Development and Initial Validation of a Scale Measuring the Beliefs of Educators Regarding Response to Intervention

REFERENCES

• Batsche, G.M., Elliott, J., Graden, J.L., Grimes, J., Kovaleski, J.F., Prasse, D.,  … , & Tilly, W.D. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P.M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 400–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergan, J.R., & Kratochwill, T.R. (1990). Behavioral consultation and therapy. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, M.T., Adams, A., Sindelar, P.T., Waldron, N., & Vanhover, S. (2006). Learning from collaboration: The role of teacher qualities. Exceptional Children, 72, 169–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, M.K., Appleton, J.J., & Stehouwer, J.D. (2005). Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 381–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, M.K., Griffiths, A., Parson, L.B., Tilly, W.D., & VanDerHeyden, A.M. (2007). Response to Intervention: Research for practice. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M.K., & VanDerHeyden, A.M. (2006a). Using response to intervention to assess learning disabilities [Special issue]. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 3–64.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M.K., & VanDerHeyden, A.M. (2006b). Using response to intervention to assess learning disabilities: Introduction to the special series. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, J. M., & Curtis, M. J. (2014). Best practices in systems-level change. In P. L. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Systems-level services (pp. 11–28). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, J.M., Hines, C.M., Batsche, G.M., & Curtis, M.J. (2011). The Florida Problem Solving/Response to Intervention Project: Year 3 evaluation report. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Florida Problem Solving/Response to Intervention Project.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Dedrick, R.F., & Greenbaum, P.E. (2011). Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis of a scale measuring interagency collaboration of children's mental health agencies. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 19, 27–40. doi: 10.1177/1063426610365879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R.F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38, 47–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, L., Kerr, N., & Rosier, P. (2007). Annual growth for all students, catch-up growth for those who are behind. Kennewick, WA: The New Foundation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J.M., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to Intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 30–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2007). Responsiveness to intervention [Special issue]. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5), 4–67.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2010). All systems go: The change imperative for whole system reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, T.A., & DiPerna, J.C. (2007). Service delivery for response to intervention: Core components and directions for future research. School Psychology Review, 36, 526–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T.R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 381–391. doi: 10.1080/135406002100000512
   Google Scholar
• Gutkin, T.B., & Curtis, M.J. (2009). School-based consultation: The science and practice of indirect service delivery. In T.B. Gutkin & C.R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (pp. 591–635). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2015). Implementing change: Patterns, principles and potholes (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, J.D., Kosterman, R., Catalano, R.F., Hill, K.G., & Abbott, R. (2008). Effects of social development intervention in childhood 15 years later. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 162, 1133–1141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, S. (2009). A new definition. Journal of Staff Development, 30, 10–14, 16.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Dorman, C. (2008). Best practices in the display of data. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 2117–2132). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA), U.S.C. H.R. 1350 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T.R., Volpiansky, P., Clements, M., & Ball, C. (2007). Professional development in implementing and sustaining multitier prevention models: Implications for Response to Intervention. School Psychology Review, 36, 618–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaParo, K., Hamre, B., Locasale-Crouch, J., Pianta, R., Bryant, D., Early, D.,  … , & Burchinal, M. (2009). Quality in kindergarten classrooms: Observational evidence for the need to increase children's learning opportunities in early education classroom. Early Education and Development, 20, 657–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learning Forward. (2011). Standards for professional learning. Oxford, OH: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Lohrmann, S., Forman, S., Martin, S., & Palmieri, M. (2008). Understanding school personnel's resistance to adopting schoolwide positive behavior support at a universal level of intervention. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10, 256–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, R.G. (2004). Exceptional returns: Economic, fiscal, and social benefits of investment in early childhood development. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McMullen, M., Elicker, J., Wang, J., Erdiller, Z., Lee, S., Lin, C., & Sun, P. (2005). Comparing beliefs about appropriate practice among early childhood education and care professionals from the U.S., China, Taiwan, Korea, and Turkey. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20, 451–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998–2010). Mplus user's guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (n.d.). Multilevel modeling with latent variables using Mplus. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of School Psychologists. (2010). Model for comprehensive and integrated school psychological services. Bethesda, MD: Author.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), U.S.C. 115 STAT. 1426 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Noell, G.H., & Gansle, K.A. (2006). Assuring the form has substance: Treatment plan implementation as the foundation of assessing responses to intervention. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Noell, G.H., Witt, J.C., Slider, N.J., Connell, J.E., Gatti, S.L., Williams, K.L.,  … , & Duhon, G.J. (2005). Treatment implementation following behavioral consultation in schools: A comparison of three follow-up strategies. School Psychology Review, 34, 87–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, E.P., & Freeman, E.W. (2012). District-level considerations in supporting and sustaining RtI implementation. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 297–310. doi: 10.1002/pits.21598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families (U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-02-PO-0791). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S.W., Rowan, B., & Jin Kang, S. (1991). A multilevel, multivariate model for studying school climate with estimation via the EM algorithm and application to U.S. high school data. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 16, 295–330. doi: 10.3102/10769986016004295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarason, S.B. (1990). The predictable failure of school reform. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, G.T. (1978). Estimating the dimensions of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharratt, L., & Fullan, M. (2009). Realization: The change imperative for deepening district-wide reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. (2005). Power and sample size in multilevel modeling. In B.S. Everitt & D.C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (pp. 1570–1573). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, P., & Wolfe, B. (2008). Process components of effective professional development: Needs assessment, evaluation, and follow-up. In P.J. Winton, J.A. McCollum, & C. Catlett (Eds.), Practical approaches to early childhood professional development: Evidence, strategies, and resources (pp. 13–51). Washington, DC: Zero to Three.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, D. (2002). Designing professional development for teachers and principals. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Spectrum K12 School Solutions. (2011). Response to Intervention adoption survey 2011. Retrieved from http://www.spectrumk12.com/rti/the_rti_corner/rti_adoption_report
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, J.H., & Lind, J.C. (1980, May). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Iowa City, IA.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J.K. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 7–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. (2010). A blueprint for reform: The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L.S. (2006). A response to “Competing views: A dialogue on response to intervention”: Why response to intervention is necessary but not sufficient for identifying students with learning disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 58–61.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, H.M., & Shinn, M.R. (2010). Systemic, evidence-based approaches for promoting positive student outcomes within a multitier framework: Moving from efficacy to effectiveness. In M.R. Shinn & H.M. Walker (Eds.), Interventions for achievement and behavior problems in a three-tier model including RTI (pp. 1–26). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P.A., & Thomas, A.B. (2010). State laws for RTI: An updated snapshot. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42, 56–63.
   Google Scholar