373
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Gestalt perception: A game designed to explore players’ gameplay self-efficacy and anxiety reflected in their learning effects

, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 441-458 | Received 29 Apr 2021, Accepted 10 Aug 2021, Published online: 13 Sep 2021

References

  • Allan, J. D. (2010). An introduction to video game self-efficacy [Master’s thesis]. California State University Research Repository, California State University.
  • All, A., Castellar, E. P. N., & Van Looy, J. (2014). Measuring effectiveness in digital game-based learning: A methodological review. International Journal of Serious Games, 1(2),3–21. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v1i2.18
  • All, A., Castellar, E. P. N.,& Van Looy, J. (2016). Assessing the effectiveness of digital game-based learning: Best practices. Computers & Education, 92-93, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.007
  • Angeli, C., Valanides, N., Polemitou, E., & Fraggoulidou, E. (2016). An interaction effect between young children’s field dependence independence and order of learning with glass-box and black-box simulations: Evidence for the malleability of cognitive style in computer-supported learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.060
  • Arı, E., Yılmaz, V., & Dikec, B. E. (2020). An extensive structural model proposal to explain online gaming behaviors. Entertainment Computing, 34, 100340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2020.100340
  • Arruda, A. F. S., Aoki, M. S., Paludo, A. C., & Moreira, A. (2017). Salivary steroid response and competitive anxiety in elite basketball players: Effect of opponent level. Physiology & Behavior, 177, 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.05.017
  • Aydin, Y. I. Ç., Uzuntiryaki, E., & Demirdögˇen, B. (2011). Interplay of motivational and cognitive strategies in predicting self‐efficacy and anxiety. Educational Psychology, 31(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2010.518561
  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
  • Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606
  • Belk, M., Fidas, C., Germanakos, P., & Samaras, G. (2017). The interplay between humans, technology and user authentication: A cognitive processing perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.042
  • Bellini, C. G. P., Isoni Filho, M. M., de Moura Junior, P. J., & de Faria Pereira, R. D. C. (2016). Self-efficacy and anxiety of digital natives in face of compulsory computer-mediated tasks: A study about digital capabilities and limitations. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.015
  • Bendall, R. C. A., Lambert, S., Galpin, A., Marrow, L. P., & Cassidy, S. (2019). Psychophysiological indices of cognitive style: A triangulated study incorporating neuroimaging, eye-tracking, psychometric and behavioral measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 144, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.034
  • Betzel, R. F., Byrge, L., He, Y., Goñi, J., Zuo, X.-N., & Sporns, O. (2014). Changes in structural and functional connectivity among resting-state networks across the human lifespan. NeuroImage, 102 Pt 2, 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.067
  • Bouchard, T. J.Jr. (2016). Experience producing drive theory: Personality “writ large. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.007
  • Brown, S. G., Tenbrink, A. P., & LaMarre, G. (2019). Performance while distracted: The effect of cognitive styles and working memory. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 380–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.10.025
  • Brunet, J., & Sabiston, C. M. (2011). Self-presentation and physical activity in breast cancer survivors: The moderating effect of social cognitive constructs. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 33(6), 759–778. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.33.6.759
  • Bue, A. C. C. (in press). The looking glass selfie: Instagram use frequency predicts visual attention to high-anxiety body regions in young women. Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 106329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106329
  • Carlson, N. R., Miller, H., Donahoe, J. W., & Martin, G. N. (2010). Psychology: The science of behavior. Pearson Education.
  • Chang, B., Chen, S. Y., & Jhan, S. N. (2015). The influences of an interactive group-based videogame: Cognitive styles vs. prior ability. Computers & Education, 88, 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.006
  • Chesney, M. A., Neilands, T. B., Chambers, D. B., Taylor, J. M., & Folkman, S. (2006). A validity and reliability study of the coping self-efficacy scale. British Journal of Health Psychology, 11(Pt 3), 421–437. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910705X53155
  • Cornwell, B. R., Alvarez, R. P., Lissek, S., Kaplan, R., Ernst, M., & Grillon, C. (2011). Anxiety overrides the blocking effects of high perceptual load on amygdala reactivity to threat-related distractors. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 1363–1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.049
  • Curby, K. M., & Moerel, D. (2019). Behind the face of holistic perception: Holistic processing of Gestalt stimuli and faces recruit overlapping perceptual mechanisms. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 81(8), 2873–2880. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01749-w
  • Durik, A. M., Shechter, O. G., Noh, M., Rozek, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2015). What if I can’t? Success expectancies moderate the effects of utility value information on situational interest and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 39(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9419-0
  • Eccles, J. S. (2007). Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence. American Psychological Association.
  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
  • Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective Task Value and the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). Guilford Publications.
  • Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336
  • Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.
  • Fryer, L. K., Shum, A., Lee, A., & Lau, P. (in press). Mapping students’ interest in a new domain: Connecting prior knowledge, interest, and self-efficacy with interesting tasks and a lasting desire to reengage. Learning and Instruction, 75, 101493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101493
  • Fullagar, C. J., Knight, P. A., & Sovern, H. S. (2013). Challenge/skill balance, flow, and performance anxiety. Applied Psychology, 62(2), 236–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00494.x
  • Gibelli, J., Aubin-Horth, N., & Dubois, F. (2019). Individual differences in anxiety are related to differences in learning performance and cognitive style. Animal Behaviour, 157, 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.09.008
  • Gomila, T., & Calvo, P. (2008). Directions for an embodied cognitive science: Toward an integrated approach. In P. Calvo & T. Gomila (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive science: An embodied approach, 1–25. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-046616-3.X0001-1
  • Gu, A., & Xu, Y. (2012). The research of the generalized Fibonacci sequence -based propagation. Physics Procedia, 24, 1737–1741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.02.256
  • Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th  ed.). Prentice Hall.
  • Hair, J. F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (P LS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
  • Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., & Lin, P. H. (2015). Self-efficacy relevant to competitive anxiety and gameplay interest in the one-on-one competition setting. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63, 791–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9389-2
  • Hong, J. C. Hwang, M. Y., Tam, K. P., Lai, Y. H., & Liu, L. C (2012). MEffects of cognitive style on digital jigsaw puzzle performance: A GridWare analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 920–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.012
  • Hong, J. C. & Chan, C. H. (2018). Game performance in covariation reasoning: The correlates between gameplay self-efficacy, and metacognition reflected gameplay anxiety and gameplay interest. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(3), 131–162. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201809_63(3).0005
  • Howle, T. C., Dimmock, J. A., & Jackson, B. (2016). Relations between self-efficacy beliefs, self-presentation motives, personal task goals, and performance on endurance-based physical activity tasks. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.06.010
  • Howle, T. C., Dimmock, J. A., Whipp, P. R., & Jackson, B. (2015). The self-presentation motives for physical activity Questionnaire: Instrument development and preliminary construct validity evidence. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 37(3), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2014-0134
  • Huizenga, J. C., Ten Dam, G. T. M., Voogt, J. M., & Admiraal, W. F. (2017). Teacher perceptions of the value of game-based learning in secondary education. Computers & Education, 110, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.008
  • Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 880–895. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019506
  • Hulleman, C. S., Kosovich, J. J., Barron, K. E., & Daniel, D. B. (2017). Making connections: Replicating and extending the utility value intervention in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000146
  • Hwang, M. Y. Hong, J. C., Cheng, H. Y., Peng, Y. C., & Wu, N. C. (2013). Gender differences in cognitive load and competition anxiety affect 6th grade students’ attitude toward playing and intention to play at a sequential or synchronous game. Computers & Education, 60(1), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.06.014
  • Johnson, M. L., & Sinatra, G. M. (2013). Use of task-value instructional inductions for facilitating engagement and conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.09.003
  • Juhaňák, L., Zounek, J., Zaleska, K., Bárta, O., & Vlčková, K. (in press). The relationship between the age at first computer use and students’ perceived competence and autonomy in ICT usage: A mediation analysis. Computers & Education, 141, 103614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103614
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Sage.
  • Krypotos, A. M., Effting, M., Kindt, M., & Beckers, T. (2015). Avoidance learning: A review of theoretical models and recent developments. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 189. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00189
  • Kynigo, C., & Yiannoutsou, N. (2018). Children challenging the design of half-baked games: Expressing values through the process of game modding. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 17, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.04.001
  • Le, T. M., Huang, A. S., O’Rawe, J., & Leung, H.-C. (2020). Functional neural network configuration in late childhood varies by age and cognitive state. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 45, 100862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100862
  • Li, S., & Zheng, J. (2018). The relationship between self-efficacy and self-regulated learning in one-to-one computing environment: the mediated role of task values. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(6), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0405-2
  • Liao, G. Y., Cheng, T. C. E., Shiau, W. L., & Teng, C. I. (2021). Impact of online gamers’ conscientiousness on team function engagement and loyalty. Decision Support Systems, 142, 113468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113468
  • Lim, J. S., & Noh, G. Y. (2017). Effects of gain-versus loss-framed performance feedback on the use of fitness apps: Mediating role of exercise self-efficacy and outcome expectations of exercise. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.006
  • Lu, S. J., Liu, Y. C., Chen, P. J., & Hsieh, M. R. (2020). Evaluation of AR embedded physical puzzle game on students’ learning achievement and motivation on elementary natural science. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1541908
  • Luo, W. (2019). User choice of interactive data visualization format: The effects of cognitive style and spatial ability. Decision Support Systems, 122, 113061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2019.05.001
  • Mahvelati, E. H. (2020). Field-dependent/field-independent learners’ information processing behavior in an implicit learning task: Evidence from Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 49(6), 955–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09712-9
  • Malaquias, R. F., Malaquias, F. F. O., & Hwang, Y. (2018). Understanding technology acceptance features in learning through a serious game. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.008
  • Martens, R., Burton, D., Vealey, R. S., Bump, L. A., & Smith, D. E. (1990). Development and validation of the competitive state anxiety inventory-2. In R. Martens, R. S. Vealey, & D. Burtons (Eds.), Competitive anxiety in sport (pp. 117–190). Human Kinetics.
  • Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369
  • McMorris, T., Barwood, M., Hale, B. J., Dicks, M., & Corbett, J. (2018). Cognitive fatigue effects on physical performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiology & Behavior, 188, 103–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.01.029
  • Meguro, Y. (in press). The effects of individual differences in field dependence/independence and analogical reasoning for L2 instruction. System, 94, 102296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102296
  • Messick, D. M. (1993). Equality as a decision heuristic. In B. A. Mellers & J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice: Theory and applications (pp. 11–31). Cambridge University Press.
  • Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promises in educational research. Educational Psychologist, 19(2), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528409529283
  • Mills, N., Pajares, F., & Herron, C. (2006). A reevaluation of the role of anxiety: Self‐efficacy, anxiety, and their relation to reading and listening proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 39(2), 276–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02266.x
  • Miskovic, V., Ma, X., Chou, C. A., Fan, M., Owens, M., Sayama, H., & Gibb, B. E. (2015). Developmental changes in spontaneous electrocortical activity and network organization from early to late childhood. NeuroImage, 118, 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.013
  • Mkrtchian, A., Aylward, J., Dayan, P., Roiser, J. P., & Robinson, O. J. (2017). Modeling avoidance in mood and anxiety disorders using reinforcement learning. Biological Psychiatry, 82(7), 532–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.01.017
  • Morris, S., Farran, E. K., & Dumontheil, I. (2019). Field independence associates with mathematics and science performance in 5‐to 10‐year‐olds after accounting for domain‐general factors. Mind, Brain, and Education, 13(4), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12214
  • Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00170
  • Nisiforou, E., & Laghos, A. (2016). Field dependence-independence and eye movement patterns: Investigating users’ differences through an eye tracking study. Interacting with Computers, 28(4), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwv015
  • Nobre, G. C., Valentini, N. C., & Nobre, F. S. S. (2018). Fundamental motor skills, nutritional status, perceived competence, and school performance of Brazilian children in social vulnerability: Gender comparison. Child Abuse & Neglect, 80, 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.04.007
  • Nokelainen, P. (2006). An empirical assessment of pedagogical usability criteria for digital learning material with elementary school students. Educational Technology & Society, 9(2), 178–197.
  • Nori, R., Boccia, M., Palmiero, M., & Piccardi, L. (in press). The contribution of field independence in virtual spatial updating. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01788-3
  • Pekrun, R., Hall, N. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Boredom and academic achievement: Testing a model of reciprocal causation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 696–710. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036006
  • Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  • Protopapas, A., Katopodi, K., Altani, A., & Georgiou, G. K. (2018). Word reading fluency as a serial naming task. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(3), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1430804
  • Putwain, D. W., Symes, W., & Remedios, R. (2016). The impact of fear appeals on subjective-task value and academic self-efficacy: The role of appraisal. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.042
  • Respondek, L., Seufert, T., & Nett, U. E. (2019). Adding previous experiences to the person-situation debate of achievement emotions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.02.004
  • Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2004). Object identification in simultanagnosia: When wholes are not the sum of their parts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(2), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290342000564
  • Riding, R. J., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11(3–4), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341910110301
  • Robinson, O. J., Krimpsky, M., & Grillon, C. (2013). The impact of anxiety on response inhibition. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 69. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00069
  • Rozek, C. S., Hyde, J. S., Svoboda, R. C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2015). Gender differences in the effects of a utility-value intervention to help parents motivate adolescents in mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036981
  • Saracho, O. N. (1998). Research directions for cognitive style and education. International Journal of Educational Research, 29(3), 287–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(98)00032-9
  • Satpute, A. B., Shu, J., Weber, J., Roy, M., & Ochsner, K. N. (2013). The functional neural architecture of self-reports of affective experience. Biological Psychiatry, 73(7), 631–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.10.001
  • Schoneveld, E. A., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., & Granic, I. (2019). What keeps them motivated? Children’s views on an applied game for anxiety. Entertainment Computing, 29, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2018.12.003
  • Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50003-6
  • Seeley, W. W., Menon, V., Schatzberg, A. F., Keller, J., Glover, G. H., Kenna, H., Reiss, A. L., & Greicius, M. D. (2007). Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 27(9), 2349–2356. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007
  • Setiawan, Y. E., Purwanto, P., Parta, I. N., & Sisworo, S. (2019). Generalization strategy of linear patterns from field-dependent cognitive style. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.9134.77-94
  • Shin, D. D., Lee, M., Ha, J. E., Park, J. H., Ahn, H. S., Son, E., Chung, Y., & Bong, M. (2019). Science for all: Boosting the science motivation of elementary school students with utility value intervention. Learning and Instruction, 60, 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.003
  • Skrzypulec, B., & Chuderski, A. (2020). Nonlinear effects of spatial connectedness implicate hierarchically structured representations in visual working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 113, 104124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104124
  • Spielberger, C. (1972). Anxiety as an emotional state. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-657401-2.50009-5
  • Strachan, S. M., Marcotte, M. M., Giller, T. M., Brunet, J., & Schellenberg, B. J. (2017). An online intervention to increase physical activity: Self-regulatory possible selves and the moderating role of task self-efficacy. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 31, 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.05.001
  • Suliman, W. A., & Halabi, J. (2007). Critical thinking, self-esteem, and state anxiety of nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 27(2), 162–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2006.04.008
  • Sung, Y. T., Chao, T. Y., & Tseng, F. L. (2016). Reexamining the relationship between test anxiety and learning achievement: An individual-differences perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.07.001
  • van der Helm, P. A. (2015). Symmetry perception. In J. Wagemans (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of perceptual organization (pp. 108–128). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199686858.001.0001
  • Vos, N., van der Meijden, H., & Denessen, E. (2011). Effects of constructing versus playing an educational game on student motivation and deep learning strategy use. Computers & Education, 56(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.013
  • Walter, E., & Dassonville, P. (2010). In search of the hidden: Contextual processing in parietal cortex. Journal of Vision, 7(9), 1061–1061. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.1061
  • Waris, O., Jaeggi, S. M., Seitz, A. R., Lehtonen, M., Soveri, A., Lukasik, K. M., Soderstrom, U., Hoffing, R. A C., & Laine, M. (2019). Video gaming and working memory: A large-scale cross-sectional correlative study. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.005
  • Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/1169967
  • Woodman, T., Akehurst, S., Hardy, L., & Beattie, S. (2010). Self-confidence and performance: A little self-doubt helps. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(6), 467–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.05.009
  • Wu, Y. Y. (1987). Individual differences in cognitive factors.  Educational Review, 7, 253–300.
  • Yan, Y., Ren, J., Sun, G., Zhao, H., Han, J., Li, X., Marshall, S., & Zhan, J. (2018). Unsupervised image saliency detection with gestalt-laws guided optimization and visual attention based refinement. Pattern Recognition, 79, 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2018.02.004
  • Yang, X. Zhang, M., Kong, L., Wang, Q. & Hong, J. C. (2021). The effects of scientific self-efficacy and cognitive anxiety on science engagement with the “Question-Observation-Doing-Explanation” model during school disruption in COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(3), 380–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09877-x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.