“You can tell a lot about a person by reading their bio”: lessons from inauthentic Twitter accounts’ activity in #Edchat"

References

• Anderson, S. (2012). A brief history of #Edchat [Blog post]. http://blog.web20classroom.org/2012/03/brief-history-of-Edchat.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bastos, M., & Farkas, J. (2019). “Donald Trump is my president!”: The Internet Research Agency propaganda machine. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 205630511986546. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119865466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos, M. T., & Mercea, D. (2019). The Brexit botnet and user-generated hyperpartisan news. Social Science Computer Review, 37(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317734157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the New Jim Code. Polity. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz162
   Google Scholar
• Britt, V. G., & Paulus, T. (2016). “Beyond the four walls of my building”: A case study of #Edchat as a community of practice. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1119609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunton, F. (2013). Spam: A shadow history of the internet. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. P., Kimmons, R., Short, C. R., Clements, K., & Staples, M. E. (2019). Teacher identity and crossing the professional-personal divide on Twitter. Teaching and Teacher Education, 81, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2014). How and why educators use Twitter: A survey of the field. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 414–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2014.925701
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. P., Staudt Willet, K. B., Koehler, M. J., & Greenhalgh, S. P. (2020). Spam and educators’ Twitter use: Methodological challenges and considerations. TechTrends, 64(3), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00466-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J., Tani, T., Morrison, S., & Keane, J. (2020). Exploring the landscape of educator professional activity on Twitter: An analysis of 16 education-related Twitter hashtags. Professional Development in Education, 1–22. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1752287
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (2003). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• DiResta, R., Shaffer, K., Ruppel, B., Sullivan, D., Matney, R., Fox, R., Albright, J., & Johnson, B. (2017). The tactics & tropes of the Internet Research Agency. New Knowledge. https://www.newknowledge.com/disinforeport
   Google Scholar
• Dousay, T. A., Wolf, L. G., Green, L. S., & Asino, T. I. (2018). Rise of the ‘teacher influencers’: Examining the benefits and conundrums. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2018 (pp. 1031–1033). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Fiesler, C., & Proferes, N. (2018). “Participant” perceptions of Twitter research ethics. Social Media & Society, 4(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366
   Google Scholar
• Forte, A., Humphreys, M., & Park, T. (2012, June). Grassroots professional development: How teachers use Twitter. Paper presented at the 6th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Frier, S. (2020). No filter: The inside story of Instagram. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, F., & Li, L. (2017). Examining a one-hour synchronous chat in a microblogging-based professional development community. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, S. P. (2021). Differences between teacher-focused Twitter hashtags and implications for professional development. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/1161
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, S. P., & Koehler, M. J. (2017). 28 days later: Twitter hashtags as "just in time" teacher professional development. TechTrends, 61(3), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0142-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, S. P., Koehler, M. J., Rosenberg, J. M., & Staudt Willet, K. B. (2021). Considerations for using social media data in learning design and technology research. In E. J. Romero-Hall (Ed.), Research methods in learning design and technology (pp. 64–77). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, S. P., Rosenberg, J. M., Staudt Willet, K. B., Koehler, M. J., & Akcaoglu, M. (2020). Identifying multiple learning spaces within a single teacher-focused Twitter hashtag. Computers & Education, 148, 103809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, S. P., Rosenberg, J. M., & Wolf, L. G. (2016). For all intents and purposes: Twitter as a foundational technology for teachers. E-Learning and Digital Media, 13(1–2), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753016672131
   Google Scholar
• Greenhow, C., Galvin, S. M., Brandon, D. L., & Askari, E. (2020). A decade of research on K-12 teaching and teacher learning with social media: Insights on the state of the field. Teachers College Record, 122(6), 1–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, M. K., & Segal, P. (2021). What pre-service teacher technology integration conceals and reveals: “Colorblind” technology in schools. Computers & Education, 170, 104225–104229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julien, H. (2008). Content analysis. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 121–122). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, M. W. (2017). rtweet: Collecting Twitter data. (Version 0.6.0) [R package]. https://cran.r-project.org/package=rtweet
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, S. L., & Schmeichel, M. J. (2018). Teacher Twitter chats: Gender differences in participants’ contributions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1458260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmons, R., & Veletsianos, G. (2018). Public internet data mining methods in instructional design, educational technology, and online learning research. TechTrends, 62(5), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0307-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., Shelton, C. C., Carpenter, J. P., & Greenhalgh, S. P. (2020). Where does all the money go? Free and paid transactions on TeachersPayTeachers.com. Teachers College Record. https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=23478
   Google Scholar
• Krutka, D. G., Bergman, D. J., Flores, R., Mason, K., & Jack, A. R. (2014). Microblogging about teaching: Nurturing participatory cultures through collaborative online reflection with pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 40, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krutka, D. G., Carpenter, J. P., & Trust, T. (2017). Enriching professional learning networks: A framework for identification, reflection, and intention. TechTrends, 61(3), 246–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0141-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krutka, D. G., & Damico, N. (2020). Should we ask students to tweet? Perceptions, patterns, and problems of assigned social media participation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(1), 142–175.
   Google Scholar
• Krutka, D. G., Manca, S., Galvin, S., Greenhow, C., Koehler, M., & Askari, E. (2019). Teaching “against” social media: Confronting problems of profit in the curriculum. Teachers College Record, 121(14), 1–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linvill, D. L., Boatwright, B. C., Grant, W. J., & Warren, P. L. (2019). THE RUSSIANS ARE HACKING MY BRAIN!’ Investigating Russia’s Internet Research Agency Twitter tactics during the 2016 United States presidential campaign. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linvill, D. L., & Warren, P. L. (2020). Troll factories: Manufacturing specialized disinformation on Twitter. Political Communication, 37(4), 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1718257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2014). Developing social media literacy: How children learn to interpret risky opportunities on social network sites. Communications, 39(3), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2014-0113
   Google Scholar
• Lukito, J. (2020). Coordinating a multi-platform disinformation campaign: Internet Research Agency activity on three U.S. social media platforms, 2015 to 2017. Political Communication, 37(2), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1661889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, T., Sickel, J., & Cheng, L. (2017). Preservice teachers’ participation and perception of Twitter live chats as personal learning networks. TechTrends, 61(3), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0137-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. E. (2018). Media. In D. G. Krutka, A. M. Whitlock, & M. Helmsing (Eds.), Keywords in the social studies: Concepts and conversations (pp. 293–304). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L. E., & Metzger, S. (2012). Reconceptualizing media literacy in the social studies: A pragmatist critique of the NCSS position statement on media literacy. Theory & Research in Social Education, 40(4), 436–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2012.724630
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M., & McLuhan, E. (2011). Media and formal cause. NeoPoiesis Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNamee, R. (2019). Zucked: Waking up to the Facebook catastrophe. Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, R. S. III. (2019). Report on the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, R., & Hicks, D. (2019). So I feel like we were just theoretical, whereas they actually do it”: Navigating Twitter chats for teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 19(2), 218–239.
   Google Scholar
• Nagle, J. (2018). Twitter, cyber-violence, and the need for a critical social media literacy in teacher education: A review of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nochumson, T. C. (2020). Elementary schoolteachers’ use of Twitter: Exploring the implications of learning through online social media. Professional Development in Education, 46(2), 306–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1585382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oltmann, S. M., Cooper, T. B., & Proferes, N. (2020). How Twitter’s affordances empower dissent and information dissemination: An exploratory study of the rogue and alt government agency Twitter accounts. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1988). A critique of technocentrism in thinking about the school of the future. In B. Sendov & I. Stanchev (Eds.), Children in the information age (pp. 3–18). Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Prestridge, S. (2019). Categorising teachers’ use of social media for their professional learning: A self-generating professional learning paradigm. Computers & Education, 129, 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. T. (2019). Behind the screen: Content moderation in the shadows of social media. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, N., Brown, M., & Vickery, A. (2020). Pinning for profit? Examining elementary preservice teachers’ critical analysis of online social studies resources about Black history. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(3), 497–528.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1052663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J. M., Reid, J. W., Dyer, E. B., Koehler, M. J., Fischer, C., & McKenna, T. J. (2020). Idle chatter or compelling conversation? The potential of the social media-based #NGSSchat network for supporting science education reform efforts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(9), 1322–1355. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, Y. (2019, June 13). Information operations on Twitter: Principles, process, and disclosure. Twitter blog. https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2019/information-ops-on-twitter.html
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, C., Schroeder, S., & Curcio, R. (2020). Instagramming their hearts out: What do edu-influencers share on Instagram?Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(3), 529–554.
   Google Scholar
• Staudt Willet, K. B. (2019). Revisiting how and why educators use Twitter: Tweet types and purposes in #Edchat. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(3), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1611507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staudt Willet, K. B., & Carpenter, J. P. (2020). Teachers on Reddit? Exploring contributions and interactions in four teaching-related subreddits. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(2), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1722978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staudt Willet, K. B., Koehler, M. J., & Greenhalgh, S. P. (2017). A tweet by any other frame: Comparing three theoretical frameworks for studying educator interactions on Twitter. In L. Liu & D. C. Gibson (Eds.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2017 (pp. 63–70). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Strate, L. (2017). Media ecology: An approach to understanding the human condition. Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Suomela, T., Chee, F., Berendt, B., & Rockwell, G. (2019). Applying an ethics of care to internet research: Gamergate and digital humanities. Digital Studies/Le Champ Numérique, 9(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.16995/dscn.302
   Google Scholar
• Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2014). Big questions for social media big data: Representativeness, validity, and other methodological pitfalls. In E. Adar, & P. Resnick (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. The AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Twitter. (2019). Twitter, Inc. and the 2018 midterm elections in the United States. Retrieved May 5, 2020, from https://blog.twitter.com/content/dam/blog-twitter/official/en_us/company/2019/2018-retrospective-review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Twitter. (n.d.-a). Civic integrity. Retrieved May 5, 2021, from https://about.twitter.com/en/our-priorities/civic-integrity
   Google Scholar
• Twitter. (n.d.-b). Information operations. Twitter Transparency Report. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://transparency.twitter.com/en/information-operations.html
   Google Scholar
• Vaidhyanathan, S. (2018). Anti-social media: How Facebook disconnects us and undermines democracy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2018). Social media platforms and education. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 579–591). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, R. D., Evering, L. C., & Barrett, D. E. (2014). #TwitterforTeachers: The implications of Twitter as a self-directed professional development tool for K–12 teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2014.925694
   Google Scholar
• Xing, W., & Gao, F. (2018). Exploring the relationship between online discourse and commitment in Twitter professional learning communities. Computers & Education, 126, 388–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar