References
- Allen, K., Higgins, S., & Adams, J. (2019). The relationship between visuospatial working memory and mathematical performance in school-aged children: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 31(3), 509–531. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09470-8
- Bandura, A. (2010). Self-efficacy. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th Ed. pp. 1534–1536). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons
- Bates, C., & Nettelbeck, T. (2001). Primary school teachers’ judgements of reading achievement. Educational Psychology, 21(2), 177–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410020043878
- Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers’ professional competence. In M. Kunter, M. Baumert, J. Blum, W. Klusmann, U. Krauss, & S. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers (pp. 25–48). Springer US. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5
- Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2006). Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9(4), 469–520. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-006-0165-2
- Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Creative openings in the social interactions of teaching. Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, 3(2), 261–273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2016-0017
- Berch, D. B. (2005). Making sense of number sense: Implications for children with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 333–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380040901
- Bryk, A. S. (2015). 2014 AERA Distinguished Lecture. Educational Researcher, 44(9), 467–477. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15621543
- Burns, J. C., Cooke, D. Y., & Schweider, C. (2011). A short guide to community based participatory action research: A community research lab guide. https://ktpathways.ca/resources/short-guide-community-based-participatory-action-research
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Conceptualizations of intrinsic motivation and self-determination. In Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Perspectives in Social Psychology. (pp. 11–40). Springer US. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7_2
- Dicke, A.-L., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., Nagy, G., & Nagy, N. (2012). Judging students’ achievement goal orientations: Are teacher ratings accurate? Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 844–849. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.004
- Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
- Freund, P. A., & Holling, H. (2008). Creativity in the classroom: A multilevel analysis investigating the impact of creativity and reasoning ability on GPA. Creativity Research Journal, 20(3), 309–318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802278776
- Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), 269–299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000133
- Geary, D. C. (2013). Early foundations for mathematics learning and their relations to learning disabilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412469398
- Hadzigeorgiou, Y., Fokialis, P., & Kabouropoulou, M. (2012). Thinking about creativity in science education. Creative Education, 3(5), 603–611. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.35089
- Hannula, M. M., & Lehtinen, E. (2005). Spontaneous focusing on numerosity and mathematical skills of young children. Learning and Instruction, 15(3), 237–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.005
- Hanses, P., & Rost, D. H. (1998). Das “Drama” der hochbegabten Underachiever. “Gewöhnliche” oder “außergewöhnliche” Underachiever? Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 12, 53–71.
- Hertzog, N. B. (1998). Open-ended activities: Differentiation through learner responses. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42(4), 212–227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629804200405
- Huang, C. (2011). Self-concept and academic achievement: A meta-analysis of longitudinal relations. Journal of School Psychology, 49(5), 505–528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.001
- Hunt, J. M. V. (1965). Intrinsic motivation and its role in psychological development. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 13, pp. 189–282). University of Nebraska Press.
- Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review : An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 9(2), 131–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_3
- Knopfelmacher, S., & Kronborg, L. (2003). Characteristics, competencies and classroom strategies of effective teachers of gifted and talented students. In L. Kronborg & S. Knopfelmacher (Eds.), Proceedings from the 9th National Conference of the Australian Association for the Education of Gifted and Talented Students, Sydney, 2002, CD Rom (pp.91–104). Melbourne: AAEGT
- Krajcik, J.S. & Blumenfeld, P. (2006). Project-based learning. In Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.), the Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.020
- Krampen, G. (2019). Psychologie der Kreativität: Divergentes Denken und Handeln in Forschung und Praxis (1. Auflage). Hogrefe.
- Kronborg, L., & Plunkett, M. (2013). Responding to professional learning: How effective teachers differentiate teaching and learning strategies to engage highly able adolescents. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 22(2), 52–63.
- Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
- Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(3), 517–528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054
- Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2007). Multiple solution tasks as a magnifying glass for observation of mathematical creativity. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 161–168). The Korea Society of Education Studies in Mathematics.
- Leikin, R., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2013). Creativity and mathematics education: The state of the art. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0459-1
- Li, J., Ye, H., Tang, Y., Zhou, Z., & Hu, X. (2018). What are the effects of self-regulation phases and strategies for Chinese students? A meta-analysis of two decades research of the association between self-regulation and academic performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02434
- Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 316–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00019.x
- Machts, N., Kaiser, J., Schmidt, F. T. C., & Möller, J. (2016). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ cognitive abilities: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 19, 85–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.06.003
- Mack, E., Breit, M., Krischler, M., Gnas, J., & Preckel, F. (2021). Talent development in natural science in elementary school: A juxtaposition of research and practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 104, 103366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103366
- Maker, C. J., & Schiever, S. W. (2010). Curriculum development and teaching strategies for gifted learners. Austin.
- Maresch, G. (2018). Development of spatial ability: Results from the research project geodiKon. In P. Herbst, U. H. Cheah, P. R. Richard, & K. Jones (Eds.), International perspectives on the teaching and learning of geometry in secondary schools (pp. 215–230). Springer.
- Mayer, D., Sodian, B., Koerber, S., & Schwippert, K. (2014). Scientific reasoning in elementary school children: Assessment and relations with cognitive abilities. Learning and Instruction, 29, 43–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.005
- McElvany, N., Schroeder, S., Baumert, J., Schnotz, W., Horz, H., & Ullrich, M. (2012). Cognitively demanding learning materials with texts and instructional pictures: Teachers’ diagnostic skills, pedagogical beliefs and motivation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(3), 403–420. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0078-1
- McMullen, J., Hannula-Sormunen, M. M., & Lehtinen, E. (2017). Spontaneous focusing on quantitative relations as a predictor of rational number and algebra knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 356–365. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.09.007
- Myers, T., Carey, E., & Szűcs, D. (2017). Cognitive and neural correlates of mathematical giftedness in adults and children: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1646. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01646
- Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., Halpern, D. F., Loehlin, J. C., Perloff, R., Sternberg, R. J., & Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.77
- Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392–430). Cambridge University Press
- Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Subotnik, R. F., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Aiming talent development toward creative eminence in the 21st Century. Roeper Review, 38(3), 140–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2016.1184497
- Pellegrino, J. W. (2014). Assessment as a positive influence on 21st century teaching and learning: A systems approach to progress. Psicología Educativa, 20(2), 65–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2014.11.002
- Pierce, R. L., & Adams, C. M. (2004). Tierdless lessons: One way to differentiate mathematics instruction. Gifted Child Today, 27(2), 58–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2004-133
- Poropat, A. E. (2014). A meta-analysis of adult-rated child personality and academic performance in primary education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12019
- Preckel, F., Golle, J., Grabner, R., Jarvin, L., Kozbelt, A., Müllensiefen, D., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Schneider, W., Subotnik, R., Vock, M., & Worrell, F. C. (2020). Talent development in achievement domains: A psychological framework for within- and cross-domain research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 691–722. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619895030
- Putwain, D. W., Symes, W., Nicholson, L. J., & Becker, S. (2018). Achievement goals, behavioural engagement, and mathematics achievement: A mediational analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 68, 12–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.09.006
- Rathé, S., Torbeyns, J., Hannula-Sormunen, M. M., De Smedt, B., & Verschaffe, L. (2016). Spontaneous focusing on numerosity: A review of recent research. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 1–25.
- Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184, 261
- Robson, D. A., Allen, M. S., & Howard, S. J. (2020). Self-regulation in childhood as a predictor of future outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 324–354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000227
- Roth, B., Becker, N., Romeyke, S., Schäfer, S., Domnick, F., & Spinath, F. M. (2015). Intelligence and school grades: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 53, 118–137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.002
- Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., & Cramond, B. (2010). Torrance tests of creative thinking as predictors of personal and public achievement: A fifty-year follow-up. Creativity Research Journal, 22(4), 361–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.523393
- Schrader, F.-W., & Helmke, A. (1987). Diagnostische Kompetenz von Lehrern: Komponenten und Wirkungen. Empirische Pädagogik, 1 (1), 27–52.
- Schacter, J., Thum, Y. M., & Zifkin, D. (2006). How Much does creative teaching enhance elementary school students’ achievement? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40(1), 47–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2006.tb01266.x
- Scherrer, V., Preckel, F., Schmidt, I., & Elliot, A. J. (2020). Development of achievement goals and their relation to academic interest and achievement in adolescence: A review of the literature and two longitudinal studies. Developmental Psychology, 56(4), 795–814. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000898
- Schneider, M., Beeres, K., Coban, L., Merz, S., Susan Schmidt, S., Stricker, J., & De Smedt, B. (2017). Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: A meta-analysis. Developmental Science, 20(3), e12372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12372
- Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2012). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence. In D. Flanagan & P. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed., pp. 99–144). Guilford.
- Schrader, J., Hasselhorn, M., Hetfleisch, P., & Goeze, A. (2020). Stichwortbeitrag Implementationsforschung: Wie Wissenschaft zu Verbesserungen im Bildungssystem beitragen kann. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 23(1), 9–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-020-00927-z
- Shulman, L. S., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Fostering communities of teachers as learners: Disciplinary perspectives. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 135–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000135049
- Siegle, D., & Powell, T. (2004). Exploring teacher biases when nominating students for gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800103
- Singer, V., & Strasser, K. (2017). The association between arithmetic and reading performance in school: A meta-analytic study. School Psychology Quarterly, 32(4), 435–448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000197
- Spinath, B. (2005). Akkuratheit der Einschätzung von Schülermerkmalen durch Lehrer und das Konstrukt der diagnostischen Kompetenz. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19(1/2), 85–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.19.12.85
- Sternberg, R. J. (1999). A propulsion model of types of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3(2), 83–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.3.2.83
- Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2018). The relationship between expertise and giftedness: A talent development perspective. In D. Z. Hambrick, G. Campitelli, & B. N. Macnamara (Eds.), (pp. 427–434) The science of expertise: Behavioral, neural, and genetic approaches to complex skill. Routledge.
- Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
- Südkamp, A., Kaiser, J., & Möller, J. (2012). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 743–762
- Sullivan, P. (2011). Teaching mathematics: Using research-informed strategies. Australian education review: no. 59. Camberwell, Vic.: Australian Council for Educational Research
- Sullivan, P., Warren, E., & White, P. (2000). Students’ responses to content specific open-ended mathematical tasks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217071
- Taylor, G., Jungert, T., Mageau, G. A., Schattke, K., Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S., & Koestner, R. (2014). A self-determination theory approach to predicting school achievement over time: The unique role of intrinsic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(4), 342–358. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.002
- The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005
- Thurstone, L. L. (1964). Theories of intelligence. The Scientific Monthly, 62(2), 101–112.
- Torrance, E. P. (1972). Career patterns and peak creative achievements of creative high school students twelve years later. Gifted Child Quarterly, 16(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001698627201600201
- van Ophuysen, S. (2010). Professionelle pädagogisch-diagnostische Kompetenz – Eine theoretische und empirische Annäherung [Professional pedagogical-diagnostic competence – A theoretical and empirical approach]. In W. Bos, H. G. Holtappels, H. Pfeiffer, H.-G. Rolff, & R. Schulz-Zander (Eds.), Jahrbuch der Schulentwicklung. Daten, Beispiele und Perspektiven (pp. 203–243). Juventa.
- Vincent-Lancrin, S., González-Sancho, C., Bouckaert, M., de Luca, F., Fernández-Barrerra, M., Jacotin, G., Urgel, J., & Vidal, Q. (2019). Fostering students’ creativity and critical thinking. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/62212c37-en
- von Stumm, S., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Ackerman, P. L. (2011). Re-visiting intelligence-personality associations: Vindicating intellectual investment. In T. Chamorro-Premuzic, S. von Stumm, & A. Furnham (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences (pp. 217–241). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343120
- Wang, S., Rubie-Davies, C. M., & Meissel, K. (2018). A systematic review of the teacher expectation literature over the past 30 years. Educational Research and Evaluation, 24(3–5), 124–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2018.1548798
- Weinert, F. E., Schrader, F.-W., & Helmke, A. (1990). Educational Expertise: Closing the gap between educational research and classroom practice. School Psychology International, 11(3), 163–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034390113002
- Westphal, A. (2016). Diagnostische Kompetenzen von Lehrkräften. Urteilstendenzen, Zusammenhänge mit dem Unterrichtshandeln und Entscheidungen zum Klassenüberspringen. Universität Potsdam.
- Yuan, K., Steedle, J., Shavelson, R., Alonzo, A., & Oppezzo, M. (2006). Working memory, fluid intelligence, and science learning. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 83–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2006.08.005
- Yurkofsky, M. M., Peterson, A. J., Mehta, J. D., Horwitz-Willis, R., & Frumin, K. M. (2020). Research on Continuous Improvement: Exploring the Complexities of Managing Educational Change. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 403–433. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20907363
- Ziegler, A. (2005). The actiotope model of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 411–436). Cambridge University Press.
- Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001