REFERENCES
- Burton, L. (1999). The practices of mathematicians: What do they tell us about coming to know mathematics? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37, 121–141.
- Carlson, M., & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 45–75.
- Dreyfus, T., & Eisenberg, T. (1986). On the aesthetics of mathematical thoughts. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(1), 2–10.
- Dubinsky, E., & McDonald, M. (2001). APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In D. Holton et al. (Eds.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An ICMI study (pp. 275–282). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Hadamard, J. (1954). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
- Harel, G. (2006). Mathematics education research, its nature, and its purpose: A discussion on Lester's paper. Zentralblatt fuer Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(1), 58–62.
- Hauk, S., & Tsay, J.-J. (2013). Using cases: Experts talk about their experiences. In S. Hauk, N.M. Kung, J.-J. Tsay, & E. Hsu (Eds.), Video cases for college mathematics instructor professional development. Retrieved from http://collegemathvideocases.org/pdf/UsingCases.pdf
- Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J.P., Weber, K., & Alcock, L. (2013). On mathematicians’ different standards when evaluating elementary proofs. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5, 270–282.
- Kelly, A.E., & Lesh, R.A. (2000). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- LeCompte, M.D., Millroy, W.L., & Preissle, J. (Eds.). (1992). The handbook of qualitative research in education. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Mason, J. (2010). Mathematics education: Theory, practice and memories over 50 years. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(3), 3–9.
- McKnight, C., Magid, A., Murphy, T.J., & McKnight, M. (2000). Mathematics education research: A guide for the research mathematician. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
- Mejia-Ramos, J.P., & Weber, K. (2014). Why and how mathematicians read proofs: Further evidence from a survey study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85, 161–173.
- Poincaré, H. (1952). Science and method. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
- Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D.A. Grows (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York, NY: Macmillan.
- Schoenfeld, A.H. (2000). Purposes and methods of research in mathematics education. Notices of the AMS, 47(6), 641–649.
- Schoenfeld, A.H. (2002). Research methods in (mathematics) education. In L.D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 435–488). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Schoenfeld, A.H., & Hermann, D.J. (1982). Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 8(5), 484–494.
- Selden, A. (2002). Two research traditions separated by a common subject: Mathematics and mathematics education (Tech. Rep. No. 2002-2). Cookeville, TN: Technological University Mathematics Department.