The Un-Connectivity of Connective Parties: Analyzing the Online Interaction Patterns of Unidos Podemos in Spain

References

• Baviera, T., D. Calvo, and G. Llorca-Abad. 2019. “Mediatisation in Twitter: An Exploratory Analysis of the 2015 Spanish General Election.” The Journal of International Communication 25 (2):275–300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2019.1634619.
   Google Scholar
• Belli, S., and J. C. Aceros. 2019. “La Confianza Distribuida en Las Redes: un Estudio de Caso en el Ámbito de Los Movimientos Sociales.” Redes. Revista Hispana Para el Análisis de Redes Sociales 31 (1):46–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.858.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., and A. Segerberg. 2012. “The Logic of Connective Action.” Information, Communication & Society 15 (5):739–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., A. Segerberg, and C. B. Knüpfer. 2018. “The Democratic Interface: Technology, Political Organization, and Diverging Patterns of Electoral Representation.” Information, Communication & Society 21 (11):1655–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1348533.
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, B., and R. Davis. 2003. Campaigning Online: The Internet in US Elections. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo, K. 2019. “The Long Shadow of Activism. Podemos and the Difficult Choices of Movement-Parties.” In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary European Social Movements: Protest in Turbulent Times. London: Routledge, edited by Cristina Fominaya and Ramón Feenstra, 372–86.
   Google Scholar
• Casas, A., F. Davesa, and M. Congosto. 2016. Media Coverage of a "Connective" Action: The Interaction between the 15-M Movement and the Mass Media, vol. 155, 73–95. Reis: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas. doi: https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.155.73.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2012. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, W. T., and L. Obholzer. 2020. “Reaching out to the Voter? Campaigning on Twitter during the 2019 European Elections.” Research & Politics 7 (2):205316802091725. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020917256.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, R. 1999. The Web of Politics: The Internet’s Impact on the American Political System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deseriis, M. 2020. “Two Variants of the Digital Party: The Platform Party and the Networked Party.” PACO. Partecipazione e Conflitto 13 (1):896–917.
   Google Scholar
• Doroshenko, L., T. Schneider, D. Kofanov, M. A. Xenos, D. A. Scheufele, and D. Brossard. 2019. “Ukrainian Nationalist Parties and Connective Action: An Analysis of Electoral Campaigning and Social Media Sentiments.” Information, Communication & Society 22 (10):1376–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1426777.
   Google Scholar
• Eldridge, S. A., II, L. García-Carretero, and M. Broersma. 2019. “Disintermediation in Social Networks: Conceptualizing Political Actors’ Construction of Publics on Twitter.” Media and Communication 7 (1):271–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1825.
   Google Scholar
• García-Carretero, L., and J. Díaz-Noci. 2018. “From Social Movements to Political Parties. barcelona en Comú’s Electoral Message, Uses and Limitations on Twitter during 2015 City Council Election.” OBETS. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 13 (2):515–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.14198/OBETS2018.13.2.03.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. 2021. “Are Digital Parties More Democratic than Traditional Parties? Evaluating Podemos and Movimento 5 Stelle’s Online Decision-Making Platforms.” Party Politics 27 (4):730–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819884878.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. K., W. Lusoli, and S. Ward. 2005. “Online Participation in the UK: Testing a ‘Contextualised’ Model of Internet Effects.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 7 (4):561–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2005.00209.x.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. K., and S. Ward. 2002. “Virtual Campaigning: Australian Parties and the Impact of the Internet.” Australian Journal of Political Science 37 (1):99–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603100220119047.
   Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, Homero, Aaron Veenstra, Emily Vraga, and Dhavan Shah. 2010. “Digital Democracy: Reimagining Pathways to Political Participation.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 7 (1):36–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331680903316742.
   Google Scholar
• Greer, J. D. and M. E. LaPointe. 2004. “Cyber-Campaigning Grows up: A Comparative Content Analysis of Websites for US Senate and Gubernatorial Races, 1998–2000.” In Electronic Democracy. London: Routledge. edited by R. Gibson, A. Römmele and S. Ward, 132–48.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero-Solé, F. 2018. “Interactive Behavior in Political Discussions on Twitter: Politicians, Media, and Citizens’ Patterns of Interaction in the 2015 and 2016 Electoral Campaigns in Spain.” Social Media + Society 4 (4):205630511880877. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118808776.
   Google Scholar
• Hague, B. N. and B. D. Loader. 1999. Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. J. 2017. “Social Media and Political Campaigning: Changing Terms of Engagement?” The International Journal of Press/Politics 22 (1):23–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216673196.
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A. 2016. “Twitter Use in Election Campaigns: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13 (1):72–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C., and S. Lee. 2020. “Innovation vs. Normalization: Politicians’ Twitter Use at the Early Majority Stage of Its Diffusion in the Korean Assembly.” The Social Science Journal 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1782634.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, Ulrike, and Jakob Svensson. 2015. “The Emergence of Network Media Logic in Political Communication: A Theoretical Approach.” New Media & Society 17 (8):1241–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814522952.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O. 2013. “Rejected Bits of Program Code”: Why Notions of “Politics 2.0” Remain (Mostly) Unfulfilled.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 10 (1):72–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2012.719727.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O., and H. Moe. 2012. “Studying Political Microblogging: Twitter Users in the 2010 Swedish Election Campaign.” New Media & Society 14 (5):729–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811422894.
   Google Scholar
• Lilleker, D. G., and K. Koc-Michalska. 2013. “Online Political Communication Strategies: MEPs, E-Representation, and Self-Representation.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 10 (2):190–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2012.758071.
   Google Scholar
• Loader, B. D., and D. Mercea. 2011. “Networking Democracy?” Information, Communication & Society 14:757–69.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, M., and D. Resnick. 2000. Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace "Revolution.” Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. 2015. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos-Serrano, M., J. D. Fernández Gómez, and A. Pineda. 2018. “Follow the Closing of the Campaign on Streaming’: The Use of Twitter by Spanish Political Parties during the 2014 European Elections.” New Media & Society 20 (1):122–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816660730.
   Google Scholar
• Raniolo, F., and V. Tarditi. 2019. “Digital Revolution and Party Innovations: An Analysis of the Spanish Case.” Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica 50 (2):235–253.
   Google Scholar
• Rauchfleisch, A., and J. Metag. 2020. “Beyond Normalization and Equalization on Twitter: Politicians’ Twitter Use during Non-Election Times and Influences of Media Attention.” Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies 9 (2):169–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00021_1.
   Google Scholar
• Rico Motos, C. 2019. “Let the Citizens Fix This Mess!’ Podemos’ Claim for Participatory Democracy in Spain.” Politics and Governance 7 (2):187–210. doi: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i2.1893.
   Google Scholar
• Sampedro, V., and L. Mosca. 2018. “Digital Media, Contentious Politics and Party Systems in Italy and Spain.” Javnost—The Public 25 (1–2):160–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1423959.
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, E. J. 2005. “Election Campaigning Online German Party Websites in the 2002 National Elections.” European Journal of Communication 20 (3):327–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105055261.
   Google Scholar
• Southern, R., and B. J. Lee. 2019. “Politics as Usual? Assessing the Extent and Content of Candidate-Level Online Campaigning at the 2015 UK General Election.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 29 (2):179–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2018.1515209.
   Google Scholar
• Spierings, N., K. Jacobs, and N. Linders. 2019. “Keeping an Eye on the People: Who Has Access to MPs on Twitter?” Social Science Computer Review 37 (2):160–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318763580.
   Google Scholar
• Stier, S., W. J. Schünemann, and S. Steiger. 2018. “Of Activists and Gatekeepers: Temporal and Structural Properties of Policy Networks on Twitter.” New Media & Society 20 (5):1910–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817709282.
   Google Scholar
• Tromble, R. 2018. “Thanks for (Actually) Responding! How Citizen Demand Shapes Politicians’ Interactive Practices on Twitter.” New Media & Society 20 (2):676–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816669158.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J. 2000. “Models of Democracy and Concepts of Communication.” In Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory & Practice, K. L. Hacker and J. van Dijk, 30–53. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vittori, D. 2020. “The Impact of Populism on Party Organization? A Study of Four Southern European ‘Populist’ Parties.” European Politics and Society 21 (1):53–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1602925.
   Google Scholar