Principals’ Data-Driven Practice and Its Influences on Teacher Buy-in and Student Achievement in Comprehensive School Reform Models

References

• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Borman, G. D., Gamoran, A., & Bowdon, J. A. (2008). A randomized trial of teacher development in elementary science: First-year achievement effects. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1(4), 237–264. doi:10.1080/19345740802328273
   Google Scholar
• Camburn, E. M. (2010). Embedded teacher learning opportunities as a site for reflective practice: An exploratory study. American Journal of Education, 116(4), 463–489. doi:10.1086/653624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, D., Borman, G. D., & Robinson, M. (2011). A multistate district-level cluster randomized trial of the impact of data-driven reform on reading and mathematics achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 378–398. doi:10.3102/0162373711412765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choppin, J. (2002, April). Data use in practice: Examples from the school level. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., Toure, J., & Yamashita, M. (2009). Evidence, interpretation, and persuasion: Instructional decision making in the district central office. Teachers College Record, 111(4), 1115–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2012). The practice of data use: An introduction. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 99–111. doi:10.1086/663272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creighton, T. B. (2001). Data analysis in administrators’ hands: An oxymoron? School Administrator, 58(4), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., & Castellano, M. (2000). Teachers’ responses to success for all: How beliefs, experiences, and adaptations shape implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 37(3), 775–799. doi:10.3102/00028312037003775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., & Castellano, M. E. (2001). Managing and guiding school reform: Leadership in success for all schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(2), 219–249. doi:10.1177/00131610121969307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. (2002). How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented? Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 433–479. doi:10.3102/00346543072003433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, J., Randolph, A., & Spillane, J. (2004). Teachers’ expectations and sense of responsibility for student learning: The importance of race, class, and organizational habitus. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35(1), 75–98. doi:10.1525/aeq.2004.35.1.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, J., & Spillane, J. (2004). High-stakes accountability in urban elementary schools: Challenging or reproducing inequality? The Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1145–1176. doi:10.1111/tcre.2004.106.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerborn, L., & Chinn, D. (2012). Teacher perceptions of student needs and implications for positive behavior supports. Behavioral Disorders, 37(4), 219–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2000). The return of large-scale reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1(1), 5–27. doi:10.1023/A:1010068703786
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2002). The change. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 16–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1998). What’s worth fighting for out there? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grigg, J., Kelly, K. A., Gamoran, A., & Borman, G. D. (2013). Effects of two scientific inquiry professional development interventions on teaching practice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(1), 37–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., Bickman, L., & Davis, K. (1996). School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 96, 527–549. doi:10.1086/461843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44. doi:10.1177/0013161X96032001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halverson, R. (2010). School formative feedback systems. Peabody Journal of Education, 85(2), 130–146. doi:10.1080/01619561003685270
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, R., Prichett, R., Grigg, J., & Thomas, C. (2005). The new instructional leadership: Creating data-driven instructional systems in schools (WCER working paper no. 2005-9). Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED497014
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, R., Grigg, J., Prichett, R., & Thomas, C. (2007). The new instructional leadership: Creating data-driven instructional systems in schools. Journal of School Leadership, 17(2), 159–193.
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, R., & Thomas, C. N. (2007). The roles and practices of student services staff as data-driven instructional leaders (WCER working paper no. 2007-1). Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED496316.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Herman, J., & Gribbons, B. (2001). Lessons learned in using data to support school inquiry and continuous improvement: Final report to the Stuart Foundation. Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I., & Coburn, C. (2008). Evidence-based decision making in school district central offices: Toward a policy and research agenda. Educational Policy, 22(4), 578–608. doi:10.1177/0895904807307067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, D., Seashore Louis, K., & Schroeder, R. (2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barriers to the use of data to improve practice. The Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1258–1287. doi:10.1111/tcre.2004.106.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes & efficacy. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/professional_dev/1/
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, J. L. (2012). The effects of accountability system design on teachers’ use of test score data. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, K. A., Marsh, J. A., Ikemoto, G. S., Darilek, H., & Barney, H. (2006). Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvement: Actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 496–520. doi:10.1086/505057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingner, J. K., Boardman, A. G., & McMaster, K. L. (2013). What does it take to scale up and sustain evidence-based practices? Exceptional Children, 79, 195–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1999). The relative effects of principal and teacher sources of leadership on student engagement with school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 679–706. doi:10.1177/0013161X99355002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201–227. doi:10.1080/09243450600565829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Steinbach, R., & Jantzi, D. (2002). School leadership and teachers’ motivation to implement accountability policies. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(1), 94–119. doi:10.1177/0013161X02381005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, J. A., & Datnow, A. (2012). The principal role in data-driven decision making: Using case-study data to develop multi-mediator models of educational reform. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(2), 179–201. doi:10.1080/09243453.2011.599394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou, Y. H., Grigg, J., & Halverson, R. (2014). Leadership and the design of data-driven professional networks in schools. International Journal of Educational Leadership & Management, 2(1), 29–73.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. (2012). Understanding data use practice among teachers: The contribution of micro-process studies. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 143–166. doi:10.1086/663271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, R. G., & Hall, R. J. (1992). Contemporary views of leadership and individual differences. The Leadership Quarterly, 3(2), 137–157. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(92)90030-J
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling for high school principals’ data-driven decision making: An analysis of information use environments. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 603–634. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandinach, E., & Jackson, S. S. (2012). Transforming teaching and learning through data-driven decision making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Messelt, J. (2004). Data-driven decision making: A powerful tool for school improvement ( White paper). Minneapolis, MN: Sagebrush Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (1999). The quest for a center: Notes on the state of the profession of educational administration. Columbia, MO: University Council for Educational Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A., & Gray, P. (2006). School leadership and student achievement: The mediating effects of teacher beliefs. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue Canadienne De L’éducation, 29(3), 798–822. doi:10.2307/20054196
   Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., & Kuiper, W. (2010). Data-informed curriculum reform: Which data, what purposes, and promoting and hindering factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 482–496. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silin, J., & Schwartz, F. (2003). Staying close to the teacher. Teachers College Press, 105(8), 1586–1605. doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Holmes, G., Madden, N. A., & Chamberlain, A. (2013). Effects of a data-driven district reform model on state assessment outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 371–396. doi:10.3102/0002831212466909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3–34. doi:10.1080/0022027032000106726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., & Nelson, B. S. (2003). Leadership content knowledge. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 423–448. doi:10.3102/01623737025004423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. S. (1991). Progress in communication science. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Information use environments (pp. 217–254). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J., Meadows, J. G., & Howard, P. (2006). Using student outcome data to help guide professional development and teacher support: Issues for reading first and K–12 reading plans. Tallahassee, FL: FCRR (Florida Center for Reading Research). Retrieved from http://stage.fcrr.org/assessment/pdf/Prof_dev_guided.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, B. (2002). Teacher participation and buy-in: Implications for school reform initiatives. Learning Environments Research, 5(3), 235–252. doi:10.1023/A:1021981622041
   Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158. doi:10.1002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayman, J. C., Spring, S. D., Lemke, M. A., & Lehr, M. D. (2012, April). Using data to inform practice: Effective principal leadership strategies. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlstetter, P., Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2008). Creating a system for data-driven decision-making: Applying the principal-agent framework. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(3), 239–259. doi:10.1080/09243450802246376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, V. M., & Kim, D. H. (2010). Using assessments for instructional improvement: A literature review. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 18(19), 1–38. doi:10.14507/epaa.v18n19.2010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zimmerman, J. (2006). Why some teachers resist change and what principals can do about it. NASSP Bulletin, 90(3), 238–249. doi:10.1177/0192636506291521
   Google Scholar