To Run or Not to Run? U.S. House Campaign Advertising

References

• Abbe, Owen, Jay Goodliffe, Paul Herrnson, and Kelly Patterson. 2003. “Agenda Setting in Congressional Elections: The Impact of Issues and Campaigns on Voting Behavior.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (4):419–430. doi:10.1177/106591290305600404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, Jeffrey, and Roderick Kiewiet. 1989. “Explaining Patterns of Candidate Competition in Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (4):997–1015. doi:10.2307/2111118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biersack, Bob. 2018. “8 Years Later: How Citizens United Changed Campaign Finance.” Open Secrets. https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2018/02/how-citizens-united-changed-campaign-finance/ (19 October 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Brader, Ted. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brambor, Thomas, William Roberts Clark, Matt Golder. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analysis.” Political Analysis 14:63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, James E., John R. Alford, and Keith Henry. 1984. “Television Markets and Congressional Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 9 (4):665–678. doi:10.2307/439638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, Jamie, and Jason Matthew Roberts. 2013. Ambition, Competition, and Electoral Reform: The Politics of Congressional Elections across Time. Ann Arbor, IL: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choma, Russ. 2015. “Get Ready for a Flood of Online Campaign Ads That Will Target and Track You” Mother Jones. August 18.
   Google Scholar
• Cover, Albert, and Bruce Brumberg. 1982. “Baby Books and Ballots: The Impact of Congressional Mail on Constituent Opinion.” American Political Science Review 76 (2):347–359. doi:10.1017/S0003055400187040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary, and Jonathan Katz. 1996. “Why Did the Incumbency Advantage Grow?” American Journal of Political Science 40 (2):478–497. doi:10.2307/2111633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elazar, Daniel. 1984. American Federalism: A View from the States. (3rd Edition). New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorina, Morris. 1977. Congress, Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, Michael, Paul Freedman, Ken Goldstein, and Travis Ridout. 2008. Campaign Advertising and American Democracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, Paul, and Ken Goldstein. 1999. “Measuring Media Exposure and the Effects of Negative Campaign Ads.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (4):1189–1208. doi:10.2307/2991823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garramone, Gina. 1984. “Voter Response to Negative Political Ads.” Journalism Quarterly 61 (2):250–259. doi:10.1177/107769908406100202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geer, John G. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Advertising in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Ken, and Paul Freedman. 2002. “Lessons Learned: Campaign Advertising in the 2000 Elections.” Political Communication 19 (1):5–28. doi:10.1080/105846002317246461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Kenneth, and Travis Ridout. 2004. “Measuring the Effects of Televised Political Advertising in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science 7 (1):205–226. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104820.
   Google Scholar
• Herrnson, Paul, and James Gimpel. 1995. “District Conditions and Primary Divisiveness in Congressional Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 48 (1):117–134. doi:10.1177/106591299504800107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrnson, Paul, and Kelly Patterson. 2000. “Agenda Setting and Campaign Advertising in Congressional Elections.” Crowded Airwaves: Campaign Advertising in Elections ??:96–112.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Gary. 2009. The Politics of Congressional Elections. 7th ed. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Gary C., and Samuel Kernell. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolodny, Robin. 1998. Pursuing Majorities: Congressional Campaign Committees in American Politics. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsitz, Keena. 2011. Competitive Elections and the American Voter. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. vol. 7 of Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. Scott, and Jeremy Freese. 2006. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using STATA. 2nd ed. College Station, TX: STATA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt, Sharyne. 1984. “Negative Political Advertising: Some Empirical Findings.” Journal of Advertising 13 (3):27–38. doi:10.1080/00913367.1984.10672899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyeatt, Nicholas. 2014. “Incumbent Ideology, District Ideology, and Candidate Entry in US Congressional Elections, 1954–2008.” The Social Science Journal 51 (2):181–190. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2014.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulous, Costas. 2005. “Vested Interests: Interest Group Resource Allocation in Presidential Campaigns.” Journal of Political Marketing 5:59–77.
   Google Scholar
• Rae, Douglas. 1967. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rozell, Mark J., Clyde Wilcox, and David Madland. 2006. Interest Groups in American Campaigns: The New Face of Electioneering. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffner, Brian. 2006. “The Political Geography of Campaign Advertising in US House Elections.” Political Geography 25 (7):775–788. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratmann, Thomas. 2009. “How Prices Matter in Politics: The Returns to Campaign Advertising.” Public Choice 140 (3–4):357–377. doi:10.1007/s11127-009-9425-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurber, James, Candice Nelson, and David Dulio. 2000. Crowded Airwaves: Campaign Advertising in Elections. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Christopher, Johanna Dunaway, and Tyler Johnson. 2012. “It’s All in the Name: Source Cue Ambiguity and the Persuasive Appeal of Campaign Ads.” Political Behavior 34 (3):561–584. doi:10.1007/s11109-011-9172-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, Darrell. 2010. Air Wars: Television Advertising in Election Campaigns, 1952-2008. 5th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, Darrell, Montague Kern, Dean Alger, and Janice Goggin. 1995. “Ad Buys in Presidential Campaigns: The Strategies of Electoral Appeal.” Political Communication 12 (3):275–290. doi:10.1080/10584609.1995.9963074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorn, Christopher. 1998. “An Analytic and Empirical Examination of Zero-Inflated and Hurdle Poisson Specifications.” Sociological Methods & Research 26:368–400. doi:10.1177/0049124198026003004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar