Multimodal classroom interaction analysis using video-based methods of the pedagogical tactic of (un)grouping

References

• Bajec, I. L., & Heppner, F. H. (2009). Organized flight in birds. Animal Behaviour, 78(4), 777–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (2004). Conceptualizing the construct of interpersonal conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 15(3), 216–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BERA. (2018). Revised ethical guidelines for education research. British Educational Research Association. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018
   Google Scholar
• Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2011). Grounded theory: A practical guide. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Blatchford, P. (2016). Is it true that class size does not matter. A critical review of research on class size effects (P. Blatchford, K. W. Chan, M. Galton, K. C. Lai & J. C. K. Lee, Eds.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blatchford, P., & Russell, A. (2019). Class size, grouping practices and classroom management. International Journal of Educational Research, 96, 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, T., & Charmaz, K. (2010). The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (2014). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom third edition (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Darden, L. (1991). Theory change in science: Strategies from mendelian genetics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeVries, J. M., Szardenings, C., Doebler, P., & Gebhardt, M. (2020). Individualized assignments, group work and discussions: How they interact with class size, low socioeconomic status, and second language learners. Frontiers in Education, 5, 65. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00065
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. (2006). A history of conceptual change research: Threads and fault lines. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 265–282). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Galton, M., Hargreaves, L., & Pell, T. (2009). Group work and whole‐class teaching with 11‐to 14‐year‐olds compared. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640802701994
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (2008). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson, D. E., & Moore, J. D. (2008). Group learning pedagogy and group selection. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 4(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578770801943893
   Google Scholar
• Hallam, S., Ireson, J., & Davies, J. (2002). Effective pupil grouping in the primary school: A practical guide. David Fulton Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hardman, M., Riordan, J., & Hetherington, L. (2022). A material-dialogic perspective on powerful knowledge and matter within a science classroom. In B. Hudson, M. Stolare, N. Gericke, & C. Olin-Scheller (Eds.), Powerful knowledge and epistemic quality across school subjects (pp. 157–175). Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Hehir, T., Grindal, T., Freeman, B., Lamoreau, R., Borquaye, Y., & Burke, S. (2016). A summary of the evidence on inclusive education. Instituto Alana and Abt Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(4), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (4th ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leighton, J. P. (2017). Using think-aloud interviews and cognitive labs in educational research. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, V. (1997). How we learn mathematical language. The Philosophical Review, 106(1), 35–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2010). The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X479853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, N. C., McKissick, B. R., Ivy, J. T., & Moser, K. (2017). Supporting diverse young adolescents: Cooperative grouping in inclusive middle-level settings. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues & Ideas, 90(3), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2017.1285661
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. L. (2004). The big book of concepts. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riordan, J. P., & Roberts, M. (2021). Technology. In S. Soan (Ed.), Why do teachers need to know about diverse learning needs? Strengthening Professional Identity and Well-Being (pp. 67–84). Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Riordan, J. (2022). A method and framework for video-based pedagogy analysis. Research in Science & Technological Education, 40(1), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1776243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riordan, J. P., Hardman, M., & Cumbers, D. (2021). Pedagogy analysis framework: A video-based tool for combining teacher, pupil and researcher perspectives. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(3), 906–927. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1972960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riordan, J., Revell, L., Bowie, B., Woolley, M., Hulbert, S., & Thomas, C. (2021). Understanding and explaining pedagogical problem solving: A video-based grounded theory study of classroom pedagogy. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.2001450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riordan, J. P., Revell, L., Bowie, B., Thomas, C., Woolley, M., & Hulbert, S. (2023). Using video and Multimodal Classroom Interaction Analysis to investigate how information, misinformation, and disinformation influence pedagogy. Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1163/23644583-bja10040
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, I. (1995). Multiple perspectives in literacy research: Integrating the quantitative and qualitative. Language and Education, 9(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789509541401
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., & Dionne, J. P. (2000). Accessing problem-solving strategy knowledge: The complementary use of concurrent verbal protocols and retrospective debriefing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellington, J. (2012). Searching for ‘doctorateness’. Studies in Higher Education, 38(10), 1490–1503. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.634901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (2008). Is there a need for fuzzy logic? Information Sciences, 178(13), 2751–2779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2008.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A., & Kacprzyk, J. (1992). Fuzzy logic for the management of uncertainty. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar