Tests of measurement invariance of three Wechsler intelligence tests in economically developing nations in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa

References

• Abubakar, A., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2017). How to adapt tests for sub-Saharan Africa. In A. Abubakar & F. J. R. van de Vijver (Eds.), Handbook of applied developmental science in sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 197–212). Springer New York.
   Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014) . Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. L., Te Nijenhuis, J., Woodley of Menie, M. A., Fernandes, H. B. F., Must, O., & Must, A. (2016). A NIT-picking analysis: Abstractness dependence of subtests correlated to their Flynn effect magnitudes. Intelligence, 57, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attallah, S. E. F., Ahmed, K. Y., & Meisenberg, G. (2014). Factor structure of Wechsler intelligence scale for children - Third Edition (WISC – III) among gifted students in the Sudan. Mankind Quarterly, 55(1), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.46469/mq.2014.55.1.11
   Google Scholar
• Bakhiet, S. F., Albursan, I. S., Al Qudah, M. F., Abduljabbar, A. S., Aljomaa, S. S., Toto, H. S. A., & Lynn, R. (2017). Sex differences on the WISC-III among children in Sudan and the United States. Journal of Biosocial Science, 49(6), 792–797. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021932016000432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaujean, A. A., McGlaughlin, S. M., & Margulies, A. S. (2009). Factorial validity of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales for referred students. Psychology in the Schools, 46(10), 932–950. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, J. W. (1984). Towards a universal psychology of cognitive competence. International Journal of Psychology, 19(1–4), 335–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207598408247536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carman, C. A., Walther, C. A. P., & Bartsch, R. A. (2020). Differences in using the cognitive abilities test (CogAT) 7 nonverbal battery versus the Naglieri nonverbal ability test (NNAT) 2 to identify the gifted/talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(3), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220921164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, C. V., Roorda, W., & Wicherts, J. M. (2004). Two failures of Spearman’s hypothesis: the GATB in Holland and the JAT in South Africa. Intelligence, 32(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2003.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, J. R. (2007). What is intelligence? Beyond the Flynn effect. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J. R., Te Nijenhuis, J., & Metzen, D. (2014). The g beyond Spearman’s g: Flynn’s paradoxes resolved using four exploratory meta-analyses. Intelligence, 44, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgas, J., Weiss, L. G., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Saklofske, D. H., Eds. (2003). Culture and children’s intelligence: cross-cultural analysis of the WISC-III. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012280055-9/50021-7
   Google Scholar
• Gichuhi, J. (1999). An examination of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III for predicting performance on a national examination of grade eight children in public primary schools [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Biola University,
   Google Scholar
• Gonthier, C. (2022). Cross-cultural differences in visuo-spatial processing and the culture-fairness of visuo-spatial intelligence tests: An integrative review and a model for matrices tasks. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7(1). Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00350-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holding, P., Anum, A., van de Vijver, F. J., Vokhiwa, M., Bugase, N., Hossen, T., Makasi, C., Baiden, F., Kimbute, O., Bangre, O., Hasan, R., Nanga, K., Sefenu, R. P. S., A-Hayat, N., Khan, N., Oduro, A., Rashid, R., Samad, R. … Faiz, A. (2018). Can we measure cognitive constructs consistently within and across cultures? Evidence from a test battery in Bangladesh, Ghana, and Tanzania. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2016.1206823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed.). https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. R. (1980). Précis of bias in mental testing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. R. (1985). The nature of the black–white difference on various psychometric tests: Spearman’s hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(2), 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00020392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: the science of mental ability. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G. (2016). Hive mind: how your nation’s IQ matters so much more than your own. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804797054
   Google Scholar
• Kathuria, R., & Serpell, R. (1998). Standardization of the Panga Munthu test–A nonverbal cognitive test developed in Zambia. The Journal of Negro Education, 67(3), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.2307/2668192
   Google Scholar
• Kuncel, N. R., & Hezlett, S. A. (2007). Standardized tests predict graduate students’ success. Science, 315(5815), 1080–1081. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2001). A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the graduate record examinations: Implications for graduate student selection and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke, G. H., Dolan, C. V., Kelderman, H., & Mellenbergh, G. J. (2003). On the relationship between sources of within- and between-group differences and measurement invariance in the common factor model. Intelligence, 31(6), 543–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(03)00051-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, R., & Becker, D. (2019). The intelligence of nations. Ulster Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miezah, D. (2015). Validation of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) in the Ghanaian population [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Ghana,
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O. (1989). Factor structure in groups selected on observed scores. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1989.tb01116.x
   Google Scholar
• Rasheed, M. A., Pham, S., Memon, U., Siyal, S., Obradović, J., & Yousafzai, A. K. (2018). Adaptation of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary scale of intelligence-III and lessons learned for evaluating intelligence in low-income settings. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 6(3), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2017.1302851
   Google Scholar
• Rindermann, H. (2018). Cognitive capitalism: Human capital and the wellbeing of nations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279339
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 86(1), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serpell, R. (1984). Research on cognitive development in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 7(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/016502548400700201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serpell, R., & Jere-Folotiya, J. (2008). Developmental assessment, cultural context, gender, and schooling in Zambia. International Journal of Psychology, 43(2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590701859184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J. (2005). Assessing goodness of fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37(4), 240–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2005.11909764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te Nijenhuis, J., Jongeneel-Grimen, B., & Armstrong, E. L. (2015). Are adoption gains on the g factor? A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 73, 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warne, R. T. (2020). In the know: Debunking 35 myths about human intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warne, R. T. (2023). National mean IQ estimates: Validity, data quality, and recommendations. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 9(2), 197–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-022-00351-y
   Google Scholar
• Warne, R. T., & Burningham, C. (2019). Spearman’s g found in 31 non-Western nations: Strong evidence that g is a universal phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 145(3), 237–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warne, R. T., Yoon, M., & Price, C. J. (2014). Exploring the various interpretations of “test bias“. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(4), 570–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler intelligence scale for children – Third Edition: Manual. The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2002). WPPSI-III technical manual. PsychCorp.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2008a). WAIS-IV administration and scoring manual. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2008b). WAIS-IV technical and interpretive manual. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wicherts, J. M., Dolan, C. V., Carlson, J. S., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2010). Raven’s test performance of sub-Saharan Africans: Average performance, psychometric properties, and the Flynn effect. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicherts, J. M., Dolan, C. V., Hessen, D. J., Oosterveld, P., van Baal, G. C. M., Boomsma, D. I., & Span, M. M. (2004). Are intelligence tests measurement invariant over time? Investigating the nature of the Flynn effect. Intelligence, 32(5), 509–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2004.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicherts, J. M., Dolan, C. V., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2010). A systematic literature review of the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans. Intelligence, 38(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2009.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. J., Bowden, S. C., Byrne, L. K., Joshua, N. R., Marx, W., & Weiss, L. G. (2023). The cross-cultural generalizability of cognitive ability measures: A systematic literature review. Intelligence, 98, Article 101751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2023.101751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. J., Bowden, S. C., Vannier, L.-C., Byrne, L. K., & Weiss, L. G. (2023). Measurement invariance of the Wechsler intelligence scale for children, Fifth Edition, in Australian and New Zealand and U.S. standardization samples. Psychological Assessment 35(6), 510–521. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar