Evaluating the role of professional development on elementary teachers’ knowledge, comfort, and beliefs related to teaching computer science to students with high-incidence disabilities

References

• Alarcon, G. M. (2011). A meta-analysis of burnout with job demands, resources, and attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, B., Grandgenett, N., Nugent, G., & Adamchuk, V. (2010). Robots, GPS/GIS, and programming technologies: The power of "Digital Manipulatives" in youth extension experiences. Journal of Extension, 48, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2009.5350828
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M. S. (1951). The effect of standardization on a Chi-square approximation in factor analysis. Biometrika, 38(3–4), 337–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/38.3-4.337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, T., Duncan, C., & Rainer, A. (2018). What is coding? In Humble, S. (Ed.), Creating the coding generation in primary schools (pp. 3–21). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315545813-2 
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L., Matkins, J. J., & Gansneder, B. M. (2011). Impacts of contextual and explicit instruction on pre-service elementary teachers’ understandings of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 414–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, T., & Vahrenhold, J. (2018). CS unplugged—How is it used, and does it work? In Böckenhauer, H. J., Komm, D., & Unger, W. (Eds.), Adventures between lower bounds and higher altitudes (pp. 497–521). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98355-4
   Google Scholar
• Bender, W. N. (2010). Learning disabilities: Characteristics, identification and teaching strategies (5th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Best, R. M., Floyd, R. G., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Differential competencies contributing to children’s comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading Psychology, 29(2), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710801963951
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2021, September 8). Computer and Information Research Scientists. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/computer-and-information-research-scientists.htm#tab-1
   Google Scholar
• Canter, L. L., King, L., Williams, J., Metcalf, D., & Potts, K. R. (2017). Evaluating pedagogy and practice of universal design for learning in public schools. Exceptionality Education International, 27(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v27i1.7743
   Google Scholar
• Center for Applied Special Technology (CAST). (2021). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. The UDL Guidelines. http://udlguidelines.cast.org
   Google Scholar
• Clendon, S. A., & Erickson, K. A. (2008). The vocabulary of beginning writers: Implications for children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(4), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610802463999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., & Plano-Clark, V. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Smythe, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2008). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dingly, A., & Seychell, D. (2015). The new digital natives: Cutting the cord. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46590-5
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 202–224. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.35.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, J. (2017). How preservice teachers use children’s literature to teach mathematical concepts: Focus on mathematical knowledge for teaching. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 9(4), 741–752. Retrieved from https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/282
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2020). Flip the script on change: Experience shapes teachers’ attitudes and beliefs. The Learning Professional, 41(2), 18–22. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/edp_facpub/45/?utm_source=uknowledge.uky.edu%2Fedp_facpub%2F45&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, A. (2020). Computer science for all is a right, not an option. In Proceedings of the 2019 Connected Learning Summit. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University: Etc. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, A., Colwell, J., & Taylor, V. (2020a). Results of a design-based implementation research study of how elementary teachersrespond to a model of professional development for integrating computer science into literacy instruction. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Literacy Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, A., Colwell, J., Gutierrez, K., Evmenova, A., Offutt, J., Taylor, V. (2021). Designing a model of computer science professional development for elementary educators in Inclusive settings. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 29(2), 165–193.
   Google Scholar
• Israel, M., Wherfel, Q. M., Pearson, J., Shehab, S., & Tapia, T. (2015). Empowering K-12 students with disabilities to learn computational thinking and computer programming. Teaching Exceptional Children, 48(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915594790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Ozuru, Y., & Floyd, R. G. (2011). Comprehension challenges in the fourth grade: The roles of text cohesion, text genre, and readers’ prior knowledge. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4, 229–258.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, E. J. (2017). Modeling as teaching: Preparing preservice teachers to implement Universal Design for Learning. (Publication No. 4485). [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Tennessee, Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange (TRACE).
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2021). Students with Disabilities. Condition of Education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved April 20, 2021, from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cgg.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, L. L. (2021). Design and deliver: Planning and teaching using universal design for learning (2nd ed) Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Offutt, J., Ammann, P., Dobolyi, K., Kauffman, C., Lester, J., Praphamontripong, U., Rangwala, H., Setia, S., Wang, P., White, L. (2017, April). A novel self-paced model for teaching CS1 and CS2. Learning at Scale, Boston, MA. https://sparc.cs.gmu.edu/pubs/SPARC-LatS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pogere, E. F., Lopez-Sangil, M. C., Mar Garcia-Senoran, M., & Gonzalez, A. (2019). Teachers’ job stressors and coping strategies: Their structural relationships with emotional exhaustion and autonomy support. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prater, M. (2018). Learner characteristics and special education laws. In Teaching students with high-incidence disabilities (pp. 2–51). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071800522
   Google Scholar
• Rao, K., & Meo, G. (2016). Using universal design for learning to design standards-based lessons. SAGE Open, 6(4), 215824401668068–215824401668012. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016680688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. (2015). Fiction and non-fiction in preferred books. Reading Psychology, 36(4), 350–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2013.865692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing and elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vee, A. (2017). Coding literacy. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10655.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, A., Zhou, N., Mayfield, C., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2011). Introducing computational thinking in education courses [Paper presentation]. In Cortina, T. J., Walker, E. L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on computer science education, Dallas, TX. (pp. 465–470). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953297
   Google Scholar