit students. Final report. Trowbridge: MEI.
- Department for Education. (2016). Participation of young people in education, employment or training: Statutory guidance for local authorities. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/561546/Participation-of-young-people-in-education-employment-or-training.pdf
- Department for Education. (2018). Functional skills English and mathematics subject content: Government consultation response. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/684220/Functional_Skills_Reform_Consultation_Government-Response.pdf
- Department for Education. (2019). GCSE factsheet for employers, FE and HE providers. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/800506/GCSE_factsheet_for_employers_FE_and_HE_providers__final_.pdf
- Department for Education. (2020a). Level 2 and 3 attainment in England: Attainment by age 19 in 2019. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/881199/Level_2_and_3_attainment_by_19_2019_statistical_commentary.pdf
- Department for Education. (2020b). National achievement rates tables 2018 to 2019. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/national-achievement-rates-tables-2018-to-2019
- Duffy, G., & Elwood, J. (2013). The perspectives of ‘disengaged’ students in the 14–19 phase on motivations and barriers to learning within the contexts of institutions and classrooms. London Review of Education, 11(2), 112–126.
- Education & Skills Funding Agency. (2014–2020). 16 to 19 funding: Maths and English condition of funding. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/guidance/16-to-19-funding-maths-and-english-condition-of-funding
- Education & Training Foundation. (2014). Effective practices in post-16 vocational maths. Final report. Retrieved from https://www.et-foundation.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Effective-Practices-in-Post-16-Vocational-Maths-v4-0.pdf
- Education & Training Foundation. (2015). Making maths and English work for all. Retrieved from https://www.et-foundation.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Making-maths-and-English-work-for-all-25_03_2015001.pdf
- FitzSimons, G. E. (2014). Commentary on vocational mathematics education: Where mathematics education confronts the realities of people's work. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(2), 291–305.
- Gov.uk. (n.d.). What qualification levels mean. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/what-different-qualification-levels-mean/list-of-qualification-levels
- Groot, B., Sanders, M., Rogers, T., & Bloomenthal, E. (2017). I get by with a little help from my friends: Two field experiments on social support and attendance in further education colleges in the UK. London: The Behavioural Insights Team.
- Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 233–240.
- Head, G. (2016). Entitlement and adherence in schools. Contemporary Social Science, 11(1), 18–29.
- Hodgen, J., Pepper, D., Sturman, L., & Ruddock, G. (2010). Is the UK an outlier? An international comparison for upper secondary mathematics education. London: Nuffield Foundation.
- Lindberg, L., & Grevholm, B. (2013). Mathematics in VET programmes: The tensions associated with reforms in Sweden. International Journal of Training Research, 11(2), 150–165.
- Machin, S., McNally, S., & Ruiz-Valenzuela, J. (2018). Entry through the narrow door: The costs of just failing high stakes exams. London: Centre for Vocational Educational Research.
- Mathieson, R., Homer, M., Tasara, I., & Banner, I. (2020). ‘Core Maths chooses you; you don’t choose Core Maths’. The positioning of a new mathematics course within the post-16 curriculum in England. Curriculum Journal, 31(4), 704–721.
- Middleton, J. A., & Spanias, P. A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 65–88.
- Muller, J. (2009). Forms of knowledge and curriculum coherence. Journal of Education and Work, 22(3), 205–226.
- Noyes, A. (2006). Using metaphor in mathematics teacher preparation. Teaching & Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 22(7), 898–909.
- Noyes, A., & Adkins, M. (2016). Studying advanced mathematics in England: Findings from a survey of student choices and attitudes. Research in Mathematics Education, 18(3), 231–248.
- Noyes, A., & Dalby, D. (2020). Students’ perspectives on mathematics in further education colleges. The mathematics in Further Education Colleges Project: Interim report 3. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
- Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation. (2014). Technical paper to the Ofqual board in relation to decisions on grading the new 9 to 1 GCSEs. Coventry: Author.
- Pais, A. (2013). An ideology critique of the use-value of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(1), 15–34.
- Schinck, A. G., Neale, H. W., Pugalee, D. K., & Cifarelli, V. V. (2008). Using metaphors to unpack student beliefs about mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 108(7), 326–333.
- Sezen, C. (2019). GCSE results: Why it’s time to review the resits policy. TES. Retrieved from https://www.tes.com/news/gcse-results-why-its-time-review-resits-policy
- Smith, A. (2004). Making mathematics count. London: The Stationary Office.
- Smith, A. (2017). Report of Professor Sir Adrian Smith’s review of post-16 mathematics. London: DfE.
- Wake, G. (2014). Making sense of and with mathematics: The interface between academic mathematics and mathematics in practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(2), 271–290.
- Williams, J. (2012). Use and exchange value in mathematics education: Contemporary CHAT meets Bourdieu’s sociology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 57–72.
- Wolf, A. (2011). Review of vocational education: The Wolf report. London: Department for Education.