Perceived Control or Haptic Sensation? Exploring the Effect of Image Interactivity on Consumer Responses to Online Product Displays

References

• Ariely, Dan (2000), “Controlling the Information Flow: Effects on Consumers’ Decision Making and Preferences,” Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (2), 233–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasel, S. Adam, and James Gips (2014) “Tablets, Touchscreens, and Touchpads: How Varying Touch Interfaces Trigger Psychological Ownership and Endowment,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (2), 226–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano, Marta Blazquez, Patsy Perry, Rachel Ashman, and Kathryn Waite (2017), “The Influence of Image Interactivity upon User Engagement When Using Mobile Touch Screens,” Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 406–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crites, Stephen L., Leandre R. Fabrigar, and Richard E. Petty (1994), “Measuring the Affective and Cognitive Properties of Attitudes: Conceptual and Methodological Issues,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20 (6), 619–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabholkar, Pratibha A., and Xiaojing Sheng (2009), “The Role of Perceived Control and Gender in Consumer Reactions to Download Delays,” Journal of Business Research, 62 (7), 756–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daugherty, Terry, Hairong Li, and Frank Biocca (2008), “Consumer Learning and the Effects of Virtual Experience Relative to Indirect and Direct Product Experience,” Psychology and Marketing, 25 (7), 568–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebisch, Sjoerd J.H., Mauro G. Perrucci, Antonio Ferretti, Cosimo Del Gratta, Gian Luca Romani, and Vittorio Gallese (2008), “The Sense of Touch: Embodied Simulation in a Visuotactile Mirroring Mechanism for Observed Animate or Inanimate Touch,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20 (9), 1611–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, Yang (2018), “Facilitator or Inhibitor? The Use of 360-Degree Videos for Immersive Brand Storytelling,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 18 (1), 28–42.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, Yang, and Quan Xie (2019), “Privacy Concerns, Perceived Intrusiveness, and Privacy Controls: An Analysis of Virtual Try-On Apps,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19 (1), 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Fiore, Ann Marie, and Hyun-Jeong Jin (2003), “Influence of Image Interactivity on Approach Responses towards an Online Retailer,” Internet Research, 13 (1), 38–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiore, Ann Marie, Jihyun Kim, and Hyun-Hwa Lee (2005), “Effect of Image Interactivity Technology on Consumer Responses toward the Online Retailer,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19 (3), 38–53.
   Google Scholar
• Hanus, Michael D., and Jesse Fox (2017), “Source Customization Reduces Psychological Reactance to a Persuasive Message via User Control and Identity Perceptions,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 17 (1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, Andrew F. (2018), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, Elizabeth C. (1986), “The Effect of Verbal and Pictorial Advertising Stimuli on Aesthetic, Utilitarian, and Familiarity Perceptions,” Journal of Advertising, 15 (2), 27–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, Morris B., and Elizabeth C. Hirschman (1982), “The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (2), 132–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homburg, Christian, Nicole Koschate, and Wayne D. Hoyer (2005), “Do Satisfied Customers Really Pay More? A Study of the Relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Willingness to Pay,” Journal of Marketing, 69 (2), 84–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, Michael K., and John E.G. Bateson (1991), “Perceived Control and the Effects of Crowding and Consumer Choice on the Service Experience,” Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (2), 174–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keysers, Christian, Bruno Wicker, Valeria Gazzola, Jean-Luc Anton, Leonardo Fogassi, and Vittorio Gallese (2004), “A Touching Sight: SII/PV Activation During the Observation and Experience of Touch,” Neuron, 42 (2), 335–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Keunyeong, Michael G. Schmierbach, Mun-Young Chung, Julia Daisy Fraustino, Frank Dardis, and Lee Ahern (2015), “Is It a Sense of Autonomy, Control, or Attachment? Exploring the Effects of In-Game Customization on Game Enjoyment,” Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 695–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Minjeong, and Sharron Lennon (2008), “The Effects of Visual and Verbal Information on Attitudes and Purchase Intentions in Internet Shopping,” Psychology and Marketing, 25 (2), 146–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Nam Young (2018), “The Effect of Ad Customization and Ad Variation on Internet Users’ Perceptions of Forced Multiple Advertising Exposures and Attitudes,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 18 (1), 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Hairong, Terry Daugherty, and Frank Biocca (2001), “Characteristics of Virtual Experience in Electronic Commerce: A Protocol Analysis,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15 (3), 13–30.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Hairong, Terry Daugherty, and Frank Biocca (2002), “Impact of 3-D Advertising on Product Knowledge, Brand Attitude, and Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Presence,” Journal of Advertising, 31 (3), 43–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Yang, Zhenhui Jiang, and Hock Chuan Chan (2019), “Touching Products Virtually: Facilitating Consumer Mental Imagery with Gesture Control and Visual Presentation,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 36 (3), 823–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Yuping, and L.J. Shrum (2002), “What Is Interactivity and Is It Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person, and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Advertising, 31 (4), 53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, Jeeyun, and Eunjoo Jin (2018), “Interactivity Benefits Low Self-Efficacy Smokers More: The Combinatory Effects of Interactivity and Self-Efficacy on Defensive Response and Quitting Intention,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 18 (2), 110–24.
   Google Scholar
• Overmars, Suzanne, and Karolien Poels (2015), “Online Product Experiences: The Effect of Simulating Stroking Gestures on Product Understanding and the Critical Role of User Control,” Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 272–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Jihye, Leslie Stoel, and Sharron J. Lennon (2008), “Cognitive, Affective, and Conative Responses to Visual Simulation: The Effects of Rotation in Online Product Presentation,” Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 7 (1), 72–87.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Ellen A. (1996), “A Guide to Constructs of Control,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 (3), 549–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steuer, Jonathan (1992), “Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions Determining Telepresence,” Journal of Communication, 42 (4), 73–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhagen, Tibert, Charlotte Vonkeman, and Willemijn van Dolen (2016), “Making Online Products More Tangible: The Effect of Product Presentation Formats on Product Evaluations,” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19 (7), 460–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar