REFERENCES
- Beresford, P. 2005. Developing the theoretical basis for service user/Survivor-Led research and equal involvement in research. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 14(1): 4–9. doi: 10.1017/S1121189X0000186X.
- Cahn, E. 2000. No more throw-away people: The co-production imperative. Washington, D.C: Essential Books Ltd.
- Filipe, A., A. Renedo, and C. Marston. 2017. The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology 15(5): e2001403.doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403.
- Fiske, A., L. Del Savio, B. Prainsack, and A. Buyx. 2019. Conceptual and ethical considerations for citizen science in biomedicine. In Personal health science. Öffentliche wissenschaft und gesellschaftlicher wandel, ed. Nils B. Heyen, Sascha Dickel and Anne Brüninghaus, 195–217. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
- Lambert, N., and S. Carr. 2018. Outside the original remit’: Co‐production in UK mental health research, lessons from the field. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 27(4): 1273–1281. doi: 10.1111/inm.12499.
- Oliver, K., A. Kothari, and N. B. Mays. 2019. The dark side of coproduction: Do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? Health Research Policy and Systems 17(1): 33.doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3.
- Patel, V., S. C. Saxena, G. Lund, et al. 2018. The lancet commission on global mental health and sustainable development. The Lancet 392 (10157): 1553–1598. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31612-X.
- Pinfold, V., Szymczynska, P. S., Hamilton, R., et al. 2015. Co-production in mental health research: Reflections from the people study. Mental Health Review Journal 20(4): 220–331. doi: 10.1108/MHRJ-09-2015-0028.
- Resnik, D. B. 2019. Citizen scientists as human subjects: Ethical issues. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 4(1): 1–7.
- Shamoo, A. E., and D. B. Resnik. 2015. Responsible conduct of research. 3rd ed. New York: NY: Oxford University Press.