Is this for me? How Consumers Respond to Personalized Advertising on Social Network Sites

REFERENCES

• Abrahamse, Wokje, Linda Steg, Charles Vlek, and Talib Rothengatter (2007), “The Effect of Tailored Information, Goal Setting, and Tailored Feedback on Household Energy Use, Energy-Related Behaviors, and Behavioral Antecedents,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27 (4), 265–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AdEspresso (2014), “Types of Facebook Ads,” June 26, http://adespresso.com/academy/guides/ffacebook-ads-typ/facebook-ads-types/.
   Google Scholar
• Ahluwalia, Rohini, H. Rao Unnava, and Robert E. Burnkrant (2001), “The Moderating Role of Commitment on the Spillover Effect of Marketing Communications,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (4), 458–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, Icek (2002), “Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32 (4), 665–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand, Bharat N., and Ron Shachar (2009), “Targeted Advertising As a Signal,” Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 7 (3), 237–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antheunis, Marjolijn L., and Guda van Noort (2012), “Personalized Advertising Campaigns in Social Network Sites: Are There Potential Hazards or Opportunities?,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Advertising, S. Rosengren and M. Dahlén, eds., Stockholm, Sweden: European Advertising Academy, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, Christopher, and Mark Conner (2001), “Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Meta-Analytic Review,” British Journal of Social Psychology, 40 (4), 471–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, Neeraj, Xavier Dreze, Anindya Ghose, James D. Hess, Raghuram Iyengar, Bing Jing, et al. (2008), “Putting One-to-One Marketing to Work: Personalization, Customization, and Choice,” Marketing Letters, 19 (3/4), 305–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, Lars, and John R. Rossiter (2008), “The Role of Ad Likability in Predicting an Ad's Campaign Performance,” Journal of Advertising, 37 (2), 85–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettman, James R., Mary Frances Luce, and John W. Payne (1998), “Constructive Consumer Choice Processes,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (3), 187–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright, Laura F., and Terry Daugherty (2012), “Does Customization Impact Advertising Effectiveness? An Exploratory Study of Consumer Perceptions in Advertising in Customized Online Environments,” Journal of Marketing Communications, 18 (1), 19–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, Gordon C. II, and Anand Kumar (2000), “Web Commercials and Advertising Hierarchy-of-Effects,” Journal of Advertising Research, 40 (1/2), 35–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Qimei, Sandra J. Clifford, and William D. Wells (2002), “Attitude toward the Site. II: New Information,” Journal of Advertising Research, 42 (2), 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, and William D. Wells (1999), “Attitude toward the Site,” Journal of Advertising Research, 39 (5), 27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, Hung-Chang, Yi-Ching Hsieh, Ya-Hui Kao, and Monle Lee (2007), “The Determinants of Email Receivers' Disseminating Behaviors on the Internet,” Journal of Advertising Research, 47 (4), 524–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Chang-Hoan (1999), “How Advertising Works on the WWW: Modified Elaboration Likelihood Model,” Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 21 (1), 33–50.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, Shu-Chuan (2011), “Viral Advertising in Social Media: Participation in Facebook Groups and Responses among College-Aged Users,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12 (1), 30–43.
   Google Scholar
• De Cannière, Marie Hélène, Patrick De Pelsmacker, and Maggie Geuens (2009), “Relationship Quality and the Theory of Planned Behavior Models of Behavioral Intentions and Purchase Behavior,” Journal of Business Research, 62 (1), 82–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar, Ravi, and Klaus Wertenbroch (2000), “Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods,” Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (1), 60–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, Arie (2005), “Working Mechanisms of Computer-Tailored Health Education: Evidence from Smoking Cessation,” Health Education Research, 20 (5), 527–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, Nicole B., Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe (2007), “The Benefits of Facebook ‘Friends': Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (4), 1143–68.
   Google Scholar
• Euromonitor International (2015), “Fragrances in Belgium,” July, http://www.euromfragrances-in-belgiu/fragrances-in-belgium/report.
   Google Scholar
• Facebook (2014), “Facebook Reports Third Quarter Results 2014,” October 28, http://investor.fb.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=878726.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, Nikolaus, Peter Keinz, and Christoph J. Steger (2009), “Testing the Value of Customization: When Do Customers Really Prefer Products Tailored to Their Preferences?,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (5), 103–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, and Martin Schreier (2008), “Product Uniqueness as a Driver of Customer Utility in Mass Customization,” Marketing Letters, 19 (2), 93–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, ———, and Ulrike Kaiser (2010), “The ‘I Designed It Myself’ Effect in Mass Customization,” Management Science, 56 (1), 125–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, Ronald E., and Barbara A. Lafferty (2002), “Consumer Response to Web Sites and Their Influence on Advertising Effectiveness,” Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 12 (4), 313–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, Mary Ellen, Kim McKeage, and Mark Alexander Fox (1998), “Relationship Marketing Effectiveness: The Role of Involvement,” Psychology and Marketing, 15 (5), 443–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, Robert P., Matthew Kreuter, Kenneth Resnicow, Martin Fishbein, and Aire Dijkstra (2008), “Understanding Tailoring in Communication About Health,” Health Education Research, 23 (3), 454–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, Andrew F. (2013), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Daniel J., and Roger A. Kerin (2004), “The Effects of Personalized Product Recommendations on Advertising Response Rates: The ‘Try This. It Works!’ Technique,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (3), 271–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy, Mariea Grubbs, andGeorge Milne (2010), “Gender Differences in Privacy-Related Measures for Young Adult Facebook Users,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10 (2), 28–45.
   Google Scholar
• “IAB Display Advertising Guidelines,” (2015), Interactive Advertising Bureau, August 17, http://www.iab.net/about_the_iab/recent_press_releases/press_release_archive/press_release/pr-020226_adportfolio.
   Google Scholar
• Iyer, Ganesh, David Soberman, and J. Miguel Villas-Boas (2005), “The Targeting of Advertising,” Marketing Science, 24 (3), 461–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyanaraman, Sriram, and S. Shyam Sundar (2006), “The Psychological Appeal of Personalized Content in Web Portals: Does Customization Affect Attitudes and Behavior?,” Journal of Communication, 56 (1), 110–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, Louise, Gayle Kerr, and Judy Drennan (2010), “Avoidance of Advertising in Social Networking Sites: The Teenage Perspective, ”Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10 (2), 16–27.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Nam Young, and S. Shyam Sundar (2008), “What's Relevance Got to Do with It? A Moderated Mediation Exploration of the Appeal of Personalization in Websites,” in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting International Communication Association, F. Cooren, J. Taylor, C. Andre, J. McDonald, and E. Pelletier, eds., Montreal: International Communication Association, pp. 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, Thomas (2007), “The Effect of Measurement Task Transparency on Preference Construction and Evaluations of Personalized Recommendations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (2), 224–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, Suri Spolter-Weisfeld, and Maneesh Thakkar (2007), “The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Consumer Response to Personalization,” Marketing Science, 26 (2), 246–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku, Yi-Cheng, Tsai-Hsin Chu, and Chen-Hsiang Tseng (2013), “Gratifications for Using CMC Technologies: A Comparison among SNS, IM, E-Mail,” Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (1), 226–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, Eun Sook, and Yongjun Sung (2011), “Follow Me! Global Marketers' Twitter Use,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12 (1), 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Yih Hwai (2000), “Manipulating Ad Message Involvement through Information Expectancy: Effects on Attitude Evaluation and Confidence,” Journal of Advertising, 29 (2), 29–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Yoon-Joo, and Ho-Young Ahn (2013), “Interaction Effects of Perceived Sponsor Motives and Facebook Credibility on Willingness to Visit Social Cause Facebook Page,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 13 (1), 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Magna Global (2013), “Magna Global: Advertising Forecasts: 2014,” December 9, http://news.ipgmediabrands.com/ipgmediabrands/press-releases/magna-global-advertising-forecast-2014-ipg-mediabrands.print.
   Google Scholar
• Maslowska, Ewa, Edith Smit, and Bas van denPutte (2011), “Examining the (in)Effectiveness of Personalized Communication,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Research in Advertising, M. Eisend and T. Langner, eds., Berlin, Germany: European Advertising Academy, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Bas van den Putte, and Edith G. Smit (2011), “The Effectiveness of Personalized E-Mail Newsletters and the Role of Personal Characteristics,” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14 (12), 765–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, Christian, and Rona Wiegmann (2011), “Effectiveness of Advertising on Social Network Sites: A Case Study on Facebook,” in Information and Communication Techologies in Tourism 2011, R. Law, M. Fuchs, and F. Ricci, eds., Innsbruck, Austria: Springer Verlag-Wien, 485–98.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2014), “E-Commerce: Evolution or Revolution in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods World?,” August 26, http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2014/e-commerce-evolution-or-revolution-in-the-fast-moving-consumer-goods-world.html.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, Richard E., and Timothy DeCamp Wilson (1977), “Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes,” Psychological Review, 84 (3), 231–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noar, Seth M., Christina N. Benac, and Melissa S. Harris (2007), “Does Tailoring Matter? Meta-Analytic Review of Tailored Print Health Behavior Change Interventions,” Psychological Bulletin, 133 (4), 673–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, Nancy G. Harrington, and Rosalie S. Aldrich (2009), “The Role of Message Tailoring in the Development of Persuasive Health Communication Messages,” in Communication Yearbook 33, Christina S. Beck, ed., New York: Routledge, 73–133.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Hyojung, Shelly Rodgers, and Jon Stemmle (2011), “Health Organizations' Use of Facebook for Health Advertising and Promotion,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12 (1), 62–77.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlou, Paul A., and David W. Stewart (2000), “Measuring the Effects and Effectiveness of Interactive Advertising: A Research Agenda,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1 (1), 62–78.
   Google Scholar
• Percy, Larry, and John R. Rossiter (1992), “A Model of Brand Awareness and Brand Attitude Advertising Strategies,” Psychology and Marketing, 9 (4), 263–74.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, Richard E., Jamie S. Barden, and Christian S. Wheeler (2002), “The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Developing Health Promotions for Sustained Behavioral Change,” in Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research, R.J. DiClemente, R.A. Crosby, and M. Kegler, eds., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 71–99.
   Google Scholar
• ———, and Pablo Briñol (2010), “Attitude Change,” in Advanced Social Psychology: The State of the Science, Roy F. Baumeister and Eli J. Finkel, eds., Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 217–59.
   Google Scholar
• ———, and John T. Cacioppo (1986), “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205.
   Google Scholar
• Quan-Haase, Anabel, and Alyson L. Young (2010), “Uses and Gratifications of Social Media: A Comparison of Facebook and Instant Messaging,” Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society, 30 (5), 350–61.
   Google Scholar
• Rimer, Barbara K., and Matthew W. Kreuter (2006), “Advancing Tailored Health Communication: A Persuasion and Message Effects Perspective,” Journal of Communication, 56 (1), 184–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, Shelly, and Esther Thorson (2000), “The Interactive Advertising Model: How Users Perceive and Process Online Ads,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1 (1), 42–61.
   Google Scholar
• Romeo, Jean B., and Kathleen Debevec (1992), “An Investigation of Self-Referencing's Influence on Affective Evaluations,” Advances in Consumer Research, 19, 290–95.
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter, John R., and Larry Percy (1997), Advertising and Promotion Management, 2nd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Saxena, Anant, and Uday Khanna (2013), “Advertising on Social Nework Sites: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach,” Vision, 17 (1), 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Sheeran, Paschal (2002), “Intention–Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review,” European Review of Social Psychology, 12 (1), 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Sheng, Hong, Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah, and Keng Siau (2008), “An Experimental Study on Ubiquitous Commerce Adoption: Impact of Personalization and Privacy Concerns,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9 (6), 344–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonson, Itamar (2005), “Determinants of Customers' Responses to Customized Offers: Conceptual Framework and Research Propositions,” Journal of Marketing, 69 (1), 32–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohl, Stephanie J, and Anne Moyer (2007), “Tailored Interventions to Promote Mammography Screening: A Meta-Analytic Review,” Preventive Medicine, 45 (4), 252–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadd, Allison (2014), “U.S. Social Advertising Spend Expected to Increase to $11 Billion by 2017,” January 9, https://www.mediabistro.com/alltwitter/u-s-social-advertising_b53866.
   Google Scholar
• Statista (2015), “Most Popular Social Media Websites in the United States in December 2014, Based on Share of Visits,” http://www.statista.com/statistics/265773/market-share-of-the-most-popular-social-media-websites-in-the-us/.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, Julie S., Gordon C. Bruner, II, and Anand Kumar (2000), “Webpage Background and Viewer Attitudes,” Journal of Advertising Research, 40 (1–2), 29–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. Shyam, and Sampada S. Marathe (2010), “Personalization versus Customization: The Importance of Agency, Privacy, and Power Usage,” Human Communication Research, 36 (3), 298–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam, Kar Yan, and Shuk Ying Ho (2005), “Web Personalization as a Persuasion Strategy: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective,” Information Systems Research, 16 (3), 271–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, and ——— (2006), “Understanding the Impact of Web Personalization on User Information Processing and Decision Outcomes,” MIS Quarterly, 30 (4), 865–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, David G., Jeffrey E. Lewin, and David Strutton (2011), “Friends, Fans, and Followers: Do Ads Work on Social Networks?,” Journal of Advertising Research, 51 (1), 258–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, David Strutton, and Kenneth Thompson (2012), “Self-Enhancement As a Motivation for Sharing Online Advertising,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12 (2), 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Trusov, Michael, Randolph E. Bucklin, and Koen Pauwels (2009), “Effects of Word-of-Mouth versus Traditional Marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking Site,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (5), 90–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, Catherine E. (2014), “Social Networks, Personalized Advertising and Privacy Controls,” Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (5), 546–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turow, Joseph, Jennifer King, Chris Jay Hoofnatle, Amy Bleakley, and Michael Hennessy (2009), “Americans Reject Tailored Advertising and Three Activities That Enable It,” September 29, doi:10.2139/ssrn.1478214
   Google Scholar
• Van Ittersum, Koert (2012), “The Effect of Decision Makers' Time Perspective on Intention-Behavior Consistency,” Marketing Letters, 23 (1), 264–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Noort, Guda, and Lotte M. Willemsen (2012), “Online Damage Control: The Effects of Proactive versus Reactive Webcare Interventions in Consumer-Generated and Brand-Generated Platforms,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26 (3), 131–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, Monica S., Peter S. Hendricks, and Thomas H. Brandon (2007), “Expectancy Priming of Smoking Cessation Messages Enhances the Placebo Effect of Tailored Interventions,” Health Psychology, 26 (5), 598–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, Chen, Bernard C.Y. Tan, and Klarissa Ting-Ting Chang (2009), “Advertising Effectiveness on Social Network Sites: An Investigation of Tie Strength, Endorser Expertise, and Product Type on Consumer Purchase Intention,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems. Paper 151. http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2009/151
   Google Scholar
• White, Tiffany Barnett, Debra L. Zahay, Helge Thorbjørnsen, and Sharon Shavitt (2008), “Getting Too Personal: Reactance to Highly Personalized Email Solicitation,”Marketing Letters, 19 (1), 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Jay, and Brenda Cude (2009), “‘Hello, Mrs. Sarah Jones! We Recommend This Product!’ Consumers' Perceptions About Personalized Advertising: Comparisons across Advertisements Delivered Via Three Different Types of Media,” International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33 (4), 503–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne (1985), “Measuring the Involvement Construct,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (3), 341–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, Fue, Li Huang, and Wenyu Dou (2009), “Social Factors in User Perceptions and Responses to Advertising in Online Social Networking Communities,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10 (1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Xinshu, John G. Lynch, Jr., and Qimei Chen (2010), “Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths About Mediation Analysis,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (2), 197–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar