Data Use as Instructional Reform: Exploring Educators’ Reports of Classroom Practice

References

• Amrein-Beardsley, A., Collins, C., Polasky, S. A., & Sloat, E. F. (2013). Value-added model (VAM) research for educational policy: Framing the issue. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21(4), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., Leithwood, K., & Strauss, T. (2010). Leading data use in schools: Organizational conditions and practices at the school and district levels. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(3), 292–327. doi:10.1080/15700761003731492
   Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267. doi:10.3102/0013189X07306523
   Google Scholar
• Beaver, J. K., & Weinbaum, E. H. (2015). State test data and school improvement efforts. Educational Policy, 29(3), 478–503. doi:10.1177/0895904813510774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London, UK: School of Education, King’s College.
   Google Scholar
• Bracey, G. W. (2006). Testing for growth. Principal, 85(4), 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., Honig, M. I., & Stein, M. K. (2009). What’s the evidence on district’s use of evidence? In J. Bransford, D. J. Stipek, N. J. Vye, L. Gomez, & D. Lam (Eds.), Educational improvement: What makes it happen and why? (pp. 67–86). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., & Russell, J. L. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203–235. doi:10.3102/0162373708321829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2011). Research on data use: A framework and analysis. Measurement, 9(4), 173–206.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2012). The practice of data use: An introduction. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 99–111. doi:10.1086/663272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement. CPRE Research Reports. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports
   Google Scholar
• Cohen-Vogel, L. (2011). Staffing to the test: Are today’s school personnel practices evidence based? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(4), 483–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Vogel, L., & Harrison, C. (2013). Leading with data: Evidence from the National Center on Scaling Up Effective Schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 12(2), 122–145.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen-Vogel, L., Osborne-Lampkin, L., & Houck, E. (2013). New data, old patterns: The role of test scores in student assignment. In D. Anagnostopoulos, S. A. Rutledge, & R. Jacobsen (Eds.), The infrastructure of accountability: Mapping data use and its consequences (pp. 129–134). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen-Vogel, L., & Rutledge, S. (2009). The pushes and pulls of new localism: School-level instructional arrangements, instructional resources, and family community partnerships. In R. Crowson & E. Goldring (Eds.), The new localism in American education: The yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Vol. 108, pp. 70–103). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Copland, M. A., Knapp, M. S., & Swinnerton, J. A. (2009). Principal leadership, data, and school improvement. In T. J. Kowalski & T. J. Lasley II (Eds.), Handbook of data-based decision making in education (pp. 153–172). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Corno, L., & Snow, R. (1986). Adapting teaching to individual differences among learners. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 605–629). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cosner, S. (2012). Leading the ongoing development of collaborative data practices: Advancing a schema for diagnosis and intervention. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(1), 26–65. doi:10.1080/15700763.2011.577926
   Google Scholar
• Council of Great City Schools. (2009). High school reform survey, 2006–2007. Retrieved from http://www.cgcs.org
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., Park, V., & Wohlstetter, P. (2007). Achieving with data: How high-performing school systems use data to improve instruction for elementary students. Los Angeles, CA: Center on Educational Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, G. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118. doi:10.2307/3556620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figlio, D., & Winicki, J. (2002). Food for thought: The effects of school accountability plans on school nutrition. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, W., & González, R. (2007). Culture and processes affecting data use in school districts. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 106, 132–154. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7984.2007.00100.x
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). General educators’ instructional adaptation for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21(1), 23–33. doi:10.2307/1511370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Bishop, N. (1992). Instructional adaptation for students at risk. The Journal of Educational Research, 86(2), 70–84. doi:10.1080/00220671.1992.9941143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, L., Means, B., & Padilla, C. (2008). Teachers’ use of student data systems to improve instruction: 2005 to 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Georgia Department of Education. (2010). Georgia high school graduation requirements. Retrieved from http://www.gsfc.org
   Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. A., Kalogrides, D., & Loeb, S. (2013, March). Strategic staffing: Examining the class assignments of teachers and students in tested and untested grades and subjects. Paper presented at the Association for Education Finance and Policy annual conference, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, R., Grigg, J., Prichett, R., & Thomas, C. (2007). The new instructional leadership: Creating data-driven instructional systems in schools. Journal of School Leadership, 17(2), 158–193.
   Google Scholar
• Henig, J. (2012). The politics of data use. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, G., Thompson, C., & Associates. (2008). Final report of the high school resource allocation study. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Institute for Public Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 24–31. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00151.x
   Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I. (2006). Street-level bureaucracy revisited: Frontline district central-office administrators as boundary spanners in education policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(4), 357–383. doi:10.3102/01623737028004357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I., Copland, M. A., Rainey, L., Lorton, J. A., & Newton, M. (2010). Central office transformation for districtwide teaching and learning improvement. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, I. S., Kane, B. D., & Wilson, J. (2015). Making sense of student performance data: Data use logics and mathematics teachers’ learning opportunities. American Educational Research Journal, 52(2), 208–242. doi:10.3102/0002831215573773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikemoto, G. S., & Marsh, J. A. (2007). Cutting through the “data driven” mantra: Different conceptions of data-driven decision making. In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making (pp. 105–131). Malden, MA: National Society for the Study of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, D., Louis, K., & Schroeder, R. G. (2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barriers to the use of data to improve practice. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1258–1287. doi:10.1111/tcre.2004.106.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimerson, J. B., & Wayman, J. C. (2015). Professional learning for using data: Examining teacher needs and supports. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, S., & Dack, L. A. (2014). Towards a culture of inquiry for data use in schools: Breaking down professional learning barriers through intentional interruption. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 35–40. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, K. A., Marsh, J. A., Ikemoto, G., Darilek, H., & Barney, H. (2006). Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvement: Actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 496–520. doi:10.1086/505057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachat, M. A., & Smith, S. (2005). Practices that support data use in urban high schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(3), 333–349. doi:10.1207/s15327671espr1003_7
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. (2012). Understanding data use practice among teachers: The contribution of micro-process studies. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 143–166. doi:10.1086/663271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, J. W., Gearhart, M., Curry, M., & Kafka, J. (2003). Looking at student work for teacher learning, teacher community, and school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(5), 184–192. doi:10.1177/003172170308500305
   Google Scholar
• Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. E., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Perceptions of the impact of accountability on the role of principals. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(16), 1–19. doi:10.14507/epaa.v14n16.2006
   Google Scholar
• Mandinach, E. B. (2012). A perfect time for data use: Using data-driven decision making to inform practice. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 71–85. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.667064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2013). A systemic view of implementing data literacy in educator preparation. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 30–37. doi:10.3102/0013189X12459803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., Bertrand, M., & Huguet, A. (2015). Using data to alter instructional practice: The mediating role of coaches and professional learning communities. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., & Farrell, C. C. (2015). How leaders can support teachers with data-driven decision making: A framework for understanding capacity building. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(2), 269–289. doi:10.1177/1741143214537229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., Pane, J. F., & Hamilton, L. S. (2006). Making sense of data-driven decision making in education: Evidence from recent RAND research (OP-170). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist, 63(8), 760–769. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall, D., Saunders, W., & Goldenberg, C. (2007). Inside the black box of school reform: Explaining the how and why of change at Getting Results schools. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 54(1), 51–89. doi:10.1080/10349120601149755
   Google Scholar
• Means, B., Chen, E., DeBarger, A., & Padilla, C. (2011). Teachers’ ability to use data to inform instruction: Challenges and supports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Means, B., Padilla, C., DeBarger, A., & Bakia, M. (2009). Implementing data-informed decision making in schools: Teacher access, supports and use. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Means, B., Padilla, C., & Gallagher, L. (2010). Use of education data at the local level: From accountability to instructional improvement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. H. (1997). Value‐added indicators of school performance: A primer. Economics of Education Review, 16(3), 283–301. doi:10.1016/S0272-7757(96)00081-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midkiff, B., & Cohen-Vogel, L. (2015). Understanding local instructional responses to federal and state accountability mandates: A typology of extended learning time. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(1), 9–26.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nomi, T., & Allensworth, E. (2009). “Double-dose” algebra as an alternative strategy to remediation: Effects on students’ academic outcomes. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(2), 111–148. doi:10.1080/19345740802676739
   Google Scholar
• Oláh, L. N., Lawrence, N. R., & Riggan, M. (2010). Learning to learn from benchmark assessment data: How teachers analyze results. Peabody Journal of Education, 85(2), 226–245. doi:10.1080/01619561003688688
   Google Scholar
• Osborne-Lampkin, L., & Cohen-Vogel, L. (2014). “Spreading the wealth”: How principals use performance data to populate classrooms. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(2), 188–208.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Roderick, M. (2012). Drowning in data but thirsty for analysis. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sass, T. (2012). Selecting high and low-performing high schools in Broward County, Florida for analysis and treatment (Technical report). Vanderbilt, TN: The National Center on Scaling Up Effective Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Sherer, J. Z., & Spillane, J. P. (2011). Constancy and change in work practice in schools: The role of organizational routines. Teachers College Record, 113(3), 611–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2012). Data in practice: Conceptualizing the data-based decision-making phenomena. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 113–141. doi:10.1086/663283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. A., & Klein, V. (2003). Mapping a course for improved student learning: How innovative schools use student performance data to guide improvement. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Thorn, C., Meyer, R. H., & Gamoran, A. (2007). Evidence and decision making. In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making (pp. 340–361). Malden, MA: National Society for the Study of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Thorn, C. A. (2001). Knowledge management for educational information systems: What is the state of the field? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(47), 47. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. (2009). Evidence-informed conversations making a difference to student achievement. In L. M. Earl & H. Timperley (Eds.), Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using evidence for improvement (pp. 69–80). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wayman, J. C., Conoly, K., Gasko, J., & Stringfield, S. (2008). Supporting equity inquiry with student data computer systems. In E. B. Mandinach, & M. Honey (Eds.), Linking data and learning (pp. 171–190). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wayman, J. C., & Jimerson, J. B. (2014). Teacher needs for data-related professional learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 25–34. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlstetter, P., Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2008). Creating a system for data-driven decision-making: Applying the principal-agent framework. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(3), 239–259. doi:10.1080/09243450802246376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, V. (2008). Supporting teachers’ use of data: The role of organization and policy. In E. B. Mandinach, & M. Honey (Eds.), Data-driven school improvement: Linking data and learning (pp. 87–106). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar