The effect of requesting money with a few coins in one hand: the foot-in-the-hand technique

References

• Andrews, K. R., Carpenter, C. J., Shaw, A. S., & Boster, F. J. (2008). The legitimization of paltry favors effect: A review and meta-analysis. Communication Reports, 21, 59–69. doi:10.1080/08934210802305028.
   Google Scholar
• Beaman, A. L., Cole, M. C., Preston, M., Klentz, B., & Steblay, N. (1983). Fifteen years of foot-in-the door research: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 181–196. doi:10.1177/0146167283092002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, J. M. (1999). The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: A multiple-process analysis and review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 303–325. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burger, J. M., Hornisher, J., Martin, V. E., Newman, G., & Pringle, S. (2007). The pique technique: Overcoming mindlessness or shifting heuristics? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 2086–2096. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00252.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, J. M., Messian, N., Patel, S., del Prado, A., & Anderson, C. (2004). What a coincidence! The effects of incidental similarity on compliance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 35–43. doi:10.1177/0146167203258838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. J. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the But you are free compliance-gaining technique. Communication Studies, 64, 6–17. doi:10.1080/10510974.2012.727941.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. J. (2014). Making compliance seem more important: The just-one-more technique of gaining compliance. Communication Research Reports, 31, 163–170. doi:10.1080/08824096.2014.907144.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. (2008). Influence: Science and practice. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Cacioppo, J. T., Bassett, R., & Miller, J. A. (1978). Low-ball procedure for producing compliance: Commitment then cost. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 463–476. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.5.463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., & Schroeder, D. A. (1976). Increasing compliance by legitimizing paltry contributions: When even a penny helps. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 599–604. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.4.599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Vincent, J. E., Lewis, S. K., Catalan, J., Wheeler, D., & Darby, B. L. (1975). Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The door-in-the-face technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 206–215. doi:10.1037/h0076284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Hunter, J. E., & Burgoon, M. (1984). Sequential-request persuasive strategies. Human Communication Research, 10, 461–488. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00028.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunyon, J., Gossling, V., Willden, S., & Seiter, J. S. (2010). Compliments and purchasing behavior in telephone sales interactions 1. Psychological Reports, 106, 27–30. doi:10.2466/PR0.106.1.27-30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeley, T. H., Anker, A. E., & Aloe, A. (2012). The door-in-the-face persuasive message strategy: A meta-analysis of the first 35 years. Communication Monographs, 79, 316–343. doi:10.1080/03637751.2012.697631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fern, E., Monroe, K., & Avila, R. (1986). Effectiveness of multiple request strategies: A synthesis of research results. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 64–80.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, J. L., & Fraser, S. C. (1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 195–202. doi:10.1037/h0023552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guéguen, N. (2011). Psychologie de la manipulation et de la soumission [The psychology of manipulation and obedience]. Paris: Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Guéguen, N., Joule, R. V., Fischer-Lokou, J., Halimi, S., Dufourcq-Brana, M., & Pascual, A. (2013). I'm free but I'll comply with your request: Generalization and multidimensional effects of the Evoking freedom technique. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 116–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M. B. (1972). The effects of performing one altruistic act on the likelihood of performing another. The Journal of Social Psychology, 88, 65–73. doi:10.1080/00224545.1972.9922544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvitz, T., & Pratkanis, A. R. (2002). A laboratory demonstration of the fraudulent telemarketers' 1-in-5 prize tactic. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 310–317. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00217.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D. J. (1990). The influence of verbal responses to common greetings on compliance behavior: The foot-in-the-mouth effect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1185–1196. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00399.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, C. L. (1932). The goal-gradient hypothesis and maze learning. Psychological Review, 39, 25–43. doi:10.1037/h0072640.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, C. L. (1934). The rat's speed-of-locomotion gradient in the approach to food. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 17, 393–422. doi:10.1037/h0071299.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. D., King, A. J., & Carcioppolo, N. (2013). Driving toward a goal and the goal-gradient hypothesis: The impact of goal proximity on compliance rate, donation size, and fatigue. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 1881–1895. doi:10.1111/jasp.12152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joule, R. -V., Gouilloux, F., & Weber, F. (1989). The lure: A new compliance procedure. The Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 741–749. doi:10.1080/00224545.1989.9712082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivetz, R., Urminsky, O., & Zheng, Y. (2006). The goal-gradient hypothesis resurrected: Purchase acceleration, illusionary goal progress, and customer retention. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 39–58. doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.1.39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinke, C. (1977). Compliance to requests made by gazing and touching experimenters in field settings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 218–223. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90044-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinke, C. (1980). Interaction between gaze and legitimacy of request on compliance in a field setting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5, 3–12. doi:10.1007/BF00987050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, E., Blank, A., & Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 36, 635–642. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.6.635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual, A., & Guéguen, N. (2005). Foot-in-the-door and door-in-the-face: A comparative meta-analytic study 1. Psychological Reports, 96, 122–128. doi:10.2466/pr0.96.1.122-128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratkanis, A. R. (2007). The science of social influence. New York, NY: Psychological Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reingen, P. H. (1982). Test of a list procedure for inducing compliance with a request to donate money. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 110–118. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.1.110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, M. D., Leve, C., & Pratkanis, A. R. (1994). Hey buddy, can you spare seventeen cents? Mindful persuasion and the pique technique1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 755–764. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00610.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Baaren, R. B., Holland, R. W., Kawakami, K., & Van Knippenberg, A. (2004). Mimicry and prosocial behavior. Psychological Science, 15, 71–74. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01501012.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar