Can a science café and a concert communicate global change concepts?

References

• Aksit, O., McNeal, K. S., Libarkin, J. L., Gold, A. U., & Harris, S. (2017). The influence of instruction, prior knowledge, and values on climate change risk perception among undergraduates. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(4), 550–572. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allum, N., Sturgis, P., Tabourazi, D., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2008). Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 17(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1077/0963662506070159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisvert, D. L., & Slez, B. J. (1995). The relationship between exhibit characteristics and learning‐associated behaviors in a science museum discovery space. Science Education, 79(5), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candy, L. (2014). Evaluation and experience in art. In L. Candy & S. Ferguson (Eds.), Interactive experience in the digital age: Evaluating new art practice (pp. 25–48). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Candy, L., & Ferguson, S. (2014). Interactive experience, art and evaluation. In L. Candy & S. Ferguson (Eds.), Interactive experience in the digital age: Evaluating new art practice (pp. 1–10). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Di Lascio, E., Gashi, S., & Santini, S. (2018). Unobtrusive assessment of students' emotional engagement during lectures using electrodermal activity sensors. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2(3), 21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3264913
   Google Scholar
• Dillman Carpentier, F. R., & Potter, R. F. (2007). Effects of music on physiological arousal: Explorations into tempo and genre. Media Psychology, 10(3), 339–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701533045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M., Storm, H., Fremming, A., & Schollin, J. (2007). Skin conductance compared to a combined behavioural and physiological pain measure in newborn infants. Acta Paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 97(1), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00586.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, F. (2001). Communicating science through photography. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(10), 1312–1314. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed078p1312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatti, E., Calzolari, E., Maggioni, E., & Obrist, M. (2018). Emotional ratings and skin conductance response to visual, auditory and haptic stimuli. Scientific Data, 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.120
   Google Scholar
• Gilliam, M., Jagoda, P., Fabiyi, C., Lyman, P., Wilson, C., Hill, B., & Bouris, A. (2017). Alternate reality games as an informal learning tool for generating STEM engagement among underrepresented youth: A qualitative evaluation of the source. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9679-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalfa, S., Isabelle, P., Jean-Pierre, B., & Manon, R. (2002). Event-related skin conductance responses to musical emotions in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 328(2), 145–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00462-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, A., & Tegelberg, M. (2019). Witnessing glaciers melt: Climate change and transmedia storytelling. Journal of Science Communication, 18, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18020205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledowski, T., Bromilow, J., Wu, J., Paech, M. J., Storm, H., & Schug, S. A. (2007). The assessment of postoperative pain by monitoring skin conductance: Results of a prospective study. Anaesthesia, 62(10), 989–993. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05191.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesen, A. E., Rogan, A., & Blum, M. J. (2016). Science communication through art: Objectives, challenges, and outcomes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31(9), 657–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libarkin, J. L., Gold, A. E., Harris, S., McNeal, K. S., & Bowles, R. (2018). A new, valid measure of climate change understanding: Associations with risk perception. Climatic Change, 150(3-4), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2279-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, L.-O., Carlsson, F., Hilmersson, P., & Juslin, P. N. (2008). Emotional responses to music: Experience, expression, and physiology. Psychology of Music, 37(1), 61–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735607086048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeal, K. S., Walker, S. L., & Rutherford, D. (2014). Assessment of 6- to 20-Grade educators' climate knowledge and perceptions: Results from the Climate Stewardship Survey. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(4), 645–654. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-098.1
   Google Scholar
• McNeal, K. S., Zhong, M., Soltis, N., Doukopoulos, L., Johnson, E. T., Courtney, S., Alwan, A., & Porch, M. (2020). Biosensors show promise as a measure of student engagement in a large introductory biology course. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 19, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. (2010). Representing nature: Art and climate change. Cultural Geographies, 17(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474009349997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, A. L., Rozak, S., Gold, A. U., & Kay, J. E. (2020). Quantifying student engagement in learning about climate change using galvanic hand sensors in a controlled educational setting. Climatic Change, 159(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02576-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, S. C. (2010). Communicating climate change: History, challenges, process and future directions. WIREs Climate Change, 1(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.11
   Google Scholar
• Phelan, S., Specht, I., Schnotz, W., & Lewalter, D. (2017). Attitude change when presenting science museum visitors with risk–benefit information. Science Education, 101(6), 873–886. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijanowski, B. C., Farina, A., Gage, S. H., Dumyahn, S. L., & Krause, B. L. (2011). What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science. Landscape Ecology, 26(9), 1213–1232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9600-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, J. D. (2008). Early elementary students' development of astronomy concepts in the planetarium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priest, S. (2016). Communicating climate change: The path forward (p. 177). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58579-0
   Google Scholar
• Rickard, N. S. (2004). Intense emotional responses to music: A test of the physiological arousal hypothesis. Psychology of Music, 32(4), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735604046096
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. (2014). Communicating Science through the Performing Arts. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 39(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1179/0308018814Z.00000000089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimomura, Y., Yoda, T., Sugiura, K., Horiguchi, A., Iwanaga, K., & Katsuura, T. (2008). Use of frequency domain analysis of skin conductance for evaluation of mental workload. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 27(4), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa2.27.173
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simis, M. J., Madden, H., Cacciatore, M. A., & Yeo, S. K. (2016). The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England), 25(4), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516629749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltis, N. A., McNeal, K. S., Atkins, R. M., & Maudlin, L. C. (2020). A novel approach to measuring student engagement while using an augmented reality sandbox. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 44(4), 512-531. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2020.1771547
   Google Scholar
• St. George, S., Crawford, D., Reubold, T., & Giorgi, E. (2017). Making climate data sing: Using music-like sonifications to convey a key climate record. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 98(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00223.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolberg, T. L. (2006). Communicating science through the language of dance: A journey of education and reflection. Leonardo, 39(5), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2006.39.5.426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662504042690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, C. T., & Ferguson, S. (2014). The role of emotions in art evaluation. In L. Candy & S. Ferguson (Eds.), Interactive experience in the digital age: Evaluating new art practice (pp. 139–152). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tatalovic, M. (2009). Science comics as tools for science education and communication: A brief, exploratory study. Journal of Science Communication, 8, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.08040202
   Google Scholar
• Türk, C., & Kalkan, H. (2015). The effect of planetariums on teaching specific astronomy concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9516-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villanueva, I., Campbell, B. D., Raikes, A. C., Jones, S. H., & Putney, L. G. (2018). A multimodal exploration of engineering students' emotions and electrodermal activity in design activities. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(3), 414–441. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, J. (2018). Shifting baselines: Conveying climate change in popular music. Environmental Communication, 12(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1371051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, D., & Russell, K. (2010). Garden/Art: The nature-based sculpture program of the South Carolina Botanical Garden. Environmental Communication, 4(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524031003755341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar