Exploring the Factor Structure of a K–12 English Language Proficiency Assessment

References

• Abedi, J. (Ed.), (2007). English language proficiency assessment in the nation: Current status and future practice. Davis, CA: University of California, Davis, School of Education. Retrieved from http://education.ucdavis.edu/sites/main/files/ELP_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Abedi, J., & Linquanti, R. (2012). Issues and opportunities in improving the quality of large scale assessment systems for ELLs. Conference Session, Palo Alto, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, L. F., Davidson, F., Ryan, K., & Choi, I.-C. (1995). An investigation into the comparability of two tests of English as a foreign language: The Cambridge-TOEFL comparability study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2015). Model revision and comparison. In T. A. Brown (Ed.), Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed., pp. 139–185). New York, USA: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Education. (2012, November). Overview of the California English language development standards and proficiency level descriptors. Sacramento, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/el/er/documents/sbeoverviewpld.pdf
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Education. (2015, April 1). Request for Proposals (RFP): English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (ELPAC). Author. Retrieved from www.cde.ca.gov/fg/fo/r19/documents/elpac14rfp.doc
   Google Scholar
• Chi, Y., Garcia, R. B., Surber, C., & Trautman, L. (2011). Alignment study between the common core state standards in English language arts and mathematics and the WIDA English language proficiency standards, 2007 edition, PreKindergarten through grade 12. Education. Norman, OK, USA: The University of Oklahoma Educational Training, Evaluation, Assessment, and Measurement (E-TEAM). Retrieved from https://www.wida.us/Research/Agenda/Alignment/index.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Chief State School Officers. (2012). Framework for English language proficiency development standards corresponding to the Common Core State Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Chief State School Officers. (2014). English language proficiency (ELP) standards with correspondences to K–12 English language arts (ELA), mathematics, and science practices, K–12 ELA standards, and 6–12 literacy standards. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.elpa21.org/sites/default/files/Final%204_30%20ELPA21%20Standards_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Council of Chief State School Officers. (2015, August 7). Request for Proposals for ELPA21 Operational Item Analysis and Calibration and Performance Standard Setting. Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.elpa21.org/sites/default/files/RFP%20-%20ELPA21%20Standard%20Setting%2008%2007%202015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Data Recognition Corporation. (2016). ACCESS for ELLs 2.0 test demo. Retrieved June 12, 2016, from http://assets.drcedirect.com/States/WIDA/Tutorials/Student/201510-html5/201510-html5.html
   Google Scholar
• Educational Testing Service. (2016 January). Proposed test blueprints for the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (ELPAC). California Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/ep/documents/elpacblueprts.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner-Bond, M., Shin, M., Wang, X., Zenisky, A. L., & Moyer, E. (2013). Score reports for English proficiency assessments: Current practices and future directions. Presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Frantz, R. S., Bailey, A. L., Starr, L., & Perea, L. (2014). Measuring academic language proficiency in school-age English language proficiency assessments under new college and career readiness standards in the United States. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(4), 432–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, L. (2014). Language ability of young English language learners: Definition, configuration, and implications. Language Testing, 32(1), 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakuta, K., Santos, M., & Fang, Z. (2013). Challenges and opportunities for language learning in the context of the CCSS and the NGSS. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(6), 451–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• In’nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2011). Structural equation modeling in language testing and learning research: A review. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(3), 250–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• In’nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2012). Factor structure of the revised TOEIC[R] test: A multiple-sample analysis. Language Testing, 29(1), 131–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY, USA: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). MPlus User’s Guide (Seventh). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). MPlus: Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables (Version 7) [Computer program]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2011). Allocating federal funds for state programs for English language learners. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=13090
   Google Scholar
• Oregon Department of Education, Office of Learning. (2016, March). ELPA21 test specifications 2015–16: Grade band 4–5. Author. Retrieved from http://www.ode.state.or.us/wma/teachlearn/testing/dev/testspecs/elpa21testspecsg4-5_1516.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Questar Assessment, Inc. (2014). New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT): 2012 Operational test technical report (Technical Report). Albany, NY: New York State Education Department. Retrieved from http://www.p12.nysed.gov/assessment/reports/
   Google Scholar
• Ragan, A., & Lesaux, N. K. (2006). Federal, state, and district level English language learner program entry and exit requirements: Effects on the education of language minority learners. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(20), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Rijmen, F. (2010). Formal relations and an empirical comparison among the bi-factor, the testlet, and a second-order multidimensional IRT model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47(3), 361–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Römhild, A., Kenyon, D. M., & MacGregor, D. (2011). Exploring domain-general and domain-specific linguistic knowledge in the assessment of academic English language proficiency. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(3), 213–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaki, Y., Stricker, L. J., & Oranje, A. H. (2009). Factor structure of the TOEFL internet-based test. Language Testing, 26(1), 5–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, C. B. (2009). Perspectives on a population: English-language learners in American Schools. Bethesda, MD: Editorial Projects in Education Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Tanenbaum, C., Boyle, A., Soga, K., Floch, L., Carlson, K., Golden, L., … O’Day, J. (2012). National evaluation of Title III implementation: Report on state and local implementation. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/title-iii/state-local-implementation-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2014). Consolidated state performance reports: Parts I and II school years 2013–14. Washington, DC: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/consolidated/sy09-10part1/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. K., Farnsworth, T., & Herman, J. (2008). Validity issues in assessing English language learners’ language proficiency. Educational Assessment, 13(2–3), 80–107.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. K., Kao, J., Herman, J., Bachman, L. F., Bailey, A. L., Bachman, P. L., & Chang, S. M. (2008). Issues in assessing English language learners: English language proficiency measures and accommodation uses (Literature review (CRESST Report 731)). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing (CRESST). Retrieved from https://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R731.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. K., Wang, Y., Blood, I., & Huang, B. H. (2014). Investigating the language demands in the Common Core State Standards for English language learners: A comparison study of standards. Middle Grades Research Journal, 9(1), 35–52.
   Google Scholar