348
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Identity exploration for maker educators: constructing meaning in after-school environmental science

, , &
Pages 535-556 | Received 24 Aug 2020, Accepted 31 Jan 2021, Published online: 04 Mar 2021

References

  • Arastoopour, G., Swiecki, Z., Chesler, N. C., & Shaffer, D. W. (2015). Epistemic network analysis as a tool for engineering design assessment. Presented at the American Society for Engineering Education, Seattle, WA.
  • Barany, A., & Foster, A. (2020). Context, community, and the individual: modeling identity in a game affinity space. The Journal of Experimental Education, 1–18.
  • Becker, S. L., & Jacobsen, M. (2020). Becoming a maker teacher: designing making curricula that promotes pedagogical change. Frontiers in Education, 5(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00083
  • Berry, R. Q., Bull, G., Browning, C., Thomas, C. D., Starkweather, K., & Aylor, J. H. (2010). Use of digital fabrication to incorporate engineering design principles in elementary mathematics education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 167–172.
  • Bevan, B. (2017). The promise and the promises of Making in science education. Studies in Science Education, 53(1), 75–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1275380
  • Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and “making” in education: The democratization of invention. In J. Walter‐Herrmann & C. Büching (Eds.), FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors (pp. 203–222). Transcript Publishers.
  • Brennan, K. (2014). Constructionism in the classroom: Three experiments in disrupting technocentrism. Constructionism and Creativity (pp. 1–8).
  • Calabrese Barton, A., Tan, E., & Greenberg, D. (2016). The makerspace movement: Sites of possibilities for equitable opportunities to engage underrepresented youth in STEM. Teachers College Record, 119(6), 11–44.
  • Carrier, S. J., Whitehead, A. N., Walkowiak, T. A., Luginbuhl, S. C., & Thomson, M. M. (2017). The development of elementary teacher identities as teachers of science. International Journal of Science Education, 39(13), 1733–1754. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1351648
  • Chee, Y. S., Mehrotra, S., & Ong, J. C. (2015). Professional development for scaling pedagogical innovation in the context of game-based learning: Teacher identity as cornerstone in “shifting” practice. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2014.962484
  • Cohen, J. (2017). Maker principles and technologies in teacher education: A national survey. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(1), 5–30.
  • Davis, B., Sumara, D., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2015). Engaging minds: Cultures of education and practices of teaching (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  • Fasso, W., & Knight, B. A. (2020). Identity development in school makerspaces: Intentional design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09501-z
  • Foster, A. (2014). CAREER: Projective reflection: Learning as identity exploration within games for science. National Science Foundation, Drexel University.
  • Foster, A., Shah, M., Barany, A., & Talafian, H. (2019). High school students’ role-playing for identity exploration: findings from virtual city planning. Information and Learning Sciences, 120(9/10), 640–662.
  • Geertz, C. (1972). Deep play: Notes on the balinese cockfight. Daedalus, 101(1), 1–37.
  • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
  • Harron, J. R., & Hughes, J. E. (2018). Spacemakers: A leadership perspective on curriculum and the purpose of K–12 educational makerspaces. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1461038
  • Hsu, Y. C., Baldwin, S., & Ching, Y. H. (2017). Learning through making and maker education. TechTrends, 61(6), 589–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0172-6
  • Jones, W. M., Caratachea, M., Schad, M., & Cohen, J. D. (2020). Examining K–12 teacher learning in a makerspace through the activity–identity–community framework. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1774824
  • Jones, W. M., Smith, S., & Cohen, J. (2017). Preservice teachers' beliefs about using maker activities in formal K-12 educational settings: A multi-institutional study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3–4), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1318097
  • Kaplan, A., & Flum, H. (2012). Identity formation in educational settings: A critical focus for education in the 21st century. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(3), 171–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.01.005
  • Kaplan, A., & Garner, J. K. (2017). A complex dynamic systems perspective on identity and its development: The dynamic systems model of role identity. Developmental Psychology, 53(11), 2036–2051. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000339
  • Kaplan, A., & Garner, J. K. (2018). Teacher identity and motivation: The dynamic systems model of role identity. In P. Schutz, J. Hong, & D. Cross Francis (Eds.), Research on teacher identity (pp. 71–82). Springer, Cham.
  • Kaplan, A., Sinai, M., & Flum, H. (2014). Design-based interventions for promoting students’ identity exploration within the school curriculum. In Motivational interventions (pp. 243–291). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0749-742320140000018012
  • Katz-Buonincontro, J., & Foster, A. (2013). Integrating the visual arts back into the classroom with mobile applications: Teaching beyond the “click and view” approach. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30(2), 52–59.
  • Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., & Terry, L. (2013). What knowledge is of most worth: Teacher knowledge for 21st century learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2013.10784716
  • Kjällander, S., Åkerfeldt, A., Mannila, L., & Parnes, P. (2018). Makerspaces across settings: Didactic design for programming in formal and informal teacher education in the Nordic countries. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2017.1387831
  • Kurti, R. S., Kurti, D. L., & Fleming, L. (2014). The philosophy of educational makerspaces part 1 of making an educational makerspace. Teacher Librarian, 41(5), 8.
  • Lin, Q., Yin, Y., Tang, X., Hadad, R., & Zhai, X. (2020). Assessing learning in technology-rich maker activities: A systematic review of empirical research. Computers & Education, 157, 103944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103944
  • Maaia, L. C. (2019). Inventing with maker education in high school classrooms. Technology & Innovation, 20(3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.21300/20.3.2019.267
  • Maloy, R., Kommers, S., Malinowski, A., & LaRoche, I. (2017). 3D modeling and printing in history/social studies classrooms: Initial lessons and insights. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 17(2), 229–249.
  • Marquart, C. L., Hinojosa, C., Swiecki, Z., Shaffer, D. W. (2020). Epistemic network analysis [Software]. http://app.epistemicnetwork.org
  • Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1099
  • Martin, L., & Dixson, C. (2016). Making as a pathway to engineering. In K. Peppler, E. R. Halverson, & Y. B. Kafai (Eds.), Makeology: Makers as learners (pp. 183–195). Routledge.
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  • Nguyen, X. N. C. M., & Dao, P. (2019). Identity exploration and development in TESOL teacher education: A three‐dimensional space narrative inquiry perspective. TESOL Journal, 10(4), e492. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.492
  • Oliver, K. M. (2016). Professional development considerations for makerspace leaders, part one: Addressing what? and why? TechTrends, 60(2), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0028-5
  • Panke, S. (2019). Design thinking in education: Perspectives, opportunities and challenges. Open Education Studies, 1(1), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0022
  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
  • Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism: Research reports and essays, 1985–1990.Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Petrich, M., Wilkinson, K., & Bevan, B. (2013). It looks like fun, but are they learning? In M. Honey & D. Kanter (Eds.), Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators (pp. 50–70). Routledge.
  • Shaffer, D. W. (2017). Quantitative ethnography. Cathcart Press.
  • Shaffer, D. W., Collier, W., & Ruis, A. R. (2016). A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: Analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), 9–45. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.33.3
  • Shaffer, D. W., Nash, P., & Ruis, A. R. (2015). Technology and the new professionalization of teaching. Teachers College Record, 117(12), 1–30.
  • Shaffer, D. W., & Ruis, A. (2017). Epistemic network analysis: A worked example of theory-based learning analytics. In C. Lang, G. Siemens, A. Wise, & D. Gašević (Eds.), Handbook of learning analytics (pp. 175–187). SOLAR.
  • Shah, M., Foster, A., & Barany, A. (2017). Facilitating learning as identity change throughgame-based learning. In Y. Baek (Ed.), Game-Based Learning: Theory, Strategies and Performance Outcomes (pp. 257–278). Nova Publishers.
  • Sheridan, K. M., Halverson, E. R., Litts, B. K., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014). Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505–531. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.brr34733723j648u
  • Siebert-Evenstone, A. L., Irgens, G. A., Collier, W., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A. R., & Shaffer, D. W. (2017). In search of conversational grain size: Modelling semantic structure using moving stanza windows. Journal of Learning Analytics, 4(3), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2017.43.7
  • Silvestri, K. N., McVee, M. B., Jarmark, C. J., Shanahan, L. E., Pytlak-Surdyke, M., & English, K. (2019). Teacher identity in an after-school engineering club: Navigating border crossing in an unfamiliar community of practice. The Elementary School Journal, 120(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1086/704542
  • Sullivan, S., Warner-Hillard, C., Eagan, B., Thompson, R. J., Ruis, A. R., Haines, K., Pugh, C. M., Shaffer, D. W., & Jung, H. S. (2018). Using epistemic network analysis to identify targets for educational interventions in trauma team communication. Surgery, 163(4), 938–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.11.009
  • Tucker-Raymond, E., & Gravel, B. E. (2019). STEM literacies in makerspaces: Implications for learning, teaching, and research. Routledge.
  • van den Scott, L.-J K. (2018). Visual methods in ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 47(6), 719–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241618806972
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1934/1986). Thought and language. The MIT Press.
  • Wallace, S., Banks, T., Sedas, M., Glazewski, K., Brush, T., & McKay, C. (2017). What will keep the fish alive? Exploring intersections of designing, making, and inquiry among middle school learners. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 8(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v8i1.22668
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
  • Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.