3,055
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Empirical Article

Attunement and Affordance Learning in Infants

, &

References

  • Adam, J. J., Buetti, S., & Kerzel, D. (2012). Coordinated flexibility: How initial gaze position modulates eye-hand coordination and reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 891. doi:10.1037/a0027592
  • Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1406.5823.
  • Bellagamba, F., & Tomasello, M. (1999). Re-enacting intended acts: Comparing 12-and 18-month-olds. Infant Behavior and Development, 22, 277–282. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(99)00002-8
  • Charman, T., & Huang, C. T. (2002). Delineating the role of stimulus enhancement and emulation learning in the behavioural re-enactment paradigm. Developmental Science, 5(1), 25–27. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00200
  • Corkum, V., & Moore, C. (1995). Development of joint visual attention in infants. In C. Moore & P. J. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 61–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 148–153. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.005
  • Danish, D., & Russell, J. (2007). The role of ‘action-effects’ and agency in toddlers’ imitation. Cognitive Development, 22, 69–76. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.08.001
  • de Bordes, P. F., Cox, R. F. A., Hasselman, F., & Cillessen, A. H. (2013). Toddlers’ gaze following through attention modulation: Intention is in the eye of the beholder. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 443–452. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.008
  • Deák, G. O., Krasno, A. M., Jasso, H., & Triesch, J. (2018). What leads to shared attention? Maternal cues and infant responses during object play. Infancy, 23(1), 4–28. doi:10.1111/infa.12204
  • Dejonckheere, P. J., Smitsman, A. W., & Verhofstadt-Denève, L. (2007). Occluding the trajectory of an object: Effects on predicting containment with 9-, 12-and 16-month-olds. Infant Behavior and Development, 30(3), 523–528. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.12.002
  • Doherty, M. J. (2006). The development of mentalistic gaze understanding. Infant and Child Development, 15(2), 179–186. doi:10.1002/icd.434
  • Fritz, J., Bisenberger, A., & Kotrschal, K. (2000). Stimulus enhancement in greylag geese: Socially mediated learning of an operant task. Animal Behaviour, 59(6), 1119–1125. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1424
  • Galef, B. G. (2013). Imitation and local enhancement: Detrimental effects of consensus definitions on analyses of social learning in animals. Behavioural Processes, 100, 123–130. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2013.07.026
  • Gergely, G., Bekkering, H., & Király, I. (2002). Developmental psychology: Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature, 415(6873), 755. doi:10.1038/415755a
  • Gibson, E. J. (1988). Exploratory behavior in the development of perceiving, acting, and the acquiring of knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 39(1), 1–42. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.39.020188.000245
  • Gibson, E. J., & Pick, A. D. (2000). An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Goldin-Meadow, S. (2007). Pointing sets the stage for learning language—And creating language. Child Development, 78(3), 741–745. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01029.x
  • Goldstein, M. H., & Schwade, J. A. (2008). Social feedback to infants’ babbling facilitates rapid phonological learning. Psychological Science, 19(5), 515–523. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02117.x
  • Grant, E. R., & Spivey, M. J. (2003). Eye movements and problem solving: Guiding attention guides thought. Psychological Science, 14(5), 462–466. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.02454
  • Gredebäck, G., Astor, K., & Fawcett, C. (2018). Gaze following is not dependent on ostensive cues: A critical test of natural pedagogy. Child Development. doi:10.1111/cdev.13026
  • Haith, M. M. (1998). Who put the cog in infant cognition? Is rich interpretation too costly? Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 167–179. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90001-7
  • Hellendoorn, A. (2014). Understanding social engagement in autism: Being different in perceiving and sharing affordances. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 850. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00850
  • Heyes, C. (2012). What’s social about social learning? Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126(2), 193. doi:10.1037/a0025180
  • Heyes, C. (2016). Born pupils? Natural pedagogy and cultural pedagogy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(2), 280–295. doi:10.1177/1745691615621276
  • Heyes, C. M., Ray, E. D., Mitchell, C. J., & Nokes, T. (2000). Stimulus enhancement: Controls for social facilitation and local enhancement. Learning and Motivation, 31(2), 83–98. doi:10.1006/lmot.1999.1041
  • Hopper, L. M. (2010). ‘Ghost’experiments and the dissection of social learning in humans and animals. Biological Reviews, 85(4), 685–701. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00120.x
  • Hoppitt, W., & Laland, K. N. (2013). Social learning: An introduction to mechanisms, methods, and models. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Horne, P. J., Erjavec, M., & Lovett, V. E. (2009). The effects of modelling, local stimulus enhancement, and affordance demonstration on the production of object-directed actions in 6-month old infants. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(2), 269–281. doi:10.1348/026151008X297126
  • Huang, C. T., & Charman, T. (2005). Gradations of emulation learning in infants’ imitation of actions on objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 276–302. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.06.003
  • Huang, C. T., Heyes, C., & Charman, T. (2002). Infants’ behavioral reenactment of” failed attempts”: Exploring the roles of emulation learning, stimulus enhancement, and understanding of intentions. Developmental Psychology, 38, 840. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.5.840
  • Ingold, T. (2001). From the transmission of representation to the education of attention. In H. Whitehouse (Ed.), The debated mind: Evolutionary psychology versus ethnography (pp. 113–153). New York, NY, US: Berg.
  • Ishak, S., Franchak, J. M., & Adolph, K. E. (2014). Perception–Action development from infants to adults: Perceiving affordances for reaching through openings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 117, 92–105. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.09.003
  • Johnson, S. C., Booth, A., & O’Hearn, K. (2001). Inferring the goals of a nonhuman agent. Cognitive Development, 16, 637–656. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(01)00043-0
  • Király, I. (2009). The effect of the model’s presence and of negative evidence on infants’ selective imitation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 14–25. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.06.003
  • Meagher, B. R., & Marsh, K. L. (2014). Testing an ecological account of spaciousness in real and virtual environments. Environment and Behavior, 47(7), 782–815. doi:10.1177/0013916514525039
  • Meltzoff, A. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 838. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.31.5.838
  • Michaels, C. F., & Carello, C. (1981). Direct perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Nielsen, M. (2006). Copying actions and copying outcomes: Social learning through the second year. Developmental Psychology, 42, 555. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.555
  • Paulus, M. (2011). How infants relate looker and object: Evidence for a perceptual learning account of gaze following in infancy. Developmental Science, 14(6), 1301–1310. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01076.x
  • Politis, D. N., & Romano, J. P. (1994). The stationary bootstrap. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(428), 1303–1313. doi:10.1080/01621459.1994.10476870
  • R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria.
  • Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70–76. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009
  • Senju, A., & Csibra, G. (2008). Gaze following in human infants depends on communicative signals. Current Biology, 18, 668–671. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.03.059
  • Shneidman, L., Todd, R., & Woodward, A. (2014). Why do child-directed interactions support imitative learning in young children? PloS One, 9(10), e110891. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110891
  • Southgate, V., Chevallier, C., & Csibra, G. (2009). Sensitivity to communicative relevance tells young children what to imitate. Developmental Science, 12, 1013–1019. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00861.x
  • Szufnarowska, J., Rohlfing, K. J., Fawcett, C., & Gredebäck, G. (2014). Is ostension any more than attention? Scientific Reports, 4, 5304. doi:10.1038/srep05304
  • Thelen, E., Schöner, G., Scheier, C., & Smith, L. B. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 1–34. doi:10.1017/S0140525X01003910
  • Thompson, D. E., & Russell, J. (2004). The ghost condition: Imitation versus emulation in young children’s observational learning. Developmental Psychology, 40(5), 882. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.882
  • Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Topál, J., Gergely, G., Miklósi, Á., Erdőhegyi, Á., & Csibra, G. (2008). Infants’ perseverative search errors are induced by pragmatic misinterpretation. Science, 321, 1831–1834. doi:10.1126/science.1161437
  • Vink, R., Hasselman, F., Cillessen, A. H., Wijnants, M. L., & Bosman, A. M. (2018). Does competence determine who leads in a dyadic cooperative task? A study of children with and without a neurodevelopmental disorder. Complexity, 2018. doi:10.1155/2018/5379531
  • Want, S. C., & Harris, P. L. (2002). How do children ape? Applying concepts from the study of non‐human primates to the developmental study of ‘imitation’ in children. Developmental Science, 5(1), 1–14. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00194
  • Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2013). Joint attention without gaze following: Human infants and their parents coordinate visual attention to objects through eye-hand coordination. PloS One, 8(11), e79659. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079659
  • Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2017). Multiple sensory‐motor pathways lead to coordinated visual attention. Cognitive Science, 41, 5–31. doi:10.1111/cogs.12366
  • Zentall, T. R. (2001). Imitation in animals: Evidence, function, and mechanisms. Cybernetics and Systems, 32, 53–96. doi:10.1080/019697201300001812