Archetypes of Polish Political Parties - Empirical Analysis

References

• Aaker, D. A. 1991. Managing Brand Equity. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aaker, J. 1997. “Dimensions of Brand Personality.” Journal of Marketing Research 34 (3): 347–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379703400304.
   Google Scholar
• Aaker, J.L., S. Fournier, and S.A. Brasel. 2004. “When Good Brands Do Bad.” Journal of Consumer Research 31 (1):1–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/383419.
   Google Scholar
• Achen, Ch, and L. Bartels. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. 1983. The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bechter, C., G. Farinelli, R. Daniel, and M. Frey. 2016. “Advertising Between Archetype and Brand Personality.” Administrative Sciences 6 (2):5. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci6020005.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller, and D. E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller, and D. E. Stokes. 1967. Elections and the Political Order. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ciąćka, P., and B. Rąbińska. 2021. “„Badania Jakościowe – Klasyczne Metody FGI Oraz IDI.” in: M. J. Lutostański, A. Łebkowska, M. Protasiuk, Badanie Rynku. Jak Zrozumieć Konsumenta? Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
   Google Scholar
• Cwalina, W., and M. Drzewiecka. 2022. “How Trust Wins against Criticism: Promise Concept as a Political Branding Tool. Lessons from Polish Politics.” In: Political Branding in Turbulent Times, edited by M. Moufahim, 123–40. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cwalina, W., and A. Falkowski. 2006. Marketing Polityczny. Perspektywa Psychologiczna. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
   Google Scholar
• Cwalina, Wojciech, and Andrzej Falkowski. 2015. “Political Branding: Political Candidates Positioning Based on Interobject Associative Affinity Index.” Journal of Political Marketing 14 (1-2):152–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.990842.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, G., and T. Mian. 2010. “The Reputation of the Party Leader and of the Party Being Led.” European Journal of Marketing 44 (3/4):331–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011020453.
   Google Scholar
• Deegan-Krause, K. 2007. New dimensions of political cleavages. In: R. Dalton, H. D. Klingemann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Chernatony, L. 2007. From Brand Vision to Brand Evaluation. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M., and S. Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demertzis, N. 2013. Introduction: Theorizing the Emotions-Politics Nexus. In: Demertzis N. (eds) Emotions in Politics. Palgrave Studies in Political Psychology series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137025661_1.
   Google Scholar
• Dirk, F., and P. Riedl. 2004.“Theoretical Foundations of Contemporary Qualitative Market Research [63 paragraphs].” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 5(2)): Art. 30, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0402307.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Falkowki, A., and W. Cwalina. 2015. “Political Branding: Political Candidates Positioning Based on Inter-Object Associative Affinity Index.” Journal of Political Marketing 14(1): 152–74.
   Google Scholar
• Farhan, A., and A. Ahmad. 2015. “A Review of Political Branding Research.” Global Journal of Business and Social Science Review 4:340–8.
   Google Scholar
• Farrag, D. A. R., and H. Shamma. 2014. “Factors Influencing Voting Intentions for Egyptian Parliament Elections.” 2011. “Journal of Islamic Marketing 5 (1): 49–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2013-0003.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorina, M. P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. 1993. “Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning.” Journal of Consumer Research 20 (2): 303–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/209351.
   Google Scholar
• French, A., and I. G. Smith. 2008. “Measuring Political Brand Equity: A Consumer Approach.” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Political Marketing, Manchester Business School, March.
   Google Scholar
• Guzmán, F., and V. Sierra. 2009. “A Political Candidate’s Brand Image Scale: Are Political Candidates Brands?” Journal of Brand Management 17 (3): 207–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2009.19.
   Google Scholar
• Haire, M. 1950. “Projective Techniques in Marketing Research.” Journal of Marketing 14 (5): 649–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224295001400501.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwell, M., and J. Chen. 2012. Archetypes in Branding: A Toolkit for Creatives and Strategists. New York: HOW Books; Spi edition
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, A., J. van Hoof, N. Walenberg, and M. de Jong. 2007. “Projective Techniques for Brand Image Research: Two Personification‐Based Methods Explored.” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 10 (3): 300–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750710754326.
   Google Scholar
• Holewa, A., O. Gorbaniuk, 2009. Taksonomia wolnych skojarzeń z partiami politycznymi w czasie wyborów parlamentarnych w 2007 roku: badania studentów lubelskich uczelni. In A. Oleszkowicz, P. Dybek, (ed.), Psychologia ilości, psychologia jakości. Uzupełniające się skojarzenia, Wrocław: Atut, ss. 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, S. 2007. “Partisanship Reconsidered.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by R. Dalton, H.-D. Klingemann, 557–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasiewicz-Betkiewicz, A., M. Cześnik, M. Kotnarowski, M. Wenzel, and M. Żerkowska-Balas. 2017. Co tam Panie w polityce? Struktura potocznej wiedzy politycznej Polaków. Kultura I Społeczeństwo 61 (4):27–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2017.61.4.2.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C. G., 1954. “Psychological Aspects of the Mother Archetype.” In The Collected Works of C, G. Jung, edited by H. Read, M. Fordham, and G. Adler, Vol. 9, 75–110. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kapferer, J. N. 2004. The New Strategic Brand Management: Creating and Sustaining Brand Equity Long Term. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Karczmarczuk, A., and A. Forycka-Zawadka. 2021. “Badania Służące Segmentacji Rynku, Czyli Jak Wyróżnić i Opisać Swoją Grupę Docelową.” In: Badanie Rynku. Jak Zrozumieć Konsumenta?, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, edited by M. J. Lutostański, A. Łebkowska, and M. Protasiuk, Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, P., and K. L. Keller. 2012. Marketing Management. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., C. Mothes, and N. Polavin. 2020. “Confirmation Bias, Ingroup Bias, and Negativity Bias in Selective Exposure to Political Information.” Communication Research, 47(1): 104–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217719596.
   Google Scholar
• Knutsen, O. 2007. The decline of social class?. In: R. Dalton, H.D. Klingemann, (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyszycha, G., and O. Gorbaniuk. 2011. “Zbieżność percepcji siebie i “osobowości” partii politycznej a preferencje polityczne wśród studentów, [w:] I. Hofman (red.), Marketing polityczny.” Teoria i praktyka, Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.
   Google Scholar
• Kuklinski, J., P. Quirk, J. Jerit, D. Schwieder, and R. Rich. 2000. “Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship.” The Journal of Politics 62 (3):790–816. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00033.
   Google Scholar
• Le Duc, L. 1981. “The Dynamic Properties of Party Identification: A Four-Nation Comparison.” European Journal of Political Research 9 (3):257–68.
   Google Scholar
• Markowski, R. 2013. “„Identyfikacja Partyjna w Nowych Demokracjach: przypadek Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej.” Studia Polityczne 32:45–73.
   Google Scholar
• Munteanu, A., I. Costea, R. Palos, and A. Jinaru. 2010. “Entering in the Essences of Personality – Studies over Archetypes.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 5:2272–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.448.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, C. 2005. “Brand Leaders: Clinton, Blair and the Limitations of the Permanent Campaign.” Political Studies 53 (2): 343–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00532.x.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, C. 2006. “Brands and Political Loyalty.” Journal of Brand Management 13 (3):178–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540260.
   Google Scholar
• Neeley, S.M., and M. Cronley. 2004. “When Research Participants Don’t Tell It like It is: Pinpointing the Effects of Social Desirability Bias Using Self Vs. Indirect-Questioning.” NA - Advances in Consumer Research 31:432–3.
   Google Scholar
• Newman Bruce, I. 1999. The Mass Marketing of Politics: Democracy in an Age of Manufactured Images. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, S. W. 2017. “On Political Brands: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Journal of Political Marketing 16 (2):118–146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.959694.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, S. W., and M. V. Larsen. 2014. “Party Brands and Voting.” Electoral Studies 33:153–65.
   Google Scholar
• O’Shaughnessy, Nicholas J., and Stephan C. Henneberg. 2007. “The Selling of the President 2004: A Marketing Perspective.” Journal of Public Affairs 7(3): 249–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.265.
   Google Scholar
• Oklevik, O., M. Supphellen, and N. Maehle. 2020. “Time to Retire the Concept of Brand Personality? Extending the Critique and Introducing a New Framework.” Journal of Consumer Behaviour 19 (3):211–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1805.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, A., Y. Khogeer, and J. Hodgson. 2013. “How to Create an Influential Anthropomorphic Mascot: Literary Musings on Marketing.” Make-Believe and Meerkats 29 (1/2): 69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Phil, H. and L. Andrew. 2001. “Establishing the Charles Kennedy Brand: A Strategy for an Election the Result of which is a Foregone Conclusion.” Journal of Marketing Management 17 (9-10):943–956. doi: https://doi.org/10.1362/026725701323366683.
   Google Scholar
• Pich, C., and G. Armannsdottir. 2018. “Political Brand Image: An Investigation into the Operationalisation of the External Orientation of David Cameron’s Conservative Brand.” Journal of Marketing Communications 24 (1):35–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2015.1072577.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, J.T. 1984. “How Personality Makes a Difference.” Journal of Advertising Research 24:27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M. 2018. Hooked: How Politics Captures People’s Interest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudi, T. 2006. “What Kind of Party Identification Does Exist in Emerging Democracies in Central and Eastern Europe?.” Paper Presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops. 2006. Nicosia: Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Rutter, R.,. C. Hanretty, and F. Lettice. 2018. “Political Brands: can Parties Be Distinguished by Their Online Brand Personality?” Journal of Political Marketing 17 (3):193–212. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2015.1022631.
   Google Scholar
• Scammell, M. 2007. “Political Brands and Consumer Citizens: The Rebranding of Tony Blair.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 611 (1):176–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716206299149.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, H. 2004. “Branding in Politics – Manifestations, Relevance and Identity-Oriented Management.” Journal of Political Marketing 3 (3):41–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1300/J199v03n03_03.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, P., and P. Reeves. 2015. “Does the Factor Theory of Satisfaction Explain Political Voting Behaviour ?” European Journal of Marketing 49 (5/6): 968–6. (doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-08-2014-0524.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. 1990. “A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism” Science 250: 1665–1668.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. 1991. “Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning” Organization Science 2 (1): 125–134.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. 2001. “The 2001 General Election: Factors Influencing the Brand Image of Political Parties and Their Leaders.” Journal of Marketing Management 17 (9-10):989–73. /10):doi: https://doi.org/10.1362/026725701323366719.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. 2005. “Politically Significant Events and Their Effect on the Image of Political Parties: A Conceptual Approach.” Journal of Political Marketing 4 (2/3):91–114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1300/J199v04n02_05.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. 2009. “Conceptualizing and Testing Brand Personality in British Politics.” Journal of Political Marketing 8 (3):209–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15377850903044858.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G., and A. French. 2009. “The Political Brand: A Consumer Perspective.” Marketing Theory 9 (2): 209–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593109103068.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G., and A. French. 2011. “Measuring the Changes to Leader Brand Associations during the 2010 Election Campaign.” Journal of Marketing Management 27 (7-8): 718–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2011.587825.
   Google Scholar
• Spry, L., and C. Pich. 2021. “Enhancing data collection methods with qualitative projective techniques in the exploration of a university’s brand identity and brand image.” International Journal of Market Research 63 (2):177–200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320943045.
   Google Scholar
• Staiger, J., A. Cvetkovich and A. Reynolds. (Eds.). 2010. “Political Emotions (1st ed.).” Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203849538.
   Google Scholar
• Staniszewski, M. 2018. Archetypy w Marketingu. ICAN Institute. Available online: https://www.ican.pl/b/archetypy-w-marketingu/P186t4PAC
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, A. 2006. “The Archetypes.” In: The Handbook of Jungian Psychology, edited by. R. Papadopoulos, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Street, J. 2003. “The Celebrity Politician: Political Style and Popular Culture.” In Media and the Restyling of Politics, edited by J. Corner and D. Pels, 85–99. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., and C. Teddlie. (Eds.). 2003. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., and A. Tashakkori. 2009. Foundations of Mixed Methods Research. Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, J. ( 2005. ed.). “The European Voter.” A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, J. 2001. “Economic Conditions and the Vote for Incumbent Parties in Russia.” Post-Soviet Affairs, 17 (4): 309–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2001.10641506.
   Google Scholar
• Turska-Kawa, A. 2013. “„Marka Idealnej Partii Politycznej w Opinii Wyborców o Różnych Preferencjach Ideologicznych i Partyjnych.” Political Preferences 5:29–47.
   Google Scholar
• Tworzecki, H. 2003. “Learning to Choose.” Electoral Politics in East-Central Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vlachová, K. 2001. “Party Identification in the Czech Republic: Inter-Party Hostility and Party Preference.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 34 (4): 479–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-067X(01)00015-0.
   Google Scholar
• Voeth, M., and U. Herbst. 2008. “The Concept of Brand Personality as an Instrument for Advanced Non-Profit Branding–an Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 19 (1):71–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1300/J054v19n01_04.
   Google Scholar
• Vössing, K. 2021. “The Quality of Political Information.” Political Studies Review 19(4): 574–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920917618.
   Google Scholar
• White, J., and L. de Chernatony. 2002. “New Labour: A Study of the Creation, Development and Demise of a Political Brand.” Journal of Political Marketing 1(2/3): 45–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1300/J199v01n02_04.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zober, M. 1956. “Some Projective Techniques Applied to Marketing Research.” Journal of Marketing 20 (3): 262–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224295602000306.
   Google Scholar