Realizing powerful writing pedagogy in U.S. public schools

References

• Adams, M. (2016). Pedagogical foundations for social justice education. In M. Adams & L. A. Bell (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (pp. 27–53). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, P. (2016, March). How does America solve unauthorized immigration? The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/03/united-states-unauthorized-immigration/472626/
   Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D. (2009). Sociocultural constructions of adolescence and young people’s literacies. In L. Christenbury, R. Bomer, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent literacy research (pp. 14–28). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2003). The effects of high-stakes testing on student motivation and learning. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 32–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (2013). Can education change society? New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (2011). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools. English Journal, 100(6), 14–27.
   Google Scholar
• Au, W., & Gourd, K. (2013). Asinine assessment: Why high-stakes testing is bad for everyone, including English teachers. English Journal, 103(1), 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, R. S. (2001). Paradoxes of desegregation. Race, class, and education, 1935–1975. American Journal of Education, 109(3), 320–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The dialogic imagination: Four essays. M. Holquist Ed. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.).
   Google Scholar
• Ball, A. F., & Ellis, P. (2008). Identity and the writing of culturally and linguistically diverse students. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 499–513). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Behizadeh, N. (2014–2015). Xavier’s take on authentic writing: Structuring choices for expression and impact. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 58(4), 289–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behizadeh, N. (2014a). Adolescent perspectives on authentic writing. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 10(1), 27–44. Retrieved from http://jolle.coe.uga.edu
   Google Scholar
• Behizadeh, N. (2014b). Mitigating the dangers of a single story: Creating large-scale writing assessments aligned with sociocultural theory. Educational Researcher, 43(3), 125–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behizadeh, N., Gordon, C., Thomas, C., Marks, B., Oliver, L., & Goodwin, H. (2019). Social justice beliefs and curricular freedom: Factors supporting critical composition pedagogy in a U.S. middle school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 58–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behizadeh, N., & Lynch, T. L. (2017). Righting technologies: How large-scale assessment can foster a more equitable education system. Berkeley Review of Education, 7(1), 25–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behizadeh, N., & Pang, M. E. (2016). Awaiting a new wave: The status of state writing assessment in the United States. Assessing Writing, 29, 25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, H. B. (2016). Subversive acts of revision: Writing and justice. English Journal, 102(6), 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Cadiero-Kaplan, K. (2002). Literacies ideologies: Critically engaging the language arts curriculum. Language Arts, 79(5), 372–381.
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, L., Hohne, K. B., & Taranto, A. (2014). The art of argument: Research-based essays. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Carbonaro, W. J., & Gamoran, A. (2002). The production of achievement inequality in high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 801–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. (2017). Reading, writing, and rising up: Teaching about social justice and the power of the written word (2nd ed.). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2017). About the standards. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crespo, S. M. (2003). Using math pen-pal letters to promote mathematical communication. Teaching Children Mathematics, 10(1), 34. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/748300
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, M. (2018, October). Major climate report describes a strong risk of crisis as early as 2040. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/07/climate/ipcc-climate-report-2040.html
   Google Scholar
• Delpit, L. (1988). Skills and other dilemmas of a progressive Black educator. Harvard Educational Review, 56(4), 379–385.
   Google Scholar
• Desler, G. (2009). Change writers: Bridging gaps and divides. Voices from the Middle, 17(2), 49–51.
   Google Scholar
• Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed., pp. 208–227). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970–2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum. (Original work published 1970).
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J., & Graham, S. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in grades 4 to 6: A national survey. Elementary School Journal, 110, 494–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A., Graham, S., Kiuhara, S., & Hebert, M. (2014). High school teachers use of writing to support students’ learning: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 27(6), 1043–1072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Bruch, J., Fitzgerald, J., Friedrich, L. D., Furgeson, J., Greene, K., … Smither Wulsin, C. (2016). Teaching secondary students to write effectively (NCEE 2017-4002). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://whatworks.ed.gov
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Santangelo, T. (2015). Research-based writing practices and the common core: Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 498–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., MacArthur, C. A., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.). (2013). Best practices in writing instruction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Towards a pedagogy for social justice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K., Graham, S., Mason, L., & Friedlander, B. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Baltimore, MD: Brooks.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E., & McAvoy, P. (2015). The political classroom: Evidence and ethics in democratic education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hillocks, G. (2002). The testing trap: How state writing assessments control learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ife, F. (2012). Powerful writing: Promoting a political writing community of students. English Journal, 101((4)), 64–69.
   Google Scholar
• Inoue, A. B., & Poe, M. (2012). Introduction. In A. B. Inoue & M. Poe (Eds.), Race and writing assessment (pp. 1–11). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanic, R. (2004). Discourses of writing and learning to write. Language and Education, 18(3), 220–245.
   Google Scholar
• Janks, H. (2012). The importance of critical literacy. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 11(1), 150–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, I., & Assor, A. (2007). When choice motivates and when it does not. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 429–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkland, D. (2016, July). In the end, love will win, but we will need an education first. New York Slant. Retrieved from http://nyslant.com/article/opinion/in-the-end,-love-will-win,-but-we-will-need-an-education-first.html
   Google Scholar
• Kiuhara, S., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. S. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 136–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (2012). Dialect diversity in America: The politics of language change. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lalik, R, & Oliver, K. L. (2007). Differences and tensions in implementing a pedagogy of critical literacy with adolescent girls. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 46-70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewison, M., Flint, A. S., & Van Sluys, K. (2002). Taking on critical literacy: The journey of newcomers and novices. Language Arts, 79(5), 382–392.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A., Woods, A., & Weir, K. (2013). Curriculum design, equity and the technical form of the curriculum. In A. Luke, A. Woods, & K. Weir (Eds.), Curriculum, syllabus design, and equity: A primer and model (pp. 6–39). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (2014). Defining critical literacy. In J. Z. Pandya & J. Ávila (Eds.), Moving critical literacies forward: A new look at praxis across contexts (pp. 19–31). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthey, S. J. (2008). The impact of No Child Left Behind on teachers’ writing instruction. Written Communication, 25, 462–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthey, S. J., Woodard, R., & Kang, G. (2014). Elementary teachers negotiating discourses in writing instruction. Written Communication, 31(1), 58–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrail, E., & Behizadeh, N. (2016). Multimodal K-12 assessment frameworks and the interactive audience: An exploratory analysis of existing frameworks. Assessing Writing, 31, 24–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWhorter, J. (2000). Spreading the word: Language and dialect in America. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, H. R. (2015). Rac(e)ing to class: Confronting poverty and race in schools and classrooms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrop, H., & Sunderman, G. L. (2009). Predictable failure of federal sanctions-driven accountability for school improvement: And why we may retain it anyway. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 353–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B., Luke, A., Davies, B., & Street, B. (2009). Literacy and identity: Examining the metaphors in history and contemporary research. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 415–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
   Google Scholar
• Morrell, E. (2003,March). Writing the word and the world: Critical literacy as critical textual production. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED475208.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morrell, E. (2008). Critical literacy and urban youth: Pedagogies of access, dissent, and liberation. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Muhammad, G. E. (2015a). Iqra: African American Muslim girls reading and writing for social change. Written Communication, 32(3), 286–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammad, G. E. (2015b). In search for a full vision: Writing representations of African American adolescent girls. Research in the Teaching of English, 49(3), 224–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammad, G. E. (2018). A plea for identity and criticality: Reframing literacy learning standards through a four-layered equity model. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 62(2), 137–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., Marks, H. M., & Gamoran, A. (1996). Authentic pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104(4), 280–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilley, M. R. (1993). The peaceable classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, C. B., Matuchniak, T., Chung, H. Q., Stumpf, R., & Farkas, G. (2017). Reducing achievement gaps in academic writing for Latinos and English learners in grades 7–12. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Wynn, S. R. (2010). The effectiveness and relative importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 896–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, P. (2014). Kids for change. ASCD Express: Ideas from the Field, 9(22), 1–3. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/ascd-express/vol9/922-patel.aspx/
   Google Scholar
• Powell, R., Cantrell, S. C., & Adams, S. (2001). Saving Black Mountain: The promise of critical literacy in a multicultural democracy. The Reading Teacher, 54(8), 772–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell-Gates, V., Duke, N. K., & Martineau, J. A. (2007). Learning to read and write genre- specific text: Roles of authentic experience and explicit teaching. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 8–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodesiler, L., & Kelley, B. (2017). Toward a readership of “real” people: A case for authentic writing opportunities. English Journal, 106(6), 22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., & Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, C. (2017, March). The Obamacare debate is not just about healthcare. Aljazeera. Retrieved from http://www.aljazeera.com/blogs/americas/2017/03/obamacare-healthcare-170314035307071.html
   Google Scholar
• Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). What is the ‘dialogical method’ of teaching? Journal of Education, 169(3), 11–31.
   Google Scholar
• Sisserson, K., Manning, C. K., Knepler, A., & Jolliffe, D. A. (2002). Authentic intellectual achievement in writing. The English Journal, 91(6), 63–69.
   Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P., Johannessen, L., Kahn, E. A., & McCann, T. M. (2010). The dynamics of writing instruction: A structures process approach for middle and high school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. (2015). 2014 Wallace Foundation Distinguished Lecture: Rigor and realism: Doing educational science in the real world. Educational Researcher, 44, 460–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solórzano, R. W. (2008). High stakes testing: Issues, implications, and remedies for English language learners. Review of Educational Research, 78(2), 260–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations (n.d.). We can end poverty: Millennium development goals and beyond 2015. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/
   Google Scholar
• Whitney, A. E. (2017). Keeping it real: Valuing authenticity in the writing classroom. English Journal, 106(6), 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, T. (2017). Listening to many voices: Enacting social justice literacy curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 104–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, M. T., & Behizadeh, N. (2011). The right to be literate: Literacy, education, and the school-to-prison pipeline. Review of Research in Education, 35, 147–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, M. T., & Johnson, L. (2011). Writing instruction in the culturally relevant classroom. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, K., Stover, K., & Kissel, B. (2013). Using digital VoiceThreads to promote 21st century learning. Middle School Journal, 44(4), 58–64.
   Google Scholar