You are either for us or against us: When are ambivalent in-group members sanctioned?

References

• Abrams, D., Randsley de Moura, G. R., Marques, J. M., & Hutchison, P. (2008). Innovation credit: When can leaders oppose their group's norms? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 662–678. 10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvaro, E. M., & Crano, W. D. (1997). Indirect minority influence: Evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counterargumentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 949–964. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asch, S. E., & Zukier, H. (1984). Thinking about persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1230–1240. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bègue, L. (2001). Social judgment of abortion: A black-sheep effect in a Catholic sheepfold. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 640–649. doi:10.1080/00224540109600577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, M., Povey, R., Sparks, P., James, R., & Shepherd, R. (2003). Moderating role of attitudinal ambivalence within the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 75–94. doi:10.1348/014466603763276135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crano, W. D. (1995). Attitude strength and vested interest. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (Vol. 4, pp. 131–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Crano, W. D., & Hemovich, V. (2011). Intergroup relations and majority or minority group influence. In R. M. Kramer, E. Castano, & G. Leonardelli (Eds.), Social cognition, social identity, and intergroup relations: A festschrift in honor of Marilynn Brewer (pp. 221–246). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crano, W. D., & Seyranian, V. (2009). How minorities prevail: The context/comparison-leniency contract model. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 335–363. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01603.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump, M. J. C., McDonnell, J. V., & Gureckis, T. M. (2013). Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. Public Library of Science ONE, 8, 1–18. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057410.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 223–255. doi:10.1080/14792772043000040.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A. (2007). Uncertainty-identity theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 69–126. 0-12-015239-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A. (2012). Uncertainty-identity theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 62–80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., Sherman, D., Dierselhuis, J., Maitner, A., & Moffitt, G. (2007). Uncertainty, entitativity, and group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 135–142. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., van Knippenberg, D., & Rast, III, D. E. (2012). The social identity theory of leadership: Theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments. European Review of Social Psychology, 23, 258–304. doi:10.1080/10463283.2012.741134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohman, Z., Crano, W. D., Siegel, J. T., & Alvaro, E. M. (2014). Attitude ambivalence, friend norms, and adolescent drug use. Prevention Science, 15, 65–74. doi:10.1007/s11121-013-0368-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, I., Siegel, J. T., & Crano, W. D. (2014). Expanding the reach of vested interest in predicting attitude-consistent behavior. Social Influence, 9, 20–36. doi:10.1080/15534510.2012.738243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, E. D., Lowery, B. S., & Schaumberg, R. L. (2010). Racial prejudice predicts opposition to Obama and his health care reform plan. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 420–423. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman, B., & Crano, W. D. (2002). The pervasive effects of vested interest on attitude-criterion consistency in political judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 101–112. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes, L. L. (1987). Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk. Advances in Experimental Psychology, 20, 255–295. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60416-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., Paez, D., & Martinez-Taboada, C. (1998). The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 976–988, .10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., & Serôdio, R. G. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 436–447. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.3.436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., & Páez, D. (1994). The ‘black sheep effect’: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 37–68. doi:10.1080/14792779543000011.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J. P. (1988). The black sheep effect: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(1), 1–16. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocelli, J. V., Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2007). Unpacking attitude certainty: Attitude clarity and attitude correctness. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 92, 30–41. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1996). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, I. R., Marques, J. M., Levine, J. M., & Abrams, D. (2010). Membership status and subjective group dynamics: who triggers the black sheep effect? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 107–119. doi:10.1037/a0018187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosnow, R. L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and correlations in effect-size estimation. Psychological Science, 11, 446–453. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivacek, J., & Crano, W. D. (1982). Vested interest as a moderator of attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 210–221. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538–553. doi:10.1177/0146167297235009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suls, J., & Wheeler, L. (2012). Social comparison theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 460–482). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, B., & Tizard, H. J. (2010). “Not in my back yard”: Evidence for arousal moderating vested interest and oppositional behavior to proposed change. Social Psychology, 41, 255–262. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tropp, L. R., & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585–600, .10.1177/0146167201275007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar