References
- Agranoff, R. (2008). Enhancing performance through public sector networks. Public Performance and Management Review, 31, 320–347.
- Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12 (3–4), 3–22.
- Babb, S., Stewart, C., & Johnson, R. (2010). Constructing communication in blended learning environments: Students’ perceptions of good practice in hybrid courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 735–753.
- Bingham, L. B., O’Leary, R., & Carlson, C. (2008). Frameshifting lateral thinking for collaborative public management. In L. B. Bingham & R. O’Leary (Eds.), Big ideas in collaborative public management (pp. 3–16). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
- Bischoff, W. R., Biscotier, S., Kooker, B., & Woods, L. (1996). Transactional distance and interactive television in the distance education of health professionals. American Journal of Distance Education, 10(3), 4–19.
- Chen, Y. J., & Willits, F. K. (1998). A path analysis of the concepts in Moore’s theory of transactional distance in a videoconferencing learning environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 51–65.
- Garrison, D. R. (2012). Theoretical foundations and epistemological insights of the community of inquiry. In Z. Akyol & D. R. Garrison (Eds), Educational communities of inquiry: Theoretical framework, research and practice (pp. 1–11). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
- Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2013). The community of inquiry theoretical framework. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 104–119). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2000). A transactional perspective on teaching and learning: A perspective for adult and higher education. Oxford, United Kingdom: Pergamon.
- Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Goel, L., Zhang, P., & Templeton, M. (2012). Transactional distance revisited: Bridging face and empirical validity. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1122–1129.
- Gorsky, P., & Caspi, A. (2005). A critical analysis of transactional distance theory. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), 1–11.
- Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Ho, A., Lu, L., & Thurmaier, K. (2006). Testing the reluctant professor’s hypothesis: evaluating a blended-learning approach to distance education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 12(1), 81–102.
- Hu, Q., & Johnston, E. (2012). Using a wiki-based course design to create a student-centered learning environment: Strategies and lessons. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(3), 493–512.
- Kanuka, H., Collett, D. & Caswell, C. (2002). University instructor perceptions of the use of asynchronous text-based discussion in distance courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 151–167.
- Learning Technology Center, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. (2014). Hybrid courses. Retrieved December 16, 2014, from http://www4.uwm.edu/ltc/hybrid/about_hybrid/index.cfm.
- Lee, J., & Gibson, C. C. (2003). Developing self-direction in an online course through computer mediated interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 17(3), 173–187.
- Mayadas, F., Bourne, J., & Moore, J. C. (2003). Introduction. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Practice and direction (Sloan-C Series 4, pp. 7–10). Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
- Moore, M. G. (1991). Distance education theory. American Journal of Distance Education, 5(3), 1–6.
- Moore, M. G. (2013a). The historical and conceptual foundations: an overview. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 1–2). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Moore, M. G. (2013b). The theory of transactional distance. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 66–85). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Neubauer, B. J., Hug, R. W., Hamon, K. W., & Stewart, S. K. (2011). Using personal learning networks to leverage communities of practice in public affairs education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 17(1), 9–25.
- Pelz, B. (2004). (My) three principles of effective online pedagogy. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(3), 33–46.
- Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/192/274
- Saba, F. (2013). Building the future: A theoretical perspective. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 49–65). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Saba, F., & Shearer, R. L. (1994). Verifying the key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), 36–59.
- Shea, J., Joaquin, M. E., & Gorzycki, M. (2015). Hybrid course design: Considerations for promoting student engagement and success. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 21(4), 539–566.
- Shea, P., Swan, K., Li, C. S., & Pickett, A. (2005). Developing learning community in online asynchronous college courses: The role of teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(4), 59–82.
- Shearer, R. L. (2013). Theory to practice in instructional design. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 251–267). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Tolu, A. T., & Evans, L. S. (2012). Communities of inquiry: A review of historical developments. In Z. Akyol & D. R. Garrison (Eds), 2012. Educational communities of inquiry: Theoretical framework, research and practice (pp. 45–65). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
- Wheeler, S. (2007). The influence of communication technologies and approaches to study on transactional distance in blended learning. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 15(2), 103–117.