1,137
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Country and Gender Differences in the Functioning of CEFR-Based Can-Do Statements as a Tool for Self-Assessing English Proficiency

&

References

  • Adler, P. A., Kless, S. J., & Adler, P. (1992). Socialization to gender roles: Popularity among elementary school boys and girls. Sociology of Education, 65(3), 169–187.
  • Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & F. Csaki (Eds.), Second international symposium on information theory (pp. 267–281). Budapest, Hungary: Academiai Kiado.
  • Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 12–19. doi:10.1080/00405840802577544
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
  • Barkaoui, K. (2013). Using multilevel modeling in language assessment research: A conceptual introduction. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10(3), 241–273. doi:10.1080/15434303.2013.769546
  • Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tilly, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
  • Bernat, E., & Lloyd, R. (2007). Exploring the gender effect on EFL learners’ beliefs about language learning. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 7, 79–91.
  • Beyer, S. (1990). Gender differences in the in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 960–970. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.960
  • Blanche, P., & Merino, B. (1989). Self-assessment of foreign language skills: Implications for teachers and researchers. Language Learning, 39(3), 313–340. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00595.x
  • Blue, G. M. (1994). Self-assessment of foreign language skills: Does it work? CLE Working Papers, 3, 18–35.
  • Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40. doi:10.1023/A:1021302408382
  • Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (1989). Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: A critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18(5), 529–549. doi:10.1007/BF00138746
  • Brantmeier, C., & Vanderplank, R. (2008). Descriptive and criterion-referenced self-assessment with L2 readers. System, 36(3), 456–477. doi:10.1016/j.system.2008.03.001
  • Brantmeier, C., Vanderplank, R., & Strube, M. (2012). What about me?: Individual self-assessment by skill and level of language instruction. System, 40(1), 144–160. doi:10.1016/j.system.2012.01.003
  • Chen, Y. (2008). Learning to self-assess oral performance in English: A longitudinal case study. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 235–262. doi:10.1177/1362168807086293
  • Cheng, Y. (2002). Factors associated with foreign language writing anxiety. Foreign Language Annals, 35(6), 647–656. doi:10.1111/flan.2002.35.issue-6
  • Chiu, M. M., & Klassen, R. M. (2010). Relations of mathematics self-concept and its calibration with mathematics achievement: Cultural differences among fifteen-year-olds in 34 countries. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 2–17. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.002
  • Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113–143. doi:10.3102/003465430298563
  • Council of Europe. (2001). The common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dewaele, J.-M. (2005). Sociodemographic, psychological and politicocultural correlates in Flemish students’ attitudes towards French and English. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 26(2), 118–137. doi:10.1080/01434630508668400
  • Dörnyei, Z., & Clément, R. (2001). Motivational characteristics of learning different target languages: Results of a nationwide survey. In Z. Dornyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 399–432). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
  • Ehrlich, S. (2004). Language and gender. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 304–327). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Esfandiari, R., & Myford, C. M. (2013). Severity differences among self-assessors, peer-assessors, and teacher assessors rating EFL essays. Assessing Writing, 18(2), 111–131. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.12.002
  • European Commission. (2012a). First European survey on language competences: Final report. Luxembourg City, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • European Commission. (2012b). First European survey on language competences: Technical report. Luxembourg City, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Fischer, G. (2000). Lifelong learning - more than training. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(3), 265–294.
  • Fox, S., & Dinur, Y. (1988). Validity of self-assessment: A field evaluation. Personnel Psychology, 41, 581–592. doi:10.1111/peps.1988.41.issue-3
  • Fulcher, G. (2004). Deluded by artifices? The common European framework and harmonization. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(4), 253–266. doi:10.1207/s15434311laq0104_4
  • Huang, C. (2013). Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 1–35. doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0097-y
  • Hulstijn, J., Alderson, C., & Schoonen, R. (2010). Developmental stages in second language acquisition and levels of second language proficiency: Are there links between them? In I. Bartning, M. Martin, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: Intersections between SLA and language testing research (pp. 11–20). Rome, Italy: Eurosla Monographs.
  • Janssen, R., Wouters, S., Huygh, T., Denies, K., & Verschueren, K. (2015). The effect of peer group performance on the self-concept of reading in a foreign language. Educational Psychology, 35(2), 158–175.
  • Jones, N., & Saville, N. (2009). European language policy: Assessment, learning, and the CEFR. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 51–63. doi:10.1017/S0267190509090059
  • Jungert, T., & Andersson, U. (2013). Self-efficacy beliefs in mathematics, native language literacy and foreign language amongst boys and girls with and without mathematic difficulties. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(1), 1–15. doi:10.1080/00313831.2011.621140
  • Kingston, N. M., Kahl, S. R., Sweeney, K., & Bay, L. (2001). Setting performance standards using the body of work method. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods and perspectives (pp. 219–248). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Koestner, R., & Aube, J. (1995). A multifactorial approach to the study of gender characteristics. Journal of Personality, 63(3), 681–710. doi:10.1111/jopy.1995.63.issue-3
  • Koul, R., Roy, L., Kaewkuekool, S., & Ploisawaschai, S. (2009). Multiple goal orientations and foreign language anxiety. System, 37(4), 676–688. doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.09.011
  • Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
  • Leach, L. (2012). Optional self-assessment: Some tensions and dilemmas. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(2), 137–147. doi:10.1080/02602938.2010.515013
  • Little, D. (2005). The common European framework and the European language Portfolio: Involving learners and their judgements in the assessment process. Language Testing, 22(3), 321–336. doi:10.1191/0265532205lt311oa
  • Little, D. (2011). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 44(3), 381–393.
  • MacIntyre, P. D., Noels, K. A., & Clément, R. (1997). Biases in self-ratings of second language proficiency: The role of language anxiety. Language Learning, 47(2), 265–287. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.81997008
  • Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K., O’Mara, A. J., et al. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 319–350. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9075-6
  • Martyniuk, M., & Noyons, J. (2007). Executive summary of results of a survey on the use of CEFR at national level in the council of Europe member states. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
  • Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149–174. doi:10.1007/BF02296272
  • Matsumo, S. (2009). Self-, peer- and teacher-assessments in Japanese University EFL writing classrooms. Language Testing, 26(1), 75–100. doi:10.1177/0265532208097337
  • Menard, S. (2010). Logistic regression: From introduction to advanced concepts and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mills, N., Pajares, F., & Herron, C. (2006). A reevaluation of the role of anxiety: SE, anxiety and their relation to reading and listening proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 39(2), 276–293. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02266.x
  • Mitzel, H. C., Lewis, D. M., Patz, R. J., & Green, D. R. (2001). The bookmark procedure: Psychological perspectives. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods and perspectives (pp. 249–281). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Morony, S., Kleitman, S., Lee, Y., & Stankov, L. (2013). Predicting achievement: Confidence vs. self-efficacy, anxiety, and self-concept in Confucian and European countries. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 79–96. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2012.11.002
  • Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Rudman, L. A. (2010). When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 11(2), 140–151. doi:10.1037/a0018093
  • North, B. (2004, April 15). Europe’s framework promotes language discussion, not directives. Education Guardian [online edition]. Retrieved August 21, 2013, from http://www.theguardian.com/education/2004/apr/15/tefl6
  • Oscarson, M. (2013). The challenge of student self-assessment in language education. Voices in Asia Journal, 1(1), 1–14.
  • Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 116–125. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_8
  • Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (1997). Influence of self-efficacy on elementary students’ writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(6), 353–360. doi:10.1080/00220671.1997.10544593
  • Palier, G. (2003). Gender differences in the self-assessment of accuracy on cognitive tasks. Sex Roles, 48(5–6), 265–276. doi:10.1023/A:1022877405718
  • Park, G., & French, B. F. (2013). Gender differences in the foreign language classroom anxiety scale. System, 41(2), 462–471. doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.04.001
  • Perlmann-Balme, M. (2013). European survey on language competences–comparability of A1 level competences across 5 languages. In M. Milanovic & C. J. Weir (Eds.), Studies in language testing: Exploring language frameworks (pp. 85–102). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pierce, B. M., Swain, M., & Hart, D. (1993). Self-assessment, French immersion, and locus of control. Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 25–42. doi:10.1093/applin/14.1.25
  • Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 269–281. doi:10.1111/pwqu.2002.26.issue-4
  • Raoofi, S., Tan, B. H., & Chan, S. H. (2012). Self-efficacy in second/foreign language learning contexts. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 60–73. doi:10.5539/elt.v5n11p60
  • Robinson, M. (2013). Innovation in language test development. Research Notes, 52, 7–12.
  • Ross, S. (1998). Self-assessment in second language testing: A meta-analysis and analysis of experiential factors. Language Testing, 15(1), 1–20.
  • Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: J. Wiley & Sons.
  • Rutkowski, L., Gonzalez, E., Joncas, M., & Von Davier, M. (2010). International large-scale assessment data: Issues in secondary analysis and reporting. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 142–151. doi:10.3102/0013189X10363170
  • Schmenk, B. (2004). Language learning: A feminine domain? The role of stereotyping in constructing gendered learner identities. TESOL Quarterly, 38(3), 514–524. doi:10.2307/3588352
  • Scholz, U., Doña, B. G., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(3), 242–251. doi:10.1027//1015-5759.18.3.242
  • Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
  • Sebba, J., Deakin Crick, R., Yu, G., Lawson, H., Harlen, W., & Durant, K. (2008). Systematic review of research evidence of the impact on students in secondary schools of self and peer assessment. In Research evidence in education library. London, UK: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
  • Siebert, L. L. (2003). Student and teacher beliefs about language learning. The ORTESOL Journal, 21, 7–39.
  • Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Sunderland, J. (2000). Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education. Language Teaching, 33(4), 203–223. doi:10.1017/S0261444800015688
  • Van Der Schoot, F. (2009). Cito variation on the bookmark method, in relating language examinations to the common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEFR)—A manual. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
  • Van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 95–108. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003
  • Whitehead, J. M. (1996). Sex stereotypes, gender identity and subject choice at ‘A’ level. Educational Research, 38(2), 147–160. doi:10.1080/0013188960380203
  • Williams, M., Burden, R., & Lanvers, U. (2002). ‘French is the language of love and stuff’: Student perceptions of issues related to motivation in learning a foreign language. British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 503–528. doi:10.1080/0141192022000005805
  • Wolfinger, R. (1993). Laplace’s approximation for nonlinear mixed models. Biometrika, 80(4), 791–795. doi:10.1093/biomet/80.4.791
  • Wu, M. (2005). The role of plausible values in large-scale surveys. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31(2–3), 114–128. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2005.05.005

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.