Enhancing Delivery and Assessment: A Case Study in Module Redesign for Improved Transition Into Higher Education

References

• Asal, Victor, and Elizabeth L. Blake. 2006. “Creating Simulations for Political Science Education.” Journal of Political Science Education Thematic Issue: Simulations in Political Science 2 (1):1–18. doi:10.1080/15512160500484119.
   Google Scholar
• Bergbower, Matthew L. 2017. “When Are Students Ready for Research Methods? A Curriculum Mapping Argument for the Political Science Major.” Journal of Political Science Education 13 (2):200–210. doi:10.1080/15512169.2017.1292917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, David, Ruth Cohen, and Jane Sampson. 2001. Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning From and With Each Other. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Broscheid, Andreas. 2012. “ Team-Based Learning in Political Science Research Methods Courses.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association 2012 Teaching and Learning Conference, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Damron, Danny, and Jonathan Mott. 2005. “Creating an Interactive Classroom: Enhancing Student Engagement and Learning in Political Science Courses.” Journal of Political Science Education 1 (3):367–383. doi:10.1080/15512160500261228.
   Google Scholar
• Deardorff, Michelle D., and Paul J. Folger. 2005. “Assessment That Matters: Integrating the “Chore” of Department-Based Assessment With Real Improvements in Political Science Education.” Journal of Political Science Education 1 (3):277–287. doi:10.1080/15512160500261129.
   Google Scholar
• Dickovick, J. Tyler. 2009. “Methods in the Madness: Integrative Approaches to Methodology in Introductory Comparative Politics.” Journal of Political Science Education 5 (2):138–153. doi:10.1080/15512160902815977.
   Google Scholar
• Elman, Colin, Diana Kapiszewski, and Dessislava Kirilova. 2015. “Learning Through Research: Using Data to Train Undergraduates in Qualitative Methods.” Political Science and Politics 48 (1):39–43. doi:10.1017/s1049096514001577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, Howard R., and Tracey L. Ernst. 2011. “The Promise and Pitfalls of Differentiated Instruction for Undergraduate Political Science Courses: Student and Instructor Impressions of an Unconventional Teaching Strategy.” Journal of Political Science Education 1:39–59. doi:10.1080/15512160590907513.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, Robert W., and Daniel Tagliarina. 2011. “Ditching the Script: Moving Beyond “Automatic Thinking” in Introductory Political Science Courses.” Journal of Political Science Education 7 (4):394–415. doi:10.1080/15512169.2011.615190.
   Google Scholar
• Grennon Brooks, Jacqueline, and Martin G. Brooks. 1999. In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Hosticka, Carl J. 1980. “Teaching Applied Research Methods: The Use of Real Projects.” Teaching Political Science 7 (2):209–218. doi:10.1080/00922013.1980.11000193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jervis, Loretta M., and Les Jervis. 2005. “What Is the Constructivism in Constructive Alignment?” Bioscience Education 6 (1):1–14. doi:10.3108/beej.2005.06000006.
   Google Scholar
• Junisbai, Barbara. 2014. “The Promise and Potential Pitfalls of a “Learning-Centered” Approach to Creative Social Inquiry: Lessons Learned From an Undergraduate Seminar on Authoritarianism Through Literature and Film.” Journal of Political Science Education 10 (3):331–351. doi:10.1080/15512169.2014.922029.
   Google Scholar
• Kift, Sally. 2008. “ First Year Experience and Curriculum Design: Transition Pedagogy as Third Generation FYE, CSU Student Engagement Forum.” September 20, 2010. http://www.csu.edu.au/student/transition/forum/docs/KIFT%20Keynote.pdf (December 19, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Kift, Sally, and K. Karen Nelson. 2005. “Beyond Curriculum Reform: Embedding the Transition Experience.” http://conference.herdsa.org.au/2005/pdf/refereed/paper_294.pdf (December 19, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Latimer, Christopher, and Karen M. Hempson. 2012. “Using Deliberation in the Classroom: A Teaching Pedagogy to Enhance Student Knowledge, Opinion Formation, and Civic Engagement.” Journal of Political Science Education 8 (4):372–388. doi:10.1080/15512169.2012.729447.
   Google Scholar
• Lusk, Adam. 2016. “Metacognitive Strategies in the Introduction to Political Science Classroom.” Journal of Political Science Education 12 (2):141–150. doi:10.1080/15512169.2015.1060888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, Jonathan, and Anne Statham. 2006. “Critical Thinking in Political Science: Evidence From the Introductory Comparative Politics Course.” Journal of Political Science Education 1 (3):323–344. doi:10.1080/15512160500261186.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, Philip H., Kerstin Hamann, and Bruce M. Wilson. 2011. “Learning Through Discussions: Comparing the Benefits of Small-Group and Large-Class Settings.” Journal of Political Science Education 7 (1):48–64. doi:10.1080/15512169.2011.539913.
   Google Scholar
• Powner, Leanne. 2006. “Teaching the Scientific Method in the Active Learning Classroom.” Political Science & Politics 39 (3):521–524. doi:10.1017/s1049096506060756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, Virginia. 1997. Constructivist Teacher Education: Building New Understandings. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Matt, Clare Saunders, Emily Rainsford, and Emma Thompson. 2014. “Improving Research Methods Teaching and Learning in Politics and International Relations: A ‘Reality Show’ Approach.” Politics 34 (1):85–97. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.12020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, John P., Andrea A. DiSessa, and Jeremy Roschelle. 1994. “Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 3 (2):115–163. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1.
   Google Scholar
• Upcraft, M. Lee, John N. Gardner, and Betsy O. Barefoot. 2005. Challenging and Supporting the First Year Student. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Usherwood, Simon. 2015. Simulations in Politics: A Guide to Best Practice. Heslington, UK: The Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Candace C., Debra K. Cartwright, and Michael Rudy. 2014. “To Resist, Acquiesce, or Internalize: Departmental Responsiveness to Demands for Outcomes Assessment.” Journal of Political Science Education 10 (1):3–22. doi:10.1080/15512169.2013.862502.
   Google Scholar