Power Lines: Unobtrusive Assessment of E-mail Subject Line Impact on Organization Website Use

REFERENCES

• Abrajano, M., and C. Panagopolous. 2011. “Does Language Matter? The Impact of Spanish versus English-Language GOTV Efforts on Latino Turnout.” American Politics Research 39:643–63. doi:10.1177/1532673x10397000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arceneaux, K., and D. Nickerson. 2010. “Comparing Negative and Positive Campaign Messages: Evidence from Two Field Experiments.” American Politics Research 38:54–83. doi:10.1177/1532673x09331613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennion, E. A., and D. W. Nickerson. 2011. “The Cost of Convenience: An Experiment Showing E-mail Outreach Decreases Voter Registration.” Political Research Quarterly 64:858–69. doi:10.1177/1065912910382304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broockman, D. E., and D. P. Green. 2014. “Do Online Advertisements Increase Political Candidates’ Name Recognition or Favorability? Evidence from Randomized Field Experiments.” Political Behavior 36 (2):263–89. doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9239-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmines, E. G., and J. A. Stimson. 1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 74:78–91. doi:10.2307/1955648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. 2007. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., J. D. Smyth, and L. M. Christian. 2009. Internet, Mail, and Mixed-mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 3rd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, J., and D. P. Green. 2013. “Mobilizing Group Membership: The Impact of Personalization and Social Pressure E-mails.” Sage Open 3:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Dykema, J., J. Stevenson, L. Klein, Y. Kim, and B. Day. 2013. “Effects of Emailed Versus Mailed Invitations and Incentives on Response Rates, Data Quality, and Costs in a Web Survey of University Faculty.” Social Science Computer Review 31:359–70. doi:10.1177/0894439312465254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, P., I. Roberts, M. Clarke, C. DiGuiseppi, S. Pratap, R. Wentz, and I. Kwan. 2002. “Increasing Response Rates to Postal Questionnaires: Systematic Review.” British Medical Journal 324:1–9. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A., and D. P. Green. 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. S., J. G. Gimpel, D. P. Green, and D. R. Shaw. 2011. “How Large and Long-lasting are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 105:135–50. doi:10.1017/s000305541000047x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. P., B. R. Calfano, and P. A. Aronow. 2014. “Field Experimental Designs for the Study of Media Effects.” Political Communication 31:168–80. doi:10.1080/10584609.2013.828142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillygus, D. S., and T. G. Shields. 2008. The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgekiss, R. 2014. “The 15 Most Powerful Words in Subject Lines.” Accessed July 31, 2015. Observations and Answers. CampaignMonitor.com https://www.campaignmonitor.com/blog/post/4210/power-words-in-e-mail-subject-lines.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. 2011. “Laboratory Experiments in Political Science.” In Handbook of Experimental Political Science, edited by J. Druckman D. P. Green J. H. Kuklinski and A. Lupia 73–88. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jerit, J., J. Barabas, and S. Clifford. 2013. “Comparing Contemporaneous Laboratory and Field Experiments on Media Effects.” Public Opinion Quarterly 77:256–82. doi:10.1093/poq/nft005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, C. 1999. “Viral Marketing.” Boardwatch Magazine November 13:50–53.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, P., and G. Armstrong. 2001. Principles of Marketing. 9th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, M. 2003. “America's Online Pursuits: The Changing Picture of Who's Online and What They Do.” Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N., M. Michelson, and A. A. Valenzuela. 2012. “E-mails from Official Sources can Increase Turnout.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 7:321–32. doi:10.1561/100.00011073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manheim, J. B. 2011. Strategy in Information and influence Campaigns: How Policy Advocates, Social Movements, Insurgent Groups, Corporations, Governments, and Others Get What They Want. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marissa, P., and S. Rajneesh. 2004. “Impact of Gender Differences on the Evaluation of Promotional E-mails.” Journal of Advertising Research 44:360–68. doi:10.1017/s0021849904040383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messer, B. L., and D. A. Dillman. 2011. “Surveying the General Public over the Internet using Address-based Sampling and Mail Contact Procedures.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75:429–57. doi:10.1093/poq/nfr021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelson, M. R. 2003. “Getting Out the Latino Youth Vote: How Door-to-door Canvassing Influences Voter Turnout in Rural Central California.” Political Behavior 25:247–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, N. D., and M. R. Stafford. 1999. “An International Analysis of Emotional and Rational Appeals in Services vs Goods Advertising.” Journal of Consumer Marketing 16:310–21. doi:10.1108/07363769910250769
   Google Scholar
• Modzelewski, M. F. 2000. “Finding and Cure for Viral Marketing.” Direct Marketing News September. Available online at: http://www.dmnews.com/finding-a-cure-for-viral-marketing-ills/article/68355
   Google Scholar
• Morton, R. B., and K. C. Williams. 2010. Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, D. W. 2007. “Does E-mail Boost Turnout?” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2:369–79. doi:10.1561/100.00007032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldmixon, E. A. 2005. Uncompromising Positions: God, Sex, and the US House of Representatives. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, J. E., R. Lewis, L. Mobilio, D. Perry, and N. Raman. 2004. “Viral Marketing or Electronic Word-of-mouth Advertising: Examining Consumer Responses and Motivations to Pass along E-mail.” Journal of Advertising Research 44:333–48. doi:10.1017/s0021849904040371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S. R., and M. E. Whitcomb. 2005. “E-mail Subject Lines and their Effect on Web Survey Viewing and Response.” Social Science Computer Review 23:380–87. doi:10.1177/0894439305275912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, S., and K. M. Sheldon. 2002. “An Improved Way to Characterize Internet Users.” Journal of Advertising Research 42:85–94. doi:10.2501/jar-42-5-85-94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, A. 2010. “Dimensions of Campaigns in the Age of Digital Networks.” In Campaigns and Elections American Style: Transforming American Politics, 3rd ed., edited by J. A. Thurber and C. J. Nelson Boulder, 175–96. CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. M., and K. Kiniorski. 2003. “Participation in Online Surveys: Results from a Series of Experiments.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Opinion Research, Nashville, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Trouteaud, A. R. 2004. “How You Ask Counts: A Test of Internet-related Components of Response Rates to a Web-based Survey.” Social Science Computer Review 22:385–92. doi:10.1177/0894439304265650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavreck, L. 2007. “The Dangers of Self-reports of Political Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2:287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar