2,048
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Practices in State Self-Esteem Research: An Analysis of Enacted Ontologies

ORCID Icon

References

  • Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Donnellan, B. M., & Tisak, J. (2013). An Application of the LC-LSTM framework to the Self-Esteem Instability Case. Psychometrika, 78(4), 769–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-013-9326-4
  • Alessandri, G., Zuffianò, A., Vecchione, M., Donnellan, B. M., & Zuffianò, A. (2016). Evaluating the temporal structure and correlates of daily self-esteem using a trait state error framework (TSE). Self and Identity, 15(4), 394–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2015.1137223
  • Bickhard, M. H. (2009). The interactivist model. Synthese, 166(3), 547–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9375-x
  • Bickhard, M. H. (2011). Some consequences (and enablings) of process metaphysics. Axiomathes, 21(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-010-9130-z
  • Bloom, J. (2016). A Batesonian perspective on qualitative research and complex human systems. In M. Koopmans & D. Stamovlasis (Eds.), Complex dynamical systems in education: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 23–37). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27577-2
  • Chang, H. (2019). Is pluralism compatible with scientific realism? In The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism (Routledge) (pp. 176–186). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203712498-15
  • Chatham-Carpenter, A., & DeFrancisco, V. (1998). Women construct self-esteem in their own terms: A feminist qualitative study. Feminism & Psychology, 8(4), 467–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353598084005
  • Cigman, R. (2004). Situated Self-Esteem. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-8249.2004.00365.x
  • Clasen, P. C., Fisher, A. J., & Beevers, C. G. (2015). Mood-reactive self-esteem and depression vulnerability: Person-specific symptom dynamics via smart phone assessment. PLoS ONE, 10(7), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129774
  • Crowe, E., Daly, M., Delaney, L., Carroll, S., & Malone, K. M. (2019). The intra-day dynamics of affect, self-esteem, tiredness, and suicidality in Major Depression. Psychiatry Research, 279(February2018), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.02.032
  • DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage theory. Edinburgh University Press.
  • Delignières, D., Fortes, M., & Ninot, G. (2004). The fractal dynamics of self-esteem and physical self. Nonlinear Dynamics in Psychology and Life Sciences, 8 (4) , 479–510.
  • Derksen, M., & Morawski, J. (2022). Kinds of replication: Examining the meanings of “conceptual replication” and “direct replication.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(5), 1490–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211041116
  • De Ruiter, N. M. P. (2019). The nature of adolescents’ real-time self-esteem from a Dynamic Systems perspective: The Socially Embedded Self-Esteem model. In E. S. Kunnen, N. M. P. de Ruiter, B. F. Jeronimus, & M. A. E. an der Gaag (Eds.), Psychosocial development in adolescence: Insights from the dynamic systems approach (studies in adolescent development) (pp. 84–99). Routledge.
  • De Ruiter, J. P., & Albert, S. (2017). An appeal for a methodological fusion of conversation analysis and experimental psychology. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50, 1, 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1262050
  • De Ruiter, N. M. P., Den Hartigh, R. J. R., Cox, R. F. A., Van Geert, P. L. C., & Kunnen, E. S. (2015). The temporal structure of state self-esteem variability during parent–adolescent interactions: More than random fluctuations. Self and Identity, 14(3), 314–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2014.994026
  • De Ruiter, N. M. P., & Gmelin, J.-O.H. (2021). What is real about ‘real time’ anyway? A proposal for a pluralistic approach to studying identity processes across different timescales. Identity, 21(4), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2021.1969937
  • De Ruiter, N. M. P., Hollenstein, T., Van Geert, P. L. C., & Kunnen, E. S. (2018). Self-esteem as a complex dynamic system: Intrinsic and extrinsic microlevel dynamics. Complexity, 2018, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4781563
  • De Ruiter, N. M. P., Van Geert, P. L. C., & Kunnen, E. S. (2017). Explaining the “how” of self-esteem development: The self-organizing self-esteem model. Review of General Psychology, 21(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000099
  • Di Paolo, E. A., & De Jaegher, H. (2021). Enactive ethics: Difference becoming participation. Topoi, 41(September), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-021-09766-x
  • Donnellan, M. B., Kenny, D. A., Trzesniewski, K. H., Lucas, R. E., & Conger, R. D. (2012). Using trait-state models to evaluate the longitudinal consistency of global self-esteem from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(6), 634–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.07.005
  • Edwards, D. (2004). Discursive psychology. In Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 257–273). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429356032-4
  • Fearon, D. S. (2004). The bond threat sequence: Discourse evidence for the systematic interdependence of shame and social relationships. In C. Leach & L. Tiedens (Eds.), The social life of emotions (pp. 153–206). Cambrige University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511819568
  • Fortes, M., Delignières, D., & Ninot, G. (2004). The dynamics of self-esteem and physical self: Between preservation and adaptation. Quality & Quantity, 38(6), 735–751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-004-4764-9
  • Franz, D. J. (2022). “Are psychological attributes quantitative?” is not an empirical question: Conceptual confusions in the measurement debate. Theory and Psychology, 32(1), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211045340
  • Geukes, K., Nestler, S., Hutteman, R., Dufner, M., Küfner, A. C. P., Egloff, B., Denissen, J. J. A., & Back, M. D. (2017). Puffed-up but shaky selves: State self-esteem level and variability in narcissists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(5), 769–786.
  • Göncü, A. (2020). Self-esteem in time and place: How American families imagine, enact, and personalize a cultural ideal. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 27(3), 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1778728
  • Greenier, K., Kernis, M., McNamara, C., Waschull, S., Berry, A., Herlocker, C., & Abend, T. (1999). Individual differences in reactivity to daily events: Examining the roles of stability and level of self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 67(1), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00052
  • Gulbas, L. E. (2013). Embodying racism: Race, rhinoplasty, and self-esteem in Venezuela. Qualitative Health Research, 23(3), 326–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312468335
  • Hacking, I. (1995). The looping effects of human kinds. In D. Premack & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 351–383). Clarendon Press.
  • Hank, P., & Baltes-Götz, B. (2019). The stability of self-esteem variability: A real-time assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 79, 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.03.004
  • Hayes, A. M., Harris, M. S., & Carver, C. S. (2004). Predictors of self-esteem variability. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28(3), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COTR.0000031807.64718.b9
  • Hedegaard, M., Fleer, M., Bang, J., & Hviid, P. (2008). Studying children: A cultural-historical approach. Open University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741107400811
  • Hibberd, F. J. (2021). Psychology’s inertia: Epistemological and ethical implications. In J. T. Lamiell & K. L. Slaney (Eds.), Problematic Research Practices and Inertia in Scientific Psychology (pp. 23–38). Routledge.
  • Holden, M. T., & Lynch, P. (2004). Choosing the Appropriate Methodology: Understanding Research Philosophy. The Marketing Review, 4(4), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1362/1469347042772428
  • Hutteman, R., Nestler, S., Wagner, J., Egloff, B., & Back, M. D. (2014). Wherever I may roam: Processes of self-esteem development from adolescence to emerging adulthood in the context of international student exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(5), 767–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000015
  • Hutteman, R., Nestler, S., Wagner, J., Egloff, B., & Back, M. D. (2015). Wherever I may roam: Processes of self-esteem development from adolescence to emerging adulthood in the context of international student exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(5), 767–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000015
  • Kernis, M. (2005). Measuring self-esteem in context: The importance of stability of self-esteem in psychological functioning. Journal of Personality, 73(6), 1569–1605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00359.x
  • Kernis, M., Cornell, D., Sun, C., Berry, A., & Harlow, T. (1993). There’s more to self-esteem than whether it is high or low: The importance of stability of self-esteem. Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 65(6), 1190–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1190
  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press.
  • Leary, M. R. (1999). Making sense of self-esteem. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(00)
  • Leary, M. R., & Downs, D. (1995). Interpersonal functions of the self-esteem motive. In M. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, Agency and Self-esteem (pp. 123–144). Plenum Press.
  • Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 518–530. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.68.3.518
  • Levy, D. A. (2019). The “ self-esteem “ enigma: A critical analysis. North American Journal of Psychology, 21(2), 305–338.
  • Malafouris, L. (2019). Mind and material engagement. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 18(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9606-7
  • Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
  • Marshall, P. J. (2016). Embodiment and human development. Child Development Perspectives, 10(4), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12190
  • Maul, A. (2013). On the ontology of psychological attributes. Theory & Psychology, 23(6), 752–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354313506273
  • Mazereel, V., Vansteelandt, K., Menne-Lothmann, C., Decoster, J., Derom, C., Thiery, E., Rutten, B. P. F., Jacobs, N., van Os, J., Wichers, M., De Hert, M., Vancampfort, D., & van Winkel, R. (2021). The complex and dynamic interplay between self-esteem, belongingness and physical activity in daily life: An experience sampling study in adolescence and young adulthood. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 21(June), 100413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2021.100413
  • McGann, M., & de Jaegher, H. (2009). Self-other contingencies: Enacting social perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 417–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-009-9141-7
  • Miller, P. J., & Cho, G. E. (2017). Self-esteem in time and place: How American families imagine, enact, and personalize a cultural ideal. Oxford University Press.
  • Minelli, S., Ninot, G., Kozub, F. M., & De Potter, J.-C. (2003). Intra-individual variability of self-esteem in adolescents with spina bifida. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 26(4), 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mrr.0000102058.48781.e1
  • Morawski, J. G. (2005). Reflexivity and the psychologist. History of the Human Sciences, 18(4), 77–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695105058472
  • Morawski, J. (2014). Reflexivity. In: Teo, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_263
  • Morawski, J. (2022). How to true psychology’s objects. Review of General Psychology, 26(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211046518
  • Mund, M., Finn, C., Hagemeyer, B., Zimmermann, J., & Neyer, F. J. (2015). The dynamics of self-Esteem in partner relationships. European Journal of Personality, 29(2), 235–249 https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1984.
  • Ninot, G., Fortes, M., & Delignières, D. (2005). The dynamics of self-esteem in adults over a 6-month period: An exploratory study. The Journal of Psychology, 139(4), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.139.4.315-330
  • Oosterwegel, A., Field, N., Hart, D., & Anderson, K. (2001). The relation of self-esteem variability to emotion variability, mood, personality traits, and depressive tendencies. Journal of Personality, 69(5), 689–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.695160
  • Overton, W. F. (1991). The structure of developmental theory. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 23, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(08)60019-1
  • Overton, W. F. (2007). A coherent metatheory for dynamic systems: Relational organicism-contextualism. Human Development, 50, 154–159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000100944
  • Overton, W. F. (2013a). A new paradigm for developmental science: Relationism and relational-developmental systems. Applied Developmental Science, 17(2), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2013.778717
  • Overton, W. F. (2013b). Relationism and relational developmental systems: A paradigm for developmental science in the post-cartesian era. In Advances in Child Development and Behavior (Vol. 44 (ScienceDirect), Issue July 2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397947-6.00002-7
  • Overton, W. F. (2015). Processes, relations, and relationaldevelopmental-systems. In W. F. Overton, P. C. M. Molenaar, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Theory and method (pp. 9–62). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy102
  • Overton, W. F., & Lerner, R. M. (2014). Fundamental concepts and methods in developmental science: A relational perspective. Research in Human Development, 11(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2014.881086
  • Pilgrim, D. (2020). Critical Realism for Psychologists. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429274497
  • Pomagalska, D. (2005). The reification of self-esteem: Grammatical investigations into scientific and popular texts. [Doctoral dissertation. The University of Adelaide]. Repository Globethics.net. https://hdl.handle.net/2440/37812
  • Potter, J. (2003). Discursive psychology: Between method and paradigm. Discourse and Society, 14(6), 783–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265030146005
  • Raeff, C. (2010). Self constructing activities. Theory & Psychology, 20(1), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309345646
  • Raeff, C. (2017). Going where the action is to conceptualize the person. New Ideas in Psychology, 44, 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2016.11.006
  • Raeff, C. (2019). From objects to acting: Repopulating psychology with people who act. Theory & Psychology, 29(3), 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319844603
  • Raskin, J. D. (2020). Objecting, subjecting, and epistemic diversity. Theory and Psychology, 30(3), 394–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320914392
  • Rescher, N. (1996). Process metaphysics: An introduction to process philosophy. SUNY Press.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1986). Self-concept from middle childhood through adolescence. In J. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 3, pp. 107–135). Erlbaum.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Brown, K. W. (2003). Why we don’t need self-esteem: On fundamental needs, contingent love, and mindfulness. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 71–76.
  • Sabat, S. R., Fath, H., Moghaddam, F. M., & Harré, R. (1999). The maintenance of self-esteem: Lessons from the culture of Alzheimer’s sufferers. Culture and Psychology, 5(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9951001
  • Scheff, T. (2015). Three scandals in psychology: The need for a new approach. Review of General Psychology, 19(2), 203–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000047
  • Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 13(2), 238–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1951.tb00088.x
  • Srivastava, S., & Beer, J. S. (2005). How self-evaluations relate to being liked by others: Integrating sociometer and attachment perspectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 966–977. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.966
  • Strandell, J. (2017). Self-esteem in action: From direct causality to motive and mediator of self-performative action. Culture and Psychology, 23(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X16650835
  • Tafarodi, R. W., & Swann, W. B. (1995). Self-liking and self-competence as dimensions of global self-esteem: Initial validation of a measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65(2), 322–342. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6502_8
  • Teo, T. (2017). From psychological science to the psychological humanities: Building a general theory of subjectivity. Review of General Psychology, 21(4), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000132
  • Vallacher, R. R., Nowak, A., Froehlich, M., & Rockloff, M. (2002). The dynamics of self-evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(4), 370–379. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044055
  • Van Geert, P., & De Ruiter, N. (2022). Toward a process approach in psychology: Stepping into Heraclitus’ River. Cambridge University Press. https://org.proxy-ub.rug.nl/10.1017/9781108859189
  • Wagner, J., Lüdtke, O., & Trautwein, U. (2016). Self-esteem is mostly stable across young adulthood: Evidence from latent STARTS models. Journal of Personality, 84(4), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12178
  • Warren, B. (1992). Subjecting and objecting in personal construct psychology. In A. Thomson & P. Cummins (Eds.), European perspectives in personal construct psychology (pp. 57–66). European Personal Construct Association.
  • Westerman, M. A., & Steen, E. M. (2007). Going beyond the internal’external dichotomy in clinical psychology: The theory of interpersonal defense as an example of a participatory model. Theory & Psychology, 17(2), 323–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354307075048
  • Witherington, D. C. (2011). Taking emergence seriously: The centrality of circular causality for dynamic systems approaches to development. Human Development, 54(2), 66–92. https://doi.org/10.1159/000326814
  • Witherington, D. C., & Heying, S. (2015). The study of process and the nature of explanation in developmental science. Review of General Psychology, 19(3), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000033
  • Witherington, D. C., & Margett, T. E. (2011). How conceptually unified is the dynamic systems approach to the study of psychological development? Child Development Perspectives, 5(4), 286–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00211.x
  • Wong, A. E., Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (2014). Fractal dynamics in self-evaluation reveal self-concept clarity. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 18(4), 349–369.
  • Wong, A. E., Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (2016). Intrinsic dynamics of state self-esteem: The role of self-concept clarity. Personality and Individual Differences, 100, 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.024
  • Zeigler-Hill, V. (2011). The connections between self-esteem and psychopathology. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 41(3), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-010-9167-8
  • Zeigler-Hill, V., Holden, C. J., Enjaian, B., Southard, A. C., Besser, A., Li, H., & Zhang, Q. (2015). Self-Esteem instability and personality: The connections between feelings of self-worth and the big five dimensions of personality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214559719