Measuring Academic Language Proficiency in School-Age English Language Proficiency Assessments Under New College and Career Readiness Standards in the United States

REFERENCES

• Abedi, J., & Linquanti, R. (2012). Issues and opportunities in improving the quality of large scale assessment systems for English language learners. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://ell.stanford.edu
   Google Scholar
• Ackermann, K., De Jong, J. H. A. L., Kilgarriff, A., & Tugwell, D. (2010, September). The Pearson international corpus of academic English (PICAE) (Research Summary). London, UK: Pearson Education. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonpte.com/research/Documents/RS_PICAE_2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre-Muñoz, Z., Parks, J. E., Benner, A., Amabisca, A., & Boscardin, C. K. (2006). Consequences and validity of performance assessment for English language learners: Conceptualizing & developing teachers’ expertise in academic language (CSE Technical Report 700). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Center for the Study of Evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R700.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anstrom, K., DiCerbo, P., Butler, F., Katz, A., Millet, J., & Rivera, C. (2010). A review of the literature on academic English: Implications for K–12 English language learners. Arlington, VA: The George Washington University Center for Equity and Excellence in Education. Retrieved from http://www.ceee.gwu.edu/Academic%20Lit%20Review_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arizona Department of Education. (2011). English language proficiency standards. Phoenix, AZ: Author. Retrieved from http://www.azed.gov/english-language-learners/elps/
   Google Scholar
• Arizona Department of Education. (2012, July). State of Arizona ESEA flexibility request. Phoenix, AZ: Author. Retrieved from http://www.azed.gov/eseawaiver/files/2012/01/approved-arizona-esea-flexibility-waiver-request.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center. (2009). Framework for high-quality English language proficiency standards and assessments. San Francisco, CA: WestEd. Retrieved from http://www.aacompcenter.org/pdf/ELPFramework_Jan2009_AACC.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. L. (2007). Introduction: Teaching and assessing students learning English in school. In A. L. Bailey ( Ed.), The language demands of school: Putting academic English to the test ( pp. 1 –26). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. L. (2010a). Assessment in schools—Oracy. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw ( Eds.), International encyclopedia of education ( Vol. 3, pp. 285 –292). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. L. (2010b). Implications for assessment and instruction. In M. Shatz, & L. Wilkinson ( Eds.), The Education of English Language Learners: Research to practice (pp. 222–247). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. L., & Butler, F. A. (2007). A conceptual framework of academic English language for broad application to education. In A. L. Bailey ( Ed.), The language demands of school: Putting academic English to the test ( pp. 68 –102). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. L., Butler, F. A., & Sato, E. (2007). Standards-to-standards linkage under Title III: Exploring common language demands in ELD and science standards. Applied Measurement in Education, 20(1), 53 –78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. L. Heritage, M., & Butler, F. A. (2014). Developmental considerations and curricular contexts in the assessment of young language learners. In A. J. Kunnan ( Ed.), The companion to language assessment. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. L., & Wolf, M. K. (2012). The challenge of assessing language proficiency aligned to the Common Core State Standards and some possible solutions. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://ell.stanford.edu
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D. (2009). A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 275 –311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Leech, G. (2002). Longman student grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., Helt, M., Clark, V., Cortes, V., Csomay, E., & Urzua, A. (2004). Representing language use in the university: Analysis of the TOEFL 2000 spoken and written academic language corpus (TOEFL Monograph Series No. MS-25). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/ Media/Research/pdf/RM-04-03.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bunch, G. C. (2006). “Academic English” in the 7th grade: Broadening the lens, expanding access. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(4), 284 –301.
   Google Scholar
• Bunch, G. C., Kibler, A., & Pimentel, S. (2012). Realizing opportunities for English learners in the Common Core English language arts and disciplinary literacy standards. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://ell.stanford.edu
   Google Scholar
• Butler, F. A., Lord, C., Stevens, R., Borrego, M., & Bailey, A. L. (2004). An approach to operationalizing academic language for language test development purposes: Evidence from fifth-grade science and math (CSE Report 626). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Center for the Study of Evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R626.pdf
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Education. (2012). English language development standards. Sacramento, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/el/er/eldstandards.asp
   Google Scholar
• Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jamieson, J. M. ( Eds.). (2008). Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, V. P. (1987). Age and rate of acquisition of second language for academic purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 21(4), 617 –641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010a). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010b). Common core state standards for mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ Math%20Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Council of Chief State School Officers. (2012). Framework for English Language Proficiency Development Standards Corresponding to the Common Core State Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards. Washington, DC: CCSSO.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, S., Salsbury, T., & McNamara, D. (2009). Measuring L2 lexical growth using hypernymic relationships. Language Learning, 59(2), 307 –334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question, and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism, Toronto 19, 197 –202.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (1984). Wanted: A theoretical framework for relating language proficiency to academic achievement among bilingual students. In C. Rivera ( Ed.), Language proficiency and academic achievement ( pp. 2 –19). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Del Vecchio, A., & Guerrero, M. (1995). Handbook of English language proficiency tests. Retrieved from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/files/rcd/BE020503/Handbook_of_English.pdf
   Google Scholar
• English Language Proficiency Standards, Title 19 Part II Texas Administrative Code §74.4 (2007). Retrieved from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter074/ch074a.html#74.4
   Google Scholar
• Ernst-Slavit, G., & Mason, M. R. (2011, April). Teacher talk, academic language, and English language learners (ELLs): Unpacking the discourse divide. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London, UK: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, G. A., & Moje, E. B. (2012). What is the development of literacy the development of? Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://ell.stanford.edu
   Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N. (2011, April). District understandings of academic language and language standards in 20 states. Paper presented in the symposium Perspectives on Academic Language and Its Role in Content and Language Standards at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, J. (2007). Policy needs: What federal and state governments need from language research. In A. L. Bailey ( Ed.), The language demands of school: Putting academic English to the test ( pp. 50 –67). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mesmer, H. A., & Hiebert, E. H. (2011, April). Increasingly more complex text and the comprehension of below-level readers. Paper presented in the symposium Perspectives on Text Complexity within the Common Core Standards at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 101, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002a).
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 301, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002b).
   Google Scholar
• Purpura, J. E. (2004). Assessing grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, H., Lee, O., & Valdés, G. (2012). Language demands and opportunities in relation to Next Generation Science Standards for English language learners: What teachers need to know. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://ell.stanford.edu
   Google Scholar
• Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. ( Eds.). (2003). The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Scarcella, R. (2003). Academic English: A conceptual framework (Technical Report 2003-1). Santa Barbara, CA: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2001). Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education, 12(4), 431 –459.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., & Uccelli, P. (2009). The challenge of academic language. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance ( Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy ( pp. 112 –133). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strengthening America’s Public Schools Through Promoting Foreign Investment Act (H.R. 1139). Introduced March 13th, 2013, 113th Congress. Retrieved from http://owens.house. gov/news/ documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=324145
   Google Scholar
• Stow, C., & Dodd, B. (2003). Providing an equitable service to bilingual children in the UK: A review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 38(4), 351 –377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. (2006). PreK–12 English language proficiency standards. Alexandria, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, C. L. (2008). Understanding the desirability of English language education in Taiwan. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 9(1), 83 –86.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service. (2012). National evaluation of Title III implementation—A survey of states’ English language proficiency standards. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Van Lier, L., & Walqui, A. (2012). Language and the Common Core State Standards. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://ell.stanford.edu
   Google Scholar
• WestEd. (2008). Language demands—Academic English language functions. San Francisco, CA: Author. Retrieved from https://www.azed.gov/wp-content/uploads/PDF/ Language DemandsLanguageComplexities.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. K., Kao, J. C., Herman, J. L., Bachman, L. F., Bailey, A. L., Bachman, P. L., Farnsworth, T., & Chang, S. M. (2008). Issues in assessing English language learners: English language proficiency measures and accommodation uses—Literature review (CRESST Report 731). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. Retrieved from http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/r731.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World-Class Instructional Design and Assessment. (2012). Amplification of the English language development standards, kindergarten–grade 12. Madison, WI: Author. Retrieved from http://www.wida.us/standards/eld.aspx#2012
   Google Scholar