A Comparative Study of the Professional Identity of Two Secondary School Principals in Disadvantaged Contexts

References

• Adler, P., & Adler, P. (1994). Observational techniques. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 377–392). London, UK: Sage. -205
   Google Scholar
• AGAEVEa (Andalusian Agency for Educational Evaluation). (2011-2012). Homologated indicators for the self-evaluation of schools. Results of the report School A. Sevilla. Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports. Junta de Andalucía.
   Google Scholar
• AGAEVEa (Andalusian Agency for Educational Evaluation). (2014-2015). Homologated indicators for the self-evaluation of schools. Results of the report School A. Sevilla. Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports. Junta de Andalucía.
   Google Scholar
• AGAEVEb (Andalusian Agency for Educational Evaluation). (2011-2012). Homologated indicators for the self-evaluation of schools. Results of the report School A. Sevilla. Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports. Junta de Andalucía.
   Google Scholar
• AGAEVEb (Andalusian Agency for Educational Evaluation). (2014-2015). Homologated indicators for the self-evaluation of schools. Results of the report School A. Sevilla. Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports. Junta de Andalucía.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1998). Simbolic interactionis. United States of America: University California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative Research in Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. United States of America: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bredeson, P., & Johansson, O. (2000). The school principal’s role in teacher professional development. Journal of In-Service Education, 26(2), 385–401. doi:10.1080/13674580000200114
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, J., Jean-Marie, G., Normore, A., & Hodgins, D. (2007). Distributed leadership for social justice: Exploring how influence and equity are stretched over an urban high school. Journal of School Leadership, 17(4), 225–246.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. (2008). Perparing future leaders for social justice, equity, and excellence: Bridging theory and practice through a trsnsformative androgogy. USA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers-Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, P. (2006). Identity change. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(1), 81–96. doi:10.1177/019027250606900106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, P., & Stets, J. (2009). Identity theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capper, C. A., Theoharis, G., & Sebastian, J. (2006). Toward a framework for preparing educational leaders for social justice. International Journal of Educational Administration, 44(3), 209–224. doi:10.1108/09578230610664814
   Google Scholar
• Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1988). Teoría crítica de la enseñanza. España: Martínez Roca.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C., & Harris, A. (2004). Strategies for school improvemet in school facing challenging circunstances. Educational Research, 46(3), 119–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies for qualitative inquiry (pp. 249–291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2013). Grounded theory methods in social justice research. In N. Denzin & Y. Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 291–336). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. (2009). Performing cultural work in demographically changing schools: Implications for expanding transformative leadership frameworks. Educational Admininstration Quarterly, 45(5), 694–724. doi:10.1177/0013161X09341639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, G., Day, C., & Moller, J. (2017). Framing research on school principals’ identities. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(3), 265–277. doi:10.1080/13603124.2015.1123299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, G., & Moller, J. (2017). Professional identities of school leaders across interaional contexts: An introduction and rationale. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 45(5), 749–758. doi:10.1177/1741143217714485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dantley, M. (2008). The 2007 Willower family lecture reconstructing leadership: Embrancing a spiritual dimension. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7(4), 451–460. doi:10.1080/15700760802247411
   Google Scholar
• Day, C. (2007). Sustaining success in challenging contexts: Leadership in english schools. In C. Day & K. Leithwood (Eds.), Successful principal leadership in times of change (pp. 59–70). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C. (2011). Uncertain profesional identities: Managing the emotional contexts of teaching. New understanding of teacher’s work: emotions and educational change (pp. 45–64). Dordecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C. (2013). Conducting research on school principals: ISSPP members guide. Nottingham: International Successful School Principals’ Project (ISSPP).
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., & Gurr, D. (Eds.). (2014). Leading school successfully. Stories from the field. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Harris, A., & Hadfield, M. (2001). Challenging the orthodoxy of effective school leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(1), 39–56. doi:10.1080/13603120117505
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., & Lee, J. (2011). New understanding of teacher’s work: Emotions and educational change. Dordecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., & Leithwood, K. (Eds.). (2007). Successful school leadership in times of change. Dordrecht: Springer-Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Sammons, P., Leithwood, K., Hopkins, D., Gu, Q., Brown, E., & Ahtaridou, E. (2011). Successful school leadership. Linking with learning and achievement. London: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Sammons, P., Leithwood, K., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Gu, Q., & Brow, E. (2010). Ten strong claims about successful school leadership. Nottingham: The National College for School Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Day, D., Elliot, B., & Kington, A. (2005). Reform, standars and teacher identity: Challenges of sustining commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 563–577. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2013). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Eds). Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp.1–42). Los Angeles. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2001). Interpretative interactionism. United States of America: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2011). The politics of evidence. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 645–658). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ellingson, L. L. (2011). Analysis and representation across the continuum. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 595–610). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361–376). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Furman, G. (2012). Social justice leadership as praxis: Developing capacities through preparation programs. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(2), 191–229. doi:10.1177/0013161X11427394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman, G., & Gruenewald, D. (2004). Expanding the landscape of social justice. A critical ecological analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 49–78. doi:10.1177/0013161X03259142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univesity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorham, M., Finn-Stevenson, M., & Lapin, B. (2008). Enriching school leadership through coaching. School of the 21st Century. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. (2008). The future of distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 141–158. doi:10.1108/09578230810863235
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–351. doi:10.1080/0305764032000122005
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2009). Leadership for 21st century schools. From instructional leadership to leadership for learning. Hon Kong: The Hon Kong Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lesson for 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142. doi:10.1108/09578231111116699
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (2010). Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference in school improvement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(6), 654–678. doi:10.1177/1741143210379060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2010a). Improving schools in challenging contexts. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 693–706). Dordrecht Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2014). Distributed leadership matters. California, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, R., & Hallinger, H. (2010). Collaborative leadership effects on school improvement: Integrating unidirectional- and reciprocal-effects models. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2), 226–252. doi:10.1086/656299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heifetz, R., Grashow, A., & Lynsky, M. (2009). Leadership in a (permanent) crisis. Harvard Business Review, 87(7–8), 62–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. (2006). Leading against the grain: The politics and emotions of leading for social justice in South Africa. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(1), 37–51. doi:10.1080/15700760500484027
   Google Scholar
• Jean-Marie, G. (2008). Leadership for social justice: An agenda for 21st century schools. The Educational Forum, 72, 340–354. doi:10.1080/0013172002362058
   Google Scholar
• Katovich, M., Miller, D., & Stewart, R. (2003). The Iowa school. In L. Reynols & N. Hermnan-Kinney (Eds.), Handbook of simbolic interactionism (pp. 119–140). United States of America: Altamira.
   Google Scholar
• Kelchtermans, G. (1993). Getting the story, understanding the lives: From career stories to teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(5–6), 443–456. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(93)90029-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, M. (2014). The evolution of learning-focused leadership in scholarship and practice. In M. Knapp, M. Honing, M. Plecky, B. Portin, & M. Copland (Eds.), Learning-focused leadership in action (pp. 23–51). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, M., & Portin, B. (2014). Team-based leadership of instructional improvement in demanding school contexts. In M. Knapp, M. Honing, M. Plecky, B. Portin, & M. Copland (Eds.), Learning-focused leadership in action (pp. 52–78). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kose, B. (2007). Principal leadership for social justice: Uncovering the content of teacher professional development. Journal of School Leadership, 17(3), 276–312.
   Google Scholar
• Lalas, J., & Morgan, R. (2006). Training school leaders who will promote educational justice: What, why and how? Educational Leadership and Administration, 18(2), 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G. (1989). Math lessons: A contrast of novice and expert competence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 52–75. doi:10.2307/749098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2006). Successful school leadership. What is it and how it influences pupil learning (Research Report n. 800). Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Hopkins, D., & Harris, A. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28, 27–42. doi:10.1080/13632430701800060
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 97–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, R. (2003). Secondary school in disadvantaged areas. London: Thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, H., & Printy, S. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397. doi: 10.1177/0013161X03253412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, G. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, B., Garza, E., & Murakami-Ramalho, E. (2014). USA – Culturally responsive leadership. In C. Day & D. Gurr (Eds.), Leading school successfully. Stories from the field (pp. 174–183). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Minor-Ragan, Y., & Jacobson, S. (2014). USA – Her own words: Turning around an under-performing school. In C. Day & D. Gurr (Eds.), Leading school successfully. Stories from the field (pp. 9–18). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moller, J., & Vedoy, G. (2014). Norway – leadership for social justice: Educating students as active citizens in a democratic society. In C. Day & D. Gurr (Eds.), Leading school successfully. Stories from the field (pp. 163–173). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moral, C., & Martín-Romera, A., Martínez-Valdivia, E., & Olmo, M. (2018). Successful Secondary School Principalship in Disadvantage Context Form a Leadership for Learning Perspective. School Leadership and Management, 38 (1), 32–52. doi:10.1080/13632434.2017.1358161
   Google Scholar
• Moral, C., Higueras-Rodríguez, L., Martín-Romera, Martínez-Valdivia, E. and Morales-Ocaña, A. (Forthcoming). Effective practices in leadership for social justice. Evolution of successful secondary school principalship in disadvantaged contexts. International Journal of Leadership in Education.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., Harris, A., Chapman, C., Stoll, L., & Russ, J. (2004). Improving schools in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas – A review of research evidence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(2), 149–157. doi:10.1076/sesi.15.2.149.30433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami, E., & Törnsen, M. (2017). Female secondary school. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 45(5), 806–824. doi:10.1177/1741143217717273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., & Torre, D. (2015). Vision: Essential scaffolding. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(2), 177–197. doi:10.1177/1741143214523017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musolf, G. (2003). The Chicago school. In L. Reynols & N. Hermnan–Kinney (Eds.), Handbook of simbolic interactionism (pp. 91–108). United States of America: Altamira.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Notman, R. (2017). Professional identities, adaptation and the self: Cases of New Zeland school principals during a time of change. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 45(5), 759–773. doi:10.1177/1741143216670650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, M., Netting, F., & Thomas, M. (2008). Grounded theory. Managins the challenge for those facin institutional review board oversight. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(1), 28–45. doi:10.1177/1077800407308907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, M., & Kiyimba, N. (2015). Advanced qualitative research. A guide to using theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). Equity and quality in education. Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Raihani, R., Gurr, D., & Drysdale, L. (2014). Indonesia – Leading an Islamic school in a multicultural setting in Indonesia. In C. Day & D. Gurr (Eds.), Leading school successfully. Stories from the field (pp. 184–193). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S. (2017). Transformation of professional identity in an experience primary school principal: A New Zeland case study. Educational Management, Adminstration & Leadership, 45(5), 774–789. doi:10.1177/17411143217707519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• School, A. (2016a). Proyecto Educativo de Centro. Documento Interno de Centro.
   Google Scholar
• School, D. (2016b). Proyecto Educativo de Centro. Documento Interno de Centro.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, C. (2003). Good intentions are not enough: Transformative leadership for communities of difference. Oxford: Scarecrow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basic of qualitative research. United States of America: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Theoharis, G. (2007). Social justice educational leaders and resistance: Towards a theory of social justice leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 221–258. doi:10.1177/0013161X06293717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres-Arcadia, C., & Flores-Kastanis, E. (2014). Mexico – from fragmentation to community: A journey of change. In C. Day & D. Gurr (Eds.), Leading school successfully. Stories from the field (pp. 31–43). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tubin, D. (2017). Leadership identity construction practices. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 45(5), 790–805. doi:10.1177/1741143216682503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vryant, K., Adler, A., & Adler, C. (2003). Identity. In L. Reynols & N. Hermnan –Kinney (Eds.), Handbook of simbolic interactionism (pp. 367–390). United States of America: Altamira.
   Google Scholar
• Wasonga, T. (2014). Kenya – From perdition to performance. In C. Day & D. Gurr (Eds.), Leading school successfully. Stories from the field (pp. 44–58). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weigert, A., & Gecas, V. (2003). Self. In L. Reynols & N. Hermnan –Kinney (Eds.), Handbook of simolic interactionism (pp. 267–288). United States of America: Altamira.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Leaarning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yakoov, O., & Tubin, D. (2014). The evolution of success. In C. Day & D. Gurr (Eds.), Leading school successfully. Stories from the field (pp. 19–30). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ylimaki, R., Gurr, D., & Drysdale, L. (2011). Sustainable improvement and leadership in challenging schools. In L. Mooss, O. Johansson, & C. Day (Eds.), How shcool principals sustain success over time (pp. 151–167). Dordrecht Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2011). Teaching and teacher emotion: A post-strcutural perspective. In C. Day & C. K. Lee (Eds.), New understanding of teacher’s work (pp. 31–42). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer- Science+Business Media B.V. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0545-6_3
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2014). The place of emotion in teacher reflection: Elias, Foucault and ‘critical emotional reflexivity’. Power and Education, 6(2), 210–222. doi:10.2304/power.2014.6.2.210
   Google Scholar