Data Driven-Campaign Infrastructures in Europe: Evidence from Austria and the UK

References

• Ali, M., Sapiezynski, P. Korolova, A. Mislove, A., and Rieke A. 2019. “Ad Delivery Algorithms: The Hidden Arbiters of Political Messaging.” CoRR. http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.04255.
   Google Scholar
• Anstead, N. 2017. “Data-Driven Campaigning in the 2015 United Kingdom General Election.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 22 (3): 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217706163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baines, P. 2005. “Marketing the Political Message: American Influences on British Practices.” Journal of Political Marketing 4 (2–3): 135–162. https://doi.org/10.1300/J199v04n02_07.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin-Philippi, J. 2019. “Data Campaigning: Between Empirics and Assumptions.” Internet Policy Review 8 (4): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin-Philippi, J. 2020. “Data Ops, Objectivity, and Outsiders: Journalistic Coverage of Data Campaigning.” Political Communication 37 (4): 468–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1723751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J., J. Smith, and R. Acton. 2018. The Future of Political Campaigning. Demos. https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/reports/2259365/the-future-of-political-campaigning.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. 2015. “Trends in Voter Surveillance in Western Societies: Privacy Intrusions and Democratic Implications.” Surveillance & Society 13 (3/4): 370–384. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v13i3/4.5373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. 2016. “Voter Databases, Micro-Targeting, and Data Protection Law: can Political Parties Campaign in Europe as They Do in North America?” International Data Privacy Law 6 (4): 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipw021.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, C., and R. Bayley. 2018. The Influence Industry: Data Analytics in Canadian Election. Tactical Tech. https://cdn.ttc.io/s/ourdataourselves.tacticaltech.org/ttc-influence-industry-canada.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S. 2014. “Unstructured and Semi-Structured Interviewing.” In The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Leavy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 277–299.
   Google Scholar
• Chester, J., and K. C. Montgomery. 2019. “The Digital Commercialisation of US Politics—2020 and Beyond.” Internet Policy Review 8 (4): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotter, K., M. Medeiros, C. Pak, and K. Thorson. 2021. “Reach the Right People”: The Politics of “Interests” in Facebook’s Classification System for Ad Targeting.” Big Data & Society 8 (1): 205395172199604. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951721996046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobber, T., D. Trilling, N. Helberger, and C. de Vreese. 2017. “Two Crates of Beer and 40 Pizzas: The Adoption of Innovative Political Behavioral Targeting Techniques.” Internet Policy Review 6 (4): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.4.777.
   Google Scholar
• Dommett, K., A. Barclay, and R. Gibson. 2024. Just what is datadriven campaigning? A systematic review. Information, Communication & Society 27 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2166794.
   Google Scholar
• Dommett, K., G. Kefford, and S. Kruschinski. 2024. Data-Driven Campaigning in Political Parties: Five Advanced Democracies Compared. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giasson, T., G. Le Bars, and P. Dubois. 2019. “Is Social Media Transforming Canadian Electioneering? Hybridity and Online Partisan Strategies in the 2012 Quebec Election.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 52 (2): 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423918000902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorton, W. A. 2016. “Manipulating Citizens: How Political Campaigns’ Use of Behavioral Social Science Harms Democracy.” New Political Science 38 (1): 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2015.1125119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh, E. 2015. Hacking the Electorate: How Campaigns Perceive Voters. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Hersh, E., and B. Schaffner. 2013. “Targeted Campaign Appeals and the Value of Ambiguity.” The Journal of Politics 75 (2): 520–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, P. N., and D. Kreiss. 2010. “Political Parties and Voter Privacy: Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and United States in Comparative Perspective.” First Monday 15 (12). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i12.2975.
   Google Scholar
• ICO. 2018. Investigation into the Use of Data Analytics in Political Campaigns. https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/2260271/investigation-into-the-use-of-data-analytics-in-political-campaigns-final-20181105.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ICO. 2023. “Protecting Personal Data.” Accessed January 5, 2023. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/key-dp-themes/guidance-for-the-use-of-personal-data-in-political-campaigning-1/collecting-personal-data/#canweuse.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H. 2013. “Messages, Micro-Targeting, and New Media Technologies.” The Forum 11 (3): 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2013-0052.
   Google Scholar
• Kefford, G. 2021. Political Parties and Campaigning in Australia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kefford, G., K. Dommett, J. Baldwin-Philippi, S. Bannerman, T. Dobber, S. Kruschinski, S. Kruikemeier, and E. Rzepecki. 2022. “Data-Driven Campaigning and Democratic Disruption: Evidence from Six Advanced Democracies.” Party Politics 6 (4): 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221084039.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr Morrison, J., R. Naik, and S. Hankey. 2018. Data and Democracy in the Digital Age. London: The Constitution Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. 2017. “Micro-Targeting, the Quantified Persuasion.” Internet Policy Review 6 (4): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.4.774.
   Google Scholar
• Kruschinski, S., and A. Haller. 2017. “Restrictions on Data-Driven Political Micro-Targeting in Germany.” Internet Policy Review 6 (4): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.4.780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusche, I. 2020. “The Old in the New: Voter Surveillance in Political Clientelism and Datafied Campaigning.” Big Data & Society 7 (1): 205395172090829. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720908290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauderdale, B. E., D. Bailey, J. Blumenau, and D. Rivers. 2020. “Model-Based Pre-election Polling for National and Sub-National Outcomes in the US and UK.” International Journal of Forecasting 36 (2): 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees-Marshment, J. 2001. Political Marketing and British Political Parties: The Party’s Just Begun. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lester, J. N., Y. Cho, and C. R. Lochmiller. 2020. “Learning to Do Qualitative Data Analysis: A Starting Point.” Human Resource Development Review 19 (1): 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320903890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, L. 2015. “Validity, Reliability, and Generalizability in Qualitative Research.” Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 4 (3): 324–327. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.161306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Magin, M., N. Podschuweit, J. Haßler, and U. Russmann. 2017. “Campaigning in the Fourth Age of Political Communication. A Multi-Method Study on the Use of Facebook by German and Austrian Parties in the 2013 National Election Campaigns.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (11): 1698–1719. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1254269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margetts, H. 2006. “Cyber Parties.” In Handbook of Party Politics, edited by R. Katz and W. Crotty. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Margetts, H. 2017. “The Data Science of Politics.” Political Studies Review 15 (2): 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929917693643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvey, F., and J. Piebiak. 2019. “Does the Difference Compute? Data-Driven Campaigning in Canada.” In What’s #Trending in Canadian Politics? Understanding Transformations in Power, Media, and the Public Sphere, edited by M. Lalancette, R. Raynauld, and E. Crandall. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munroe, K., and H. Munroe. 2018. “Constituency Campaigning in the Age of Data.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423917001135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadler, A., M. Crain, and J. Donovan. 2018. Weaponizing the Digital Influence Machine. Data and Society Research Institute. https://datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/DS_Digital_Influence_Machine.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, D. W., and T. Rogers. 2014. “Political Campaigns and Big Data.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (2): 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.2.51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onselen, P., and W. Errington. 2004. “Electoral Databases: Big Brother or Democracy Unbound?” Australian Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/1036114042000238555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. M., T. J. Reynolds, and K. Reynolds. 2010. “Decision-Based Voter Segmentation: An Application for Campaign Message Development.” European Journal of Marketing 44 (3/4): 310–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011020444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pons, V. 2016. “Has Social Science Taken over Electoral Campaigns and Should We Regret It?” French Politics, Culture & Society 34 (1): 34–47. https://doi.org/10.3167/fpcs.2016.340104.
   Google Scholar
• Power, S. 2020. Party Funding and Corruption. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Römmele, Andrea, and Rachel Gibson. 2020. “Scientific and Subversive: The Two Faces of the 4th Phase of Political Campaigning.” New Media & Society 22 (4): 595–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russmann, U. 2020. “Voter Targeting Online in Comparative Perspectives: Political Party Websites in the 2008/2009 and 2013 Austrian and German Election Campaigns.” Journal of Political Marketing 19 (3): 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2016.1179241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarrow, S. 2014. Beyond Party Members. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. 2014. “Ways of Doing Qualitative Content Analysis: Disentangling Terms and Terminologies.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 15 (1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-15.1.2043.
   Google Scholar
• Seawright, J., and J. Gerring. 2008. “Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (2): 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turow, J., M. X. Delli Carpini, N. A. Draper, and R. Howard-Williams. 2012. Americans Roundly Reject Tailored Political Advertising. Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania. http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/398.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D., and E. Nowlin. 2021. “Data-Driven Precision and Selectiveness in Political Campaign Fundraising.” Journal of Political Marketing 20 (2): 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2018.1457590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, R. 2005. “How Parties Used Segmentation in the 2005 British General Election Campaign.” Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice 7 (3): 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.dddmp.4340529.
   Google Scholar
• Zarouali, B., J. Strycharz, N. Helberger, and C. de Vreese. 2022. “Exploring People’s Perceptions and Support of Data-Driven Technology in Times of COVID-19: The Role of Trust, Risk, and Privacy Concerns.” Behaviour & Information Technology 41 (10): 2049–2060. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.2022208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar