What Makes a Good School Leadership Program? A Qualitative Study of the Lookstein Center Educational Leadership Advancement Initiative (ELAI)

References

• Ambrosetti, A., Knight, B. A., & Dekkers, J. (2014). Maximizing the potential of mentoring: A framework for pre-service teacher education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 22(3), 224–239. doi:10.1080/13611267.2014.926662
   Google Scholar
• American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (2001). PK-12 educational leadership and administration (White paper). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, S. (2013, July). Final project evaluation of the Lookstein Center Education Leadership Advancement Initiative (ELAI) 2012-2013—Cohort III (Internal paper). Ramat Gan, Israel: Bar Ilan University, The Lookstein Center.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, B., & Muse, I. (1993). Cohort groups in educational administration. Journal of School Leadership, 3, 400–426.
   Google Scholar
• Basom, M., Yerkes, D., Norris, C., & Barnett, B. G. (1996). Developing educational leaders: A working model. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, R. (2014). Teacher mentoring as a means to improve schools. BU Journal of Graduate Studies in Education, 6(1), 47–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cienkus, R. C., Haworth, J. G., & Kavanagh, J. A. (Eds.). (1996). Mentorsand mentoring [Special issue]. Peabody Journal of Education, 71(1).
   Google Scholar
• Copland, M. A. (1999). Problem-based learning, problem-framing ability and the principal selves of prospective school principals. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(08), 2750.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, andmixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., Meyerson, D., Orr, M. T., & Cohen, C. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development program. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S., Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., & Meyerson, D. (2005). School leadership study: Developing successful principals (Review of research). Palo Alto, CA:Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 735–744. doi:10.2307/3069307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eby, L. T., Rhodes, J. E., & Allen, T. D. (2007). Definition and evolution of mentoring. In T. D. Allen, & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach (pp. 7–20). Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, E., Winter, J. S., & Bressman, S. (2012). Toward a more effective mentoring model: An innovative program of collaboration. Journal of Jewish Education, 78(4), 331–361
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership.Washington, DC: The Albert Shanker Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233. doi:10.3102/0034654311403323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerry, T., & Mayes, A. S. (2014). Issues in mentoring. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, M. S., Copland, M. A., & Talbert, J. E. (2003). Leading for learning:Reflective tools for school and district leaders (Research report). Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning (Learning From Leadership Project Executive Summary). New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Looney, J. (2008). Research in mentoring and induction in Christian schools. Journal of the International Community of Christians in Teacher Education, 3(2), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M. (1999). The evolution of educational leadership preparation programs. In J. Murphy, & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration:A project of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 119–239). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., & Vriesenga, M. (2004). Research on preparation programs in educational administration: An analysis. Columbia: University of Missouri-Columbia, University Council for Educational Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Muszkat-Barkan, M. (2011). Mentoring: Ideological encounters—Mentoring teachers in Jewish education. In H. Miller, L. D. Grant, & A. Pomson (Eds.), International handbook of Jewish education (Vol. 5, pp. 879–900). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, J. M. (1999). Preparation of the urban principal. Dissertation Abstracts, 60(03), 609.
   Google Scholar
• Orland-Barak, L. (2002). What’s in a case? What mentors’ cases reveal about the practice of mentoring. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(4), 451–468. doi:10.1080/00220270110091140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, M. T., & Barber, M. E. (2005). Collaborative leadership preparation: A comparative study of innovative programs and practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, QC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. ( 202). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, K. D. (2002). The professional development of principals: Innovations and opportunities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 213–232. doi:10.1177/0013161X02382006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, K. D., & Kelley, C. J. (2002). Principal in-service programs: A portrait of diversity and promise. In M. S. Tucker, & J. B. Codding (Eds.), The principal challenge (pp. 313–346). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rotstein, E. L. (2011). Renew and reflect: R and R for Jewish education mentors. Journal of Jewish Education, 77(2), 98–115. doi:10.1080/15244113.2011.569980
   Google Scholar
• Schick, M. (2014), October. A census of Jewish day schools in the United States–2013-14. New York, NY: Avi Chai Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Templeton, N. R., & Tremont, J. W. (2014). Improving professional practice: Mentoring as job-embedded professional development. Texas Study, 2(13), 24–26.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, A. D. (2014). Mentoring program: New faculty induction program. Duluth, GA: Georgia Connections Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, P. A., Rinehart, J. S., & Muñoz, M. A. (2002). Principal recruitment: An empirical evaluation of a school district’s internal pool of principal certified personnel. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16(2), 129–141. doi:10.1023/A:1020052312692
   Google Scholar
• Woocher, J., Woocher, M., (2014). Jewish education in a new century: An ecosystem in transition. In A. Dashefsky & I. Sheskin (Eds.), American Jewish year book 2013 (pp.279–358). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zander, A. F. (1982). Making groups effective. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, S. (2005). Teshuvah and mentoring: The CCAR process.CCAR Journal, 52(3), 22–33.
   Google Scholar