582
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Classroom interaction geography: visualizing space & time in classroom interaction

Pages 769-783 | Received 14 Dec 2020, Accepted 04 May 2021, Published online: 23 Jun 2021

References

  • Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373–397. https://doi.org/10.1086/461730
  • Ball, D. L., Ben-Peretz, M., & Cohen, R. B. (2014). Records of practice and the development of collective professional knowledge. British Journal of Educational Studies, 62(3), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2014.959466
  • Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012
  • Calandra, B., & Rich, P.J. (Eds.). (2014). Digital video for teacher education: Research and practice (1st ed.). Routledge.
  • Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Heinemann.
  • Cleveland, B. (2009). Equitable pedagogical spaces: teaching and learning environments that support personalisation of the learning experience. Critical & Creative Thinking, 17(2), 59–76.
  • Cohen, D. (2011). Teaching and its predicaments. Harvard University Press.
  • Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (2014). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
  • Derry, S. J., Pea, R., Barron, B., Engle, R., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., Hall, R., Koschmann, T., Lemke, J., Sherin, M., & Sherin, B. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903452884
  • Dunleavy, T. K. (2015). Delegating mathematical authority as a means to strive toward equity. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 8(1), 62–82.
  • Ehrenfeld, N., & Horn, I. S. (2020). Initiation-entry-focus-exit and participation: A framework for understanding teacher groupwork monitoring routines. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103(3), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09939-2
  • Erickson, F., Dorn, S., & Artiles, A. (2017). Learning how to look and listen: Building capacity for video based social & educational research. Spencer Foundation. https://www.learninghowtolookandlisten.com/
  • Greeno, J. (1998). Where is teaching?. Issues in Education, 4(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1080-9724(99)80079-2
  • Hagerstrand, T. (1970). What about people in regional science?. Papers in Regional Science, 24(1), 6–21.
  • Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., & Breyfogle, M. L. (2005). Questioning our patterns of questioning. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 10(9), 484–489. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.10.9.0484
  • Horn, I. S. (2008). Chapter 3: Accountable argumentation as a participation structure to support learning through disagreement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, 14, 97–126.
  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
  • Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lampert, M., & Cobb, P. (2003). Communication and Language. In J. Kilpatrick, W.G. Martin, & Deborah Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 237–249). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
  • Leander, K. (2002). Locating Latanya: The situated production of identity artifacts in classroom interaction. Research in the Teaching of English, 37(2), 198–250.
  • Lim, F. V., O’Halloran, K. L., & Podlasov, A. (2012). Spatial pedagogy: mapping meanings in the use of classroom space. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2012.676629
  • Louie, N. L. (2018). Culture and ideology in mathematics teacher noticing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9775-2
  • Ma, J., & Singer-Gabella, M. (2011). Learning to teach in the figured world of reform mathematics: Negotiating new models of identity. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110378851
  • Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2019). I spent more time with that team: Making the spatial pedagogy visible using positioning sensors. Proceedings of the 9th Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, USA. (pp. 21–25).
  • Martinez-Maldonado, R., Schulte, J., Echeverria, V., Gopalan, Y., & Shum, S. B. (2020). Where is the teacher Digital Analytics for classroom proxemics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(5), 741–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12444
  • Mathematics Teaching and Learning to Teach (MTLT), University of Michigan (2010). Sean Numbers-Ofala. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/65013
  • Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Harvard University Press.
  • Monahan, T. (2005). Globalization, technological change, and public education. Routledge.
  • O’Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 24(4), 318–335. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1993.24.4.04x0063k
  • Shah, N., & Coles, J. (2020). Preparing teachers to notice race in classrooms: Contextualizing the competencies of preservice teachers with antiracist inclinations. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(5), 584–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119900204
  • Shapiro, B. R., Garner, B., & Chae, H. S., Natriello, G. (2020). Classroom interaction geography: A case study. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS). International Society of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 1823–1830).
  • Shapiro, B. R., Hall, R., & Owens, D. (2017). Developing & using interaction geography in a museum. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(4), 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9264-8
  • Shapiro, B. R., Meng, A., O’Donnell, C., Lou, C., Zhao, E., Dankwa., B., & Hostetler, A. (2020). Re-shape: A method to teach data ethics for data science education. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘20). ACM, Honolulu, HI, USA, Paper 124. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376251
  • Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328155
  • Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V., & Philipp, R. (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes. Routledge.
  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE.
  • Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002455
  • Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2009). Closing the teaching gap. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(3), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909100307
  • Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) Video Study. (1999). TIMSS Video. http://www.timssvideo.com
  • van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 571–596.
  • Wilhelm, A. G. (2014). Mathematics teachers’ enactment of cognitively demanding tasks: Investigating links to teachers’ knowledge and conceptions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(5), 636–674. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.5.0636
  • Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/749877
  • Yin, R. (2009). Case study research. Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.