References
- American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association. https://www.testingstandards.net/open-access-files.html
- Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford University Press.
- Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford University Press.
- The Canadian Press. (2021, April 22). Retaking language test unfair during COVID-19: Applicants to new residency pathway. CityNews Toronto. https://toronto.citynews.ca/2021/04/22/retaking-language-test-unfair-during-covid-19-applicants-to-new-residency-pathway/
- CELPIP (Director). (2019, November 12). CELPIP: Canada’s Leading English Language Test. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ry35MjUsqU
- Centre for Canadian Language Benchmarks. (2012). Canadian language benchmarks: English as a second language for adults. Citizenship and Immigration Canada. https://www.deslibris.ca/ID/235626
- Chen, M. Y., Liu, Y., & Zumbo, B. D. (2020a). A propensity score method for investigating differential item functioning in performance assessment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80(3), 476–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419878861
- Chen, M. Y., Wu, A. D., & Liu, Y. (2020b). Linking test-taking process to performance through mixed-effects regression models: A response process–based validation study. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 38(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282919861269
- Chen, M. Y., Zumbo, B. D., & Lam, W. (2016). Testing for differential item functioning with no internal matching variable and continuous item ratings [Poster Presentation]. Language Testing Research Colloquium. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/viewer.html?pdfurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.paragontesting.ca%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F12%2F2016-LTRC_Chen-M.-Y.-Lam-W.-Zumbo-B.-D.pdf&clen=551166&chunk=true
- Doe, C., Douglas, S. R., & Cheng, L. (2019). Mapping language use and communication challenges to the Canadian Language Benchmarks and CELPIP-General LS within workplace contexts for Canadian new immigrants (p. 59). Paragon Testing Enterprises. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/viewer.html?pdfurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.paragontesting.ca%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F06%2FFinal-Report_June-21.pdf&clen=533594&chunk=true
- Douglas, S. R. (2016). The relationship between lexical frequency profiling measures and rater judgements of spoken and written general English language proficiency on the CELPIP-General test. TESL Canada Journal, 32(9), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v32i0.1217
- Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada. (2022a, March 3). Language Testing—Skilled Immigrants (Express Entry) [Government Website]. https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/immigrate-canada/express-entry/documents/language-requirements/language-testing.html
- Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada. (2022b, February 14). New Immigration Plan to Fill Labour Market Shortages and Grow Canada’s Economy [News Releases]. https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/news/2022/02/new-immigration-plan-to-fill-labour-market-shortages-and-grow-canadas-economy.html
- Jezak, M., & Piccardo, E. (2017). Introduction: The Canadian Language Benchmarks and Niveaux de compaux de linguistique canadiens – Canadian Language Framework in the era of globalization. In Language is the Key: The Canadian Language Benchmarks Model (pp. 7–30). University of Ottawa Press/Les Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa. https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_631397
- Juha, J. (2021, April 29). Ottawa offers migrant workers new path to permanent residency. The London Free Press. https://lfpress.com/news/local-news/ottawa-offers-migrant-workers-new-path-to-permanent-residency
- Li, Z., Chen, M. Y., & Banerjee, J. (2020). Using corpus analyses to help address the DIF interpretation: Gender differences in standardized writing assessment. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01088
- Lin, Y.-M., & Chen, M. Y. (2020). Understanding writing quality change: A longitudinal study of repeaters of a high-stakes standardized English proficiency test. Language Testing, 37(4), 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220925448
- Li, Z., & Volkov, A. (2017). “To whom it may concern”: A study on the use of lexical bundles in email writing tasks in an English proficiency test. TESL Canada Journal, 34(3), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v34i3.1273
- McNamara, T. (2005). 21st century Shibboleth: Language tests, identity and intergroup conflict. Language Policy, 4(4), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-005-2886-0
- McNamara, T., & Ryan, K. (2011). Fairness versus justice in language testing: The place of English literacy in the Australian citizenship test. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.565438
- Mendoza, A. (2018). Measuring intra- and international linguistic competence: Appropriation of WEs and ELF discourse in the commercials for two standardized English tests. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 15(3), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2017.1388171
- Nakache, D., & Dixon-Perera, L. (2015). Temporary or transitional? Migrant workers’ experiences with permanent residence in Canada. Institute for Research on Public Policy. https://irpp.org/research-studies/temporary-or-transitional/. [ 55]
- Paragon Testing Enterprises. (2018). CELPIP test 2018 annual report (p. 22). chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/viewer.html?pdfurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.paragontesting.ca%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F02%2FCELPIP-Test-Report-2018-min.pdf&clen=722455&chunk=true
- Paragon Testing Enterprises. (2020, April 8). Download your official online score report! CELPIP. https://www.celpip.ca/download-your-official-online-score-report/
- Paragon Testing Enterprises. (2021a). CELPIP annual report of 2021 test takers. https://www.paragontesting.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/CELPIP-Test-Report-2021-1.pdf
- Paragon Testing Enterprises. (2021b). CELPIP test review report I: Test content, development, and validation (No. 2021–01; p. 22). chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/viewer.html?pdfurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.paragontesting.ca%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F05%2FCELPIP_Test_Report_I_2021.pdf&clen=505975&chunk=true
- Paragon Testing Enterprises. (2021c). CELPIP test review report II: Psychometric properties (No. 2021–2; p. 23). chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/viewer.html?pdfurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.paragontesting.ca%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F05%2FCELPIP_Test_Report_II_2021.pdf&clen=708574&chunk=true
- Paragon Testing Enterprises. (2021d, April 7). Prometric Canada® acquires paragon testing enterprises. Paragon Testing Enterprises. https://www.paragontesting.ca/prometric-canada-acquires-paragon-testing-enterprises/
- Paragon Testing Enterprises. (n.d.-a). Overview. CELPIP. Retrieved November 23, 2021 https://www.celpip.ca/take-celpip/overview/
- Paragon Testing Enterprises. (n.d.-b). Test Format. CELPIP. Retrieved September 10, 2022 https://www.celpip.ca/take-celpip/test-format/
- Paragon Testing Enterprises. (n.d.-c). Test Results. CELPIP. Retrieved February 28, 2022, from https://www.celpip.ca/take-celpip/test-results/
- Paragon Testing Enterprises. (n.d.-d). Who Accepts CELPIP. CELPIP. Retrieved September 10, 2022, from https://www.celpip.ca/take-celpip/score-users/
- Rodriguez, J. (2021, May 4). Thousands left out of plan to give temporary workers permanent residency: Migrant rights network | CTV news. CTV News. https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/thousands-left-out-of-plan-to-give-workers-permanent-residency-migrant-rights-network-1.5414144?utm_medium=trueAnthem&taid=6091d66acd14980001d873ca&utm_campaign=trueAnthem%3A+Trending+Content&utm_source=twitter&cid=sm%3Atrueanthem%3A%7B%7Bcampaignname%7D%7D%3Atwitterpost%E2%80%8B
- Wu, A. D., Chen, M. Y., & Stone, J. E. (2018). Investigating how test-takers change their strategies to handle difficulty in taking a reading comprehension test: Implications for score validation. International Journal of Testing, 18(3), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2017.1396464
- Wu, A. D., Park, M., & Hu, S.-F. (2021). Gender fairness in immigration language testing: A study of differential options functioning on the CELPIP-G reading multiple-choice questions. International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, 5(3), 244–264. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJQRE.2021.119811
- Wu, A. D., & Stone, J. E. (2016). Validation through understanding test-taking strategies: An illustration with the CELPIP-General reading pilot test using structural equation modeling. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(4), 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915608575
- Wu, A. D., Stone, J. E., & Liu, Y. (2016). Developing a validity argument through abductive reasoning with an empirical demonstration of the latent class analysis. International Journal of Testing, 16(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2015.1057826