Exploring Associations Among Writing Self-Perceptions, Writing Abilities, and Native Language of English-Spanish Two-Way Immersion Students

REFERENCES

• Arce, J. (2000). Developing voices: Transformative education in a first-grade two-way Spanish immersion classroom, a participatory study. Bilingual Research Journal, 24, 249–260. doi:10.1080/15235882.2000.10162764
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Twenge, J. M. (2005). Social exclusion impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 589–604. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E. (1988). Levels of bilingualism and levels of linguistic awareness. Developmental Psychology, 24, 560–567. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.4.560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, J. M. (2008). Academic self-concept, subjective task value, and beliefs about intelligence in dual-language and English-only elementary school students ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Boice, R. (1994). How writers journey to comfort and fluency. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Bottomley, D. M., Henk, W. A., & Melnick, S. A. (1997). Assessing children’s views about themselves as writers using the Writer Self-Perception Scale. The Reading Teacher, 51, 286–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruning, R., & Horn, C. (2000). Developing motivation to write. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 25–37. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3501_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazabon, M., Nicoladis, E., & Lambert, W. E. (1998). Becoming bilingual in the Amigos two-way immersion program. Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Cazabon, M. T., Lambert, W. E., & Hall, G. (1993). Two-way bilingual education: A progress report on the Amigos program ( Research Rep. No.7). Santa Cruz, CA and Washington, DC: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, B. J., & Shreve, G. M. (2010). Neural, physiological and behavioral correlates of language translation and interpretation in the bilingual brain. In G. Shreve & E. Agelone (Eds.), Translation and cognition (pp. 289–321). Philadelphia, PA: Johns Benjamin.
   Google Scholar
• Dolson, D. P., & Mayer, J. (1992). Longitudinal study of three program models for language-minority students: A critical examination of reported findings. Bilingual Research Journal, 16, 105–158. doi:10.1080/15235882.1992.10162631
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escamilla, K. (2000). Bilingual means two: Assessment issues, early literacy and two language children. In Research in literacy for limited English proficient students (pp. 100–128). Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/files/Report.pd
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, J. (1991). Reversing language shift. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Gerena, L. (2010). Student attitudes toward biliteracy in a dual immersion program. The Reading Matrix, 10, 55–78.
   Google Scholar
• Gort, M. (2006). Strategic code switching, interliteracy, and other phenomena of emergent bilingual writing: Lessons from first grade dual language classrooms. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 6, 323–354. doi:10.1177/1468798406069796
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading ( Carnegie Corporation Time to Act Report). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
   Google Scholar
• Henk, W. A., Bottomley, D. M., & Melnick, S. A. (1996). Preliminary validation of the Writer Self-Perception Scale. In E. Sturtevant & W. Linek (Eds.), Growing literacy (pp. 188–199). Harrisonburg, VA: College Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Henk, W. A., & Melnick, S. A. (1995). The reader self-perception scale (RSPS): A new tool for measuring how children feel about themselves as readers. The Reading Teacher, 48, 470–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, E. (2004). Two-way immersion education: An integrated approach to bilingual education in the United States. In X.P. Rodriguez-Yanez, A.M. Lorenzo-Suarez & F. Ramallo (Eds.), Bilingualism and Education: From the Family to the School (pp. 229–236). Munich: Lincom Europa.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, E. R., Sugarman, J., & Christian, D. (2003). Trends in two-way immersion education: A review of the research ( Report No. 63). Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk.
   Google Scholar
• Lindholm-Leary, K., & Borsato, G. (2001). Impact of two-way bilingual elementary programs on students’ attitudes toward school and college ( Research report 10). Santa Cruz, CA and Washington, DC: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Lindholm-Leary, K. J., & Ferrante, A. (2005). Follow-up study of middle school two-way students: Language proficiency, achievement and attitudes. In R. Hoosain & F. Salili (Eds.), Language in multicultural education (pp. 157–179). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• López, M. G., & Tashakkori, A. (2006). Differential outcomes of two bilingual education programs on English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 30, 123–145. doi:10.1080/15235882.2006.10162869
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, H., & Graves, B. (2001). Speaking personalities in primary school children’s L2 writing. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 561–593. doi:10.2307/3588428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 50, 940–967. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Beltran, M. (2010). The two-way language ridge: Co-constructing bilingual language learning opportunities. Modern Language Journal, 94, 254–277. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01020.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, S. J., & García, G. E. (2005). English language learners’ writing practices and attitudes. Written Communication, 22, 36–75. doi:10.1177/0741088304271830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 3–53. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (2012).The Nation’s Report Card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012–470). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2011/2012470.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Neugebauer, Rak, S. (2011). A new measure to assess linguistic self-esteem in adolescent Latino bilinguals. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 33, 4, 425–446.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto, S. (1999). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 139–158. doi:10.1080/10573560308222
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., Valiante, G., & Cheong, Y. F. (2007). Writing self-efficacy and its relation to gender, writing motivation, and writing competence: A developmental perspective. In S. Hidi & P. Boscolo (Eds.), Motivation and writing: Research and school practice (pp. 141–162). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Schierloh, J. M. (1991). Teaching standard English usage: A dialect-based approach. Adult Learning, 2, 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., & Biancarosa, G. (2003). Adolescent literacy and the achievement gap: What do we know and where do we go from here? New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi-Breines, H. (2002). The role of teacher-talk in a dual language immersion third grade classroom. Bilingual Research Journal, 26, 461–483. doi:10.1080/15235882.2002.10668721
   Google Scholar
• Troia, G., Harbaugh, A., Shankland, R., Wolbers, K., & Lawrence, A. (2013). Relationships between writing motivation, writing activity, and writing performance: Effects of grade, sex, and ability. Reading and Writing, 26, 17–44. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9379-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dorp, I. E. (2000). Biliteracy, monoliteracy and self-concept in native Spanish-dominant and native English-dominant fifth graders ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202–231). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar