1,013
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

The Priming Effect of Corruption and Bureaucracy Bashing on Citizens’ Perceptions of an Agency’s Performance

References

  • Arendt, F. (2012). A newspaper’s effect on the strength of automatic associations in memory. Journal of Media Psychology, 24(1), 1–8. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000057.
  • Arendt, F., & Marquart, F. (2015). Corrupt politicians? Media priming effects on overtly expressed stereotypes toward politicians. Communications, 40(2), 185–197. doi:10.1515/commun-2015-0003.
  • Belousova, V., Goel, R. K., & Korhonen, I. (2016). Corruption perceptions versus corruption incidence: Competition for rents across Russian regions. Journal of Economic Finance, 40(1), 172–187. doi:10.1007/s12197-014-9298-y.
  • Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057.
  • Berkovich, I. (2016). The corrupted industry and the “wagon-wheel effect”: A cross-country exploration of the government corruption on public service effectiveness. Administration and Society, 48(5), 559–579. doi:10.1177/0095399715607287.
  • Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001.
  • Brinkerhoff, D. W., Wetterberg, A., & Wibbels, E. (In press). Distance, services, and citizen perceptions of the state in rural Africa. Governance, 31(1), 103–124. doi:10.1111/gove.12271.
  • Bullock, J. B., Stritch, J. M., & Rainey, H. G. (2015). International comparison of public and private employees’ work motives, attitudes, and perceived rewards. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 479–489. doi:10.1111/puar.12356.
  • Caillier, J. G. (2010). Citizen trust, political corruption, and voting behavior: Connecting the dots. Politics and Policy, 38(5), 1015–135. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1346.2010.00267.x.
  • Caillier, J. G. (2017). Public service motivation and decisions to report wrongdoing in U.S. federal agencies: Is this relationship mediated by the seriousness of the wrongdoing. American Review of Public Administration, 47(7), 810–825. doi:10.1177/0275074015626299.
  • Charbonneau, É., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2015). Benchmarks and citizen judgments of local government performance: Findings from an experiment. Public Management Review, 17(2), 288–304. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.798027.
  • Chingos, M. M., Henderson, M., & West, M. R. (2012). Citizen perceptions of government service quality: Evidence from public school. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 7(4), 411–445. doi:10.1561/100.00011071.
  • Cordis, A. S., & Milyo, J. (2016). Measuring public corruption in the United States: Evidence from administrative records of federal prosecutions. Public Integrity, 18(2), 127–148. doi:10.1080/10999922.2015.1111748.
  • Del Monte, A., & Papagni, E. (2001). Public expenditure, corruption, and economic growth: The case of Italy. European Journal of Political Economy, 17(1), 1–16. doi:10.1016/s0176-2680(00)00025-2.
  • Doyle, E., & Lee, Y. A. (2016). Context, context, context: Priming theory and attitudes towards corporation in social media. Public Relations Review, 42(5), 913–919. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.09.005.
  • Druckman, J. N., & Kam, C. D. (2009). Students as experimental participants: A defense of the “narrow data base” (Working Paper 09–05). Evanston, IL: Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University. Retrieved from http://www.ipr.northwestern.edu/publications/papers/2009/ipr-wp-09-05.html
  • Faulkner, N., Martin, A,& Peyton, K. (2015). Priming political trust: Evidence from an experiment. Australian Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 164–173. doi:10.1080/10361146.2014.979759.
  • Ferrari, P. A., & Manzi, G. (2014). Citizens evaluate public services: A critical overview of statistical methods for analysing user satisfaction. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 17(3), 236–252. doi:10.1080/17487870.2014.909313.
  • Fishel, J. (1985). Presidents & promises: From campaign pledge to presidential performance. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
  • Garrett, S. R., & Thurber, J. A., Fritschler, A. L., & Rosenbloom, D. H. (2006). Assessing the impact of bureaucracy bashing by electoral campaigns. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 228–240. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00575.x.
  • Goodsell, C. T. (2006). A new vision for public administration. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 623–635. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00622.x.
  • Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust Web-bases studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93–104. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.2.93.
  • Graham, K. A., Ziegert, J. C., & Capitano, J. (2015). The effect of leadership style, framing, and promotion regulatory focus on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3), 423–436. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1952-3.
  • Grosso, A. L., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2011). How citizens view government performance reporting. Public Performance and Management Review, 35(2), 235–250. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576350201.
  • Groves, R. M. (2006). Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(5), 646–675. doi:10.1093/poq/nfl033.
  • Gupta, S., Davoodi, H., & Alonso-Terme, R. (1998). Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty? (Working Paper no. 98/76). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. doi:10.5089/9781451849844.001.
  • Hall, T. E. (2002). Live bureaucrats and dead public servants: How people in government are discussed on the floor of the House. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 242–251. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00174.
  • Ho, A. T., & Cho, W. (2017). Government communication effectiveness and satisfaction with police performance: A large-scale survey study. Public Administration Review, 77(2), 228–239. doi:10.1111/puar.12563.
  • Hubbell, L. (1991). Ronald Reagan as presidential symbol maker: The federal bureaucrat as loafer, incompetent buffoon, good ole boy, and tyrant. American Review of Public Administration, 21(3), 237–253. doi:10.1177/027507409102100305.
  • Hvidman, U., & Andersen, S. C. (2015). Perceptions of public and private performance: Evidence from a survey experiment. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 111–120. doi:10.1111/puar.12441.
  • James, O., Petersen, C., Jilke, S., & Van de Walle, S. (2015). Citizens’ blame of politicians for public service failure: Experimental evidence about blame reduction through delegation and contracting. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 83–93. doi:10.1111/puar.12471.
  • Kelly, J. M. (2003). Administrative performance measures: Is there really a link? Urban Affairs Review, 38(6), 855–866. doi:10.1177/1078087403038006005.
  • Khan, M. H. (1996). The efficiency implications of corruption. Journal of International Development, 8(5), 683–696. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1328(199609)8:5<683::aid-jid411>3.3.co;2-w.
  • Levi, M., Sacks, A., & Tyler, T. (2009). Conceptualizing legitimacy, measuring legitimating beliefs. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 354–375. doi:10.1177/0002764209338797.
  • Linde, J., & Erlingsson, G. O. (2013). The eroding effect of corruption on system support in Sweden. Governance, 26(4), 585–603. doi:10.1111/gove.12004.
  • Liu, C., & Mikesell, J. L. (2014). The impact of public officials’ corruption on the size and allocation of U.S. state spending. Public Administration Review, 74(3), 346–359. doi:10.1111/puar.12212.
  • Lumley, T., Diehr, P., Emerson, S., & Chen, L. (2002). The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets. Annual Review of Public Health, 23, 151–169. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140546.
  • Mason, D., Hillenbrand, C., & Money, K. (2014). Are informed citizens more trusting? Transparency of performance data and trust towards a British police force. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 321–341. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1702-6.
  • Meier, K. J., & Holbrook, T. M. (1992). “I seen my opportunities and I took ‘em”: Political corruption in the American states. Journal of Politics, 54(1), 135–155. doi:10.2307/2131647.
  • Melkers, J., & Thomas, J. C. (1998). What do administrators think citizens think? Administrator predictions as an adjunct to citizen surveys. Public Administration Review, 58(4), 327–334. doi:10.2307/977562.
  • Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Dworkin, T. M. (2008). Whistle-blowing in organizations. New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203809495.
  • Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30–62. doi:10.1177/0010414001034001002.
  • Overman, S. (In press). Autonomous agencies, happy citizens? Challenging the satisfaction claim. Governance, 30(2), 211–227. doi:10.1111/gove.12207.
  • Parks, R. B. (1984). Linking objective and subjective measures of performance. Public Administration Review, 44(2), 118–27. doi:10.2307/975862.
  • Perry, J. L., & Hondeghem, A. (2008). Motivation in public management: The call of public service. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Peters, J. G., & Welch, S. (1978). Political corruption in America: A search for definitions and theory, or if political corruption is in the mainstream of American politics, why is it not in the mainstream of American political research. American Political Science Review, 72(3), 974–984. doi:10.2307/1955115.
  • Porumbescu, G. A. (2017). Does transparency improve citizens’ perceptions of government performance? Evidence from Seoul, South Korea. Administration & Society, 49(3), 443–468. doi:10.1177/0095399715593314.
  • Redlawsk, D. P., & McCann, J. A. (2005). Popular interpretations of “corruption” and their partisan consequences. Political Behavior, 27(3), 261–283. doi:10.1007/s11109-005-4469-3.
  • Rosentraub, M. S., & Thompson, L. (1981). The use of surveys of satisfaction for evaluations. Policy Studies Journal, 9(7), 990–999. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01206.x.
  • Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Klinger, M. R., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (2007). Media priming: A meta-analysis. In R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen & J. Bryant (Eds.), Mass media effects research (pp. 53–80). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:10.4324/9780203823453-10.
  • Schneider, M. (1976). The “quality of life” and social indicators research. Public Administration Review, 36(3), 297–305. doi:10.2307/974587.
  • Swindell, D., & Kelly, J. (2005). Performance measurement versus city service satisfaction: Intra-city variations in quality? Social Science Quarterly, 86(3), 704–723. doi:10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00325.x.
  • Templeton, G. F. (2011). A two-step approach for transforming continuous variables to normal: Implications and recommendations for IS research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 28(1), 41–58. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol28/iss1/4
  • Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 354–369. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00594.x.
  • Van de Walle, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2007). Perceptions of productivity and performance in Europe and the United States. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(11), 1123–1140. doi:10.1080/01900690701225309.
  • Van Ryzin, G. G. (2004). Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3), 433–448. doi:10.1002/pam.20020.
  • Van Ryzin, G. G. (2008). Validity of an on-line panel approach to citizen surveys. Public Performance & Management Review, 32(2), 236–262. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576320203.
  • Van Ryzin, G. G. (2015). Service quality, administrative process, and citizens’ evaluation of local government in the US. Public Management Review, 17(3), 425–442. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.841456.
  • Van Ryzin, G. G., Immerwahr, S., & Altman, S. (2008). Measuring street cleanliness: A comparison of New York City’s scorecard and results from a citizen survey. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 295–303. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00863.x.
  • Weatherford, M. S. (1992). Measuring political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 86(1), 149–166. doi:10.2307/1964021.
  • Williams, M. N., Grajales, C. A., & Kurkiewicz, D. (2013). Assumptions of multiple regression: Correcting two misconceptions. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 18(11), 2–13. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=18&n=11
  • Yarwood, D. (1996). Stop bashing the bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 56(6), 611–613. doi:10.2307/977262.
  • Zheng, W., Li, L., Huang, Z., & Tan, X. (In press). Life satisfaction as a buffer of the relationship between corruption perception and political participation. Social Indicators Research, 132(2), 907–923. doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1318-1.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.