372
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Is the Male Advantage in Mental-Rotation Performance Task Independent? On the Usability of Chronometric Tests and Paper-and-Pencil Tests in Children

, , , &

REFERENCES

  • Amorim, M.-A., Isableu, B., & Jarraya, M. (2006). Embodied spatial transformations: “Body analogy” for the mental rotation of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 327–347.
  • Bem, S.L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account for sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.
  • Bethell-Fox, C.E., & Shepard, R.N. (1988). Mental rotation: Effects of stimulus complexity and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 12–23.
  • Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676–713.
  • Casey, M.B. (1996). Understanding individual differences in spatial ability within females: A nature/nurture interactionist framework. Developmental Review, 16, 241–260.
  • Casey, M.B., Colon, D., & Goris, Y. (1992). Family handedness as a predictor of mental rotation ability among minority girls in a math-science training program. Brain and Cognition, 18, 88–96.
  • Connor, J.S., & Serbin, L.A. (1977). Sex differences in children's response to training on a visual-spatial test. Developmental Psychology, 13, 293–294.
  • Estes, D. (1998). Young children's awareness of their mental activity: The case of mental rotation. Child Development, 69, 1345–1360.
  • Geiser, C., Lehmann, W., Corth, M., & Eid, M. (2007). Quantitative and qualitative change in children's mental rotation performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 419–429.
  • Geiser, C., Lehmann, W., & Eid, M. (2006). Separating ‘rotators’ from ‘non-rotators’ in the mental rotations test: A multigroup latent class analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 261–293.
  • Geiser, C., Lehmann, W., & Eid, M. (2008). A note on sex differences in mental rotation in different age groups. Intelligence, 36, 556–563.
  • Glück, J., & Fabrizii, C. (2009). Gender differences in the mental rotations test are partly explained by response format. Journal of Individual Differences, 31, 106–109.
  • Halpern, D.F. (2011). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hausmann, M., & Güntürkün, O. (2000). Steroid fluctuations modify functional cerebral asymmetries: The hypothesis of progesterone-mediated interhemispheric decoupling. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1362–1374.
  • Heil, M., & Jansen, P. (2010). The relation between motor development and mental rotation ability in 5–6 years old children. European Journal of Developmental Science, 4, 66–74.
  • Heller, K., & Geisler, H.-J. (1983). KFT 1–3. Kognitiver Fähigkeits-Test (Grundschulform) [Cognitive-ability test (primary school version)]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz Test GmbH.
  • Jansen, P., Schmelter, A., Quaiser-Pohl, C., Neuburger, S., & Heil, M. (2012). Mental rotation performance in primary school age children: Are there gender differences in chronometric tests? Cognitive Development, 28, 51–62.
  • Jansen-Osmann, P., & Heil, M. (2006). Violation of pure insertion during mental rotation is independent of stimulus type, task, and subjects’ age. Acta Psychologica, 122, 280–287.
  • Jansen-Osmann, P., & Heil, M. (2007a). Developmental aspects of the laterality of ERP effects during mental rotation. NeuroReport, 18, 175–178.
  • Jansen-Osmann, P., & Heil, M. (2007b). Suitable stimuli to obtain (no) gender differences in the speed of cognitive processes involved in mental rotation. Brain and Cognition, 64, 217–227.
  • Jöckel, K.-H., Babitsch, B., Bellach, B.-M., Bloomfield, K., Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J. H. P., Winkler, J., & Wolf, C. (1998). Messung und quantifizierung soziodemografischer merkmale in epidemiologischen studien. In W. Ahrens, B.-M. Bellach, & K.-H. Jöckel (Eds.), Messung soziodemografischer Merkmale in der Epidemiologie (pp. 7–38). München, Germany: MMV Münchner Medizin Verlag.
  • Johnson, E.S., & Meade, A.C. (1987). Developmental patterns of spatial ability: An early sex difference. Child Development, 58, 725–740.
  • Jolicoeur, P., Regehr, S., Smith, L.B. J. P., & Smith, G.N. (1985). Mental rotation of representations of two-dimensional and three-dimensional objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39, 100–129.
  • Jordan, K., Heinze, J., Lutz, K., Kanowski, M., & Jäncke, L. (2001). Cortical activations during the mental rotation of different visual objects. Neuroimage, 13, 143–152.
  • Kail, R. (1993). Processing time decreases globally at an exponential rate during childhood and adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 254–265.
  • Kail, R., Pellegrino, J., & Carter, P. (1980). Developmental changes in mental rotation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 29, 102–116.
  • Kosslyn, S.M., Margolis, J.A., Barrett, A.M., & Goldknopf, E.J. (1990). Age differences in imagery abilities. Child Development, 61, 995–1010.
  • Levine, S.C., Vasilyeva, M., Lourenco, S.F., Newcombe, N.S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2005). Socioeconomic status modifies the sex difference in spatial skills. Psychological Science, 35, 940–949.
  • Linn, M.C., & Petersen, A.C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.
  • Marmor, G.S. (1975). Development of kinetic images: When does the child first represent movement in mental images? Cognitive Psychology, 7, 548–559.
  • Marmor, G.S. (1977). Mental rotation and number conservation: Are they related? Developmental Psychology, 13, 320–325.
  • McGee, M. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 889–918.
  • Moè, A. (2012). Gender difference does not mean genetic difference: Externalizing improves performance in mental rotation. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 20–24.
  • Moè, A., Meneghetti, C., & Cadinu, M. (2009). Women and mental rotation: Incremental theory and spatial strategy use enhance performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 187–191.
  • Moè, A., & Pazzaglia, F. (2006). Following the instructions! Effects of gender beliefs in mental rotation. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 369–377.
  • Moè, A., & Pazzaglia, F. (2010). Beyond genetics in mental rotation test performance. The power of effort attribution. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 464–468.
  • Neuburger, S., Heuser, V., Jansen, P., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2012). Influence of rotational axis and gender-stereotypical nature of rotation stimuli on the mental-rotation performance of male and female fifth graders. In C. Stachniss, K. Schill, & S. Uttal (Eds.), Spatial cognition 2012 (pp. 220–229). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Neuburger, S., Jansen, P., Heil, M., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2011). Gender differences in pre-adolescents’ mental-rotation performance: Do they depend on grade and stimulus type? Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1238–1242.
  • Neuburger, S., Jansen, P., Heil, M., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2012). A threat in the classroom: Gender stereotype activation and the cognitive performance of elementary-school children. Journal of Psychology, 22, 61–69.
  • Newcombe, N. (2002). The nativist-empiricist controversy in the context of recent research on spatial and quantitative development. Psychological Science, 13, 395–401.
  • Newcombe, N., & Frick, A. (2010). Early education for spatial intelligence: Why, what and how. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4, 102–111.
  • Peters, M., & Battista, C. (2008). Applications of mental rotation figures of the Shepard and Metzler Type and description of a mental rotation stimulus library. Brain and Cognition, 66, 260–264.
  • Peters, M., Laeng, B., Latham, K., Jackson, M., Zaiyouna, R., & Richardson, C. (1995). A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotation Test: Different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain and Cognition, 28, 39–58.
  • Pezzaris, E., & Casey, M. B. (1991). Girls who use “masculine” problem-solving strategies on a spatial task: Proposed genetic and environmental factors. , 17, 1–22.
  • Quaiser-Pohl, C., & Lehmann, W. (2002). Girls’ spatial abilities—Charting the contributions of experience and attitudes in different academic groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 245–260.
  • Quaiser-Pohl, C., Rohe, A., & Amberger, T. (2010). The solution strategy as an indicator of the developmental stage of pre-school children's mental-rotation ability. Journal of Individual Differences, 31, 95–100.
  • Rüsseler, J., Scholz, J., Jordan, K., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2005). Mental rotation of letters, pictures and three-dimensional objects in German dyslexic children. Journal of Child Neuropsychology, 11, 497–512.
  • Ruthsatz, V., Neuburger, S., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2012). The social relevance and the sociocultural origins of gender differences in spatial abilities. Folia Sociologica, 43, 17–32.
  • Sander, E., Quaiser-Pohl, C., & Stigler, C. (2010). Factors influencing the development of mental-rotation ability—The role of socio-cultural background. European Journal of Developmental Science, 4, 18–30.
  • Shepard, R.N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.
  • Sizonenko, P.C. (1978). Endocrinology in preadolescents and adolescents I. Hormonal changes during normal puberty. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 132, 704–712.
  • Snodgrass, J.G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Application to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50.
  • Snodgrass, J.G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215.
  • Titze, C., Jansen, P., & Heil, M. (2010). Mental rotation performance and the effect of gender in fourth graders and adults. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 432–444.
  • Vandenberg, S.G., & Kuse, A.R. (1978). Mental rotations. A group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599–604.
  • Vederhus, L., & Krekling, S. (1996). Sex differences in visual spatial ability in nine-year-old children. Intelligence, 23, 33–43.
  • Voyer, D. (2011). Time limits and gender differences on paper-and-pencil tests of mental rotation: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 267–277.
  • Voyer, D., Butler, T., Cordero, J., Brake, B., Silbersweig, D., Stern, E., & Imperato-McGinley, J. (2006). The relation between computerized and paper-and-pencil mental rotation tasks: A validation study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 928–939.
  • Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M.P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.
  • Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C.P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over fifty years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817–835.
  • Yuille, J.C., & Steiger, J.H. (1982). Nonholistic processing in mental rotation: Some suggestive evidence. Perception and Psychophysics, 31, 201–209.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.