Learning Phonology from Surface Distributions, Considering Dutch and English Vowel Duration

References

• Adank, P., van Hout, R., & Smits, R. (2004). An acoustic description of the vowels of Northern and Southern Standard Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 1729–1738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adriaans, F., & Swingley, D. (2017). Prosodic exaggeration within infant-directed speech: Consequences for vowel learnability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141, 3070–3078. doi:10.1121/1.4982246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman, M. E., & Edwards, J. (2000). The ontogeny of phonological categories and the primacy of lexical learning in linguistic development. Child Development, 71, 240–249. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bion, R. A., Miyazawa, K., Kikuchi, H., & Mazuka, R. (2013). Learning phonemic vowel length from naturalistic recordings of japanese infant-directed speech. PloS one, 8(2), e51594. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341–345.
   Google Scholar
• Booij, G. (1999). The phonology of Dutch. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brent, M. R., & Siskind, J. M. (2001). The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development. Cognition, 81, B33–B44. doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00122-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambier-Langeveld, T. (1997). The domain of final lengthening in the production of Dutch. In J. A. Coerts & H. de Hoop (Eds.), Linguistics in the netherlands (Vol. 14, pp. 13–24). Benjamins, Amsterdam. doi:10.1075/avt.14.04cam
   Google Scholar
• Chládková, K., Escudero, P., & Lipski, S. C. (2015). When “aa” is long but “a” is not short: Speakers who distinguish short and long vowels in production do not necessarily encode a short–Long contrast in their phonological lexicon. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 438. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, T. (2015). Language effects on timing at the segmental and suprasegmental levels. In M. Redford (Ed.), The handbook of speech production (pp. 505–529). Oxford, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cristià, A., McGuire, G. L., Seidl, A., & Francis, A. L. (2011). Effects of the distribution of acoustic cues on infants’ perception of sibilants. Journal of Phonetics, 39(3), 388–402. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2011.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich, C., Swingley, D., & Werker, J. F. (2007). Native language governs interpretation of salient speech sound differences at 18 months. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104, 16027–16031. doi:10.1073/pnas.0705270104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J., Beckman, M. E., & Fletcher, J. (1991). The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(1), 369–382. doi:10.1121/1.400674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J., Beckman, M. E., & Munson, B. (2004). The interaction between vocabulary size and phonotactic probability effects on children’s production accuracy and fluency in nonword repetition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 421–436. doi:10.1044/10924388.2004.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, N. H., Griffiths, T. L., Goldwater, S., & Morgan, J. L. (2013). A role for the developing lexicon in phonetic category acquisition. Psychological Review, 120, 751–778. doi:10.1037/a0034245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, N. H., Myers, E. B., White, K. S., Griffiths, T. L., & Morgan, J. L. (2013). Word-level information influences phonetic learning in adults and infants. Cognition, 127(3), 427–438. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fikkert, P. (1994). On the acquisition of prosodic structure. Leiden, The Netherlands: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Fujisaki, H., Nakamura, K., & Imoto, T. (1975). Auditory perception of duration of speech and non-speech stimuli. In G. Fant & M. Tatham (Eds.), Auditory analysis and perception of speech (pp. 197–219). London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalvo, X., Tazari, S., Chan, C.-A., Becker, M., Gutkin, A., & Silen, H. (2016). Recent advances in Google real-time HMM-driven unit selection synthesizer. In Interspeech (pp. 2238–2242), San Francisco, US.
   Google Scholar
• Goudbeek, M., Smits, R., & Swingley, D. (2009). Supervised and unsupervised learning of multidimensional auditory categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1913–1933. doi:10.1037/a0015781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallé, P. A., & de Boysson-Bardies, B. (1994). Emergence of an early receptive lexicon: Infants’ recognition of words. Infant Behavior and Development, 17, 119–129. doi:10.1016/0163-6383(94)90047-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, S. (2003). Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. Journal of Phonetics, 31(3–4), 373–405. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2003.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, J., Pierrehumbert, J., & Beckman, M. (2004). Speech perception, well-formedness, and the statistics of the lexicon. Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI, 58–74.
   Google Scholar
• Henter, G. E., Ronanki, S., Watts, O., Wester, M., Wu, Z., & King, S. (2016). Robust TTS duration modelling using DNNs. Acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), 2016 IEEE international conference on (pp. 5130–5134). Editor: Yan Sun. Shanghai, China. doi:10.1109/ICASSP.2016.7472655
   Google Scholar
• Hillenbrand, J., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3099–3111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillenbrand, J. M., Clark, M. J., & Houde, R. A. (2000). Some effects of duration on vowel recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 3013–3022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Keith. (2003). Massive reduction in conversational American English. Proceedings of the Workshop on Spontaneous Speech: Data and Analysis. August, 2002. Tokyo, JP.
   Google Scholar
• Kamper, H., Jansen, A., & Goldwater, S. (2016). Unsupervised word segmentation and lexicon discovery using acoustic word embeddings. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing (TASLP), 24(4), 669–679. doi:10.1109/TASLP.2016.2517567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatt, D. H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 1208–1221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatt, D. H. (1987). Review of text-to-speech conversion for English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 737–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, E.-S., Soderstrom, M., & Morgan, J. (2009). Development of perceptual sensitivity to extrinsic vowel duration in infants learning american english. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(5), EL134–EL139. doi:10.1121/1.3239465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, C. (1994). On the acquisition of place. Leiden, The Netherlands: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, Z.-H., Kang, S.-Y., Zen, H., Senior, A., Schuster, M., Qian, X.-J., … Deng, L. (2015). Deep learning for acoustic modeling in parametric speech generation: A systematic review of existing techniques and future trends. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 32(3), 35–52. doi:10.1109/MSP.2014.2359987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., & Kager, R. (2016). Perception of a native vowel contrast by dutch monolingual and bilingual infants: A bilingual perceptual lead. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20(3), 335–345. doi:10.1177/1367006914566082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maye, J., Gerken, L. A., & Werker, J. F. (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82, B101–B111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugitani, R., Pons, F., Dietrich, C., Werker, J. F., & Amano, S. (2009). Perception of vowel length by Japanese- and English-learning infants. Developmental Psychology, 45, 236–247. doi:10.1037/a0014043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, S. G., & Doodeman, G. J. N. (1980). Production and perception of vowel length in spoken sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 276–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, A. S., & Glass, J. R. (2008). Unsupervised pattern discovery in speech. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 16, 186–197. doi:10.1109/TASL.2007.909282
   Google Scholar
• Peperkamp, S., Le Calvez, R., Nadal, J.-P., & Dupoux, E. (2006). The acquisition of allophonic rules: Statistical learning with linguistic constraints. Cognition, 101, B31–B41. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt, M. A., Dilley, L., Johnson, K., Kiesling, S., Raymond, W., Hume, E., & Fosler-Lussier, E. (2007). Buckeye corpus of conversational speech (2nd release). Columbus, OH: Department of Psychology, Ohio State University (Distributor).
   Google Scholar
• Polka, L., & Werker, J. F. (1994). Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 421–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramon-Casas, M., Swingley, D., Bosch, L., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2009). Vowel categorization during word recognition in bilingual toddlers. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 96–121. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, Y., Sogabe, Y., & Mazuka, R. (2010). Discrimination of phonemic vowel length by japanese infants. Developmental Psychology, 46, 106. doi:10.1037/a0016718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, R., Werker, J. F., & Morgan, J. L. (1999). Newborn infantsIJôòù sensitivity to perceptual cues to lexical and grammatical words. Cognition, 72(2), B11–B21. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00047-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stager, C. L., & Werker, J. F. (1997). Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks. Nature, 388, 381–382. doi:10.1038/41102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swingley, D. (2009). Contributions of infant word learning to language development. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 3617–3622. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swingley, D., & Alarcon, C. (2018). Lexical learning may contribute to phonetic learning in infants: A corpus analysis of maternal Spanish. Cognitive Science, 42, 1618–1641. doi:10.1111/cogs.12620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swingley, D., & Aslin, R. N. (2000). Spoken word recognition and lexical representation in very young children. Cognition, 76, 147–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiessen, E. D. (2007). The effect of distributional information on children’s use of phonemic contrasts. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 16–34. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiessen, E. D., & Yee, M. N. (2010). Dogs, bogs, labs, and lads: What phonemic generalizations indicate about the nature of childrenIJôòùs early word-form representations. Child Development, 81(4), 1287–1303. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01468.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillman, G., Benders, T., Brown, S. D., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2017). An evidence accumulation model of acoustic cue weighting in vowel perception. Journal of Phonetics, 61, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2016.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Feest, S. V. H., & Swingley, D. (2011). Dutch and English listeners’ interpretation of vowel duration. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(3), EL57–EL63. doi:10.1121/1.3532050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Feest, S. V. H., & Swingley, D. (in press). A crosslinguistic examination of toddlers’ interpretation of vowel duration. Infancy.
   Google Scholar
• van Santen, J. P. H. (1992). Contextual effects on vowel duration. Speech Communication, 11, 513–546. doi:10.1016/0167-6393(92)90027-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance, T. J. (1987). An introduction to Japanese phonology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vihman, M., & Majorano, M. (2017). The role of geminates in infants’ early word production and word-form recognition. Journal of Child Language, 44, 158–184. doi:10.1017/S0305000915000793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, N., & Cutler, A. (2017). Stress effects in vowel perception as a function of language-specific vocabulary patterns. Phonetica, 74, 81–106. doi:10.1159/000447428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werker, J. F., & Curtin, S. (2005). Primir: A developmental model of speech processing. Language Learning and Development, 1, 197–234. doi:10.1080/15475441.2005.9684216
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, H. H., & Werker, J. F. (2009). Learning words’ sounds before learning how words sound: 9-month-old infants use distinct objects as cues to categorize speech information. Cognition, 113, 234–243. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, S. J., Evermann, G., Gales, M. J. F., Hain, T., Kershaw, D., Moore, G., … Woodland, P. C. (2006). The HTK book, version 3.4. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Engineering Department.
   Google Scholar