The Selling of Experience in the 2022 Congressional Elections

References

• Abramowitz, Alan. 1991. “Incumbency, Campaign Spending, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections.” The Journal of Politics 53 (1):34–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achen, Christopher H., and Larry M. Bartels. 2017. “Democracy for Realists.” In Democracy for Realists. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonica, Adam. 2020. “Why Are There So Many Lawyers in Congress?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 45 (2):253–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. 1996. “A Dynamic Analysis of the Role of War Chests in Campaign Strategy.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (2):352–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnes, Nicholas, and Eric Hansen. 2022. “Chilling the Pipeline?: ‘Little Hatch Acts’ and the Representation of Government Employees in State Legislatives.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association: Montreal, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W., and Jonathan N. Katz. 1996. “Why Did the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections Grow?” American Journal of Political Science 40 (2):478–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, James N., Martin J. Kifer, and Michael Parkin. 2009. “Campaign Communications in US Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review. 103 (3):343–366
   Google Scholar
• Fenno, Richard. 1977. “U.S. House Members in Their Constituencies: An Exploration.” American Political Science Review 71 (3):883–917. https://doi.org/10.2307/1960097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorina, Morris P., Bruce Cain, and John A. Ferejohn. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmer, Justin. 2013. “Appropriators Not Position Takers: The Distorting Effects of Electoral Incentives on Congressional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (3):624–42. 2013https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronke, Paul. 2000. The Electorate, the Campaign, and the Office: A Unified Approach to Senate and House Elections. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Eric, and Sarah Treul. 2021. “Inexperienced or anti-Establishment? Voter Preferences for Outsider Congressional Candidates.” Research & Politics 8 (3):205316802110349. https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680211034958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder. 1987. News That Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Gary C., and Samuel Kernell. 1981. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Gary C. 1989. “Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946-86.” American Political Science Review 83 (3):773–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Gary C., and Jamie L. Carson. 2016. The Politics of Congressional Elections. 9th ed. New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Kam, Cindy D., and Elizabeth J. Zechmeister. 2013. “Name Recognition and Candidate Support.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (4):971–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkland, Patricia A., and Alexander Coppock. 2018. “Candidate Choice without Party Labels: New Insights from Conjoint Survey Experiments.” Political Behavior 40 (3):571–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9414-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, Michéle, Bo Yun Park, and Elena Ayala-Hurtado. 2017. “Trump’s Electoral Speeches and His Appeal to the American White Working Class.” The British Journal of Sociology 68 (S1):153–S180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12315.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lau, Richard R., and David P. Redlawsk. 2001. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (4):951–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, Maura, Rachel Porter, and Sarah Treul. 2020. “Running as a Woman? Candidate Presentation in the 2018 Midterms.” Political Research Quarterly 73 (4):967–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920915787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, Rachel A., and Sarah Treul. 2019. “Inexperience and Success in Congressional Primaries.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, Monica C. 2014. “Gender-Based Strategies on Candidate Websites.” Journal of Political Marketing 13 (4):264–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.958373.
   Google Scholar
• Treul, Sarah, and Eric Hansen. 2023. “Primary Barriers to Working Class Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 76 (3):1516–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912923115491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utych, Stephen M., and Cindy D. Kam. 2014. “Viability, Information Seeking, and Vote Choice.” The Journal of Politics 76 (1):152–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613001126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Public Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar