https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8135-6786
REFERENCES
- Abelson, J., P.-G. Forest, J. Eyles, P. Smith, E. Martin, and F.-P. Gauvin. 2003. Deliberations about deliberative methods: Issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science & Medicine 57(2): 239–251.
- Beresford, P. 2013. Beyond the usual suspects: Towards inclusive user involvement: Findings. London: Shaping Our Lives Publ.
- Bonevski, B., Randell, M. C. Paul, K., et al. 2014. Reaching the hard-to-reach: A systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology 14(1): 42. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-42.
- Brett, J., Staniszewska, S. C. Mockford, S., et al. 2014. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: A systematic review. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy 17(5): 637–650. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x.
- Brett, J., S. Staniszewska, C. Mockford, K. Seers, S. Herron-Marx, and H. Bayliss. 2010. The PIRICOM Study: A systematic review of the conceptualisation, measurement, impact and outcomes of patients and public involvement in health and social care research. Coventry, UK: University of Warwick.
- Domecq, J. P., G. T. Prutsky, Z. Elraiyah, et al. 2014. Patient engagement in research: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research 14(1): 89.
- Dudley, L., C. J. Gamble, D. Preston, et al. 2015. What difference does patient and public involvement make and what are its pathways to impact? Qualitative study of patients and researchers from a cohort of randomised clinical trials. PloS One 10(6): e0128817–e0128817. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128817.
- Kalathil, J. 2013. Hard to reach? Racialised groups and mental health service user involvement. In Mental health service users in research: Critical sociological perspectives, ed. P. Staddon, 121–133. Bristol: The Policy Press.
- McCoy, M. S., K. R. Jongsma, P. Friesen., et al. 2018. National standards for public involvement in research: Missing the Forest for the trees. Journal of Medical Ethics 44: 801–804.
- Rose, D., P. Fleischmann, F. Tonkiss, P. Campbell, and T. Wykes. 2002. User and carer involvement in change management in a mental health context: Review of the literature. Report to the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organization R & D London: Service User Research Enterprise, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park.
- Rutter, D., C. Manley, T. Weaver, M. J. Crawford, and N. Fulop. 2004. Patients or partners? Case studies of user involvement in the planning and delivery of adult mental health services in London. Social Science & Medicine 58(10): 1973–1984. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00401-5.
- Staley, K. 2009. Exploring impact: Public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh: INVOLVE.
- Staniszewska, S., N. Jones, M. Newburn, and S. Marshall. 2007. User involvement in the development of a research bid: Barriers, enablers and impacts. Health Expectations 10(2): 173–183. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00436.x.
- Su, C. 2018. Towards new ethics protocols for community-based research. URBAN Research Network Working Paper 2018. Available at: https://urbanresearchnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/community-protocols-urban.pdf
- Wallcraft, J., J. Read, and A. Sweeney. 2003. On our own terms: Users and survivors of mental health services working together for support and change. London: The Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.
- Wiggins, A., and J. Wilbanks. 2019. The rise of citizen science in health and biomedical research. American Journal of Bioethics 19(8): 3–14.