From Oversight to Advocacy: An Examination of School-Board Leadership

References

• Alsbury, T. (2015). A call for balance governance. In T. Alsbury & P. Gore (Eds.), Improving school board effectiveness: A balanced governance approach (pp. 3–14). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, P., & Osborne, R. (2010). School boards: Emerging governance challenges. Education Canada, 50(1), 46–49.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian School Boards Association. (1995). Who’s running our schools? Education governance in the 90s. Toronto, ON: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Carol, L., Cunningham, L., Danzberger, J., Kirst, M., McCloud, B., & Usdan, M. (1986). School boards: Strengthening grass roots leadership. Washington, DC: The Institute for Educational Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, L. (2013). Knowledge mobilization – From the web to the board table: How school board leaders use digital information to inform their decision making (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, J. (2006). Boards that make a difference: A new design for leadership in non-profit and public organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Danzberger, J. (1992). School boards: A troubled American institution. In The Twentieth Century Fund/Danforth Foundation (Ed.), Facing the challenge: The report of the twentieth century fund task force on school governance (pp. 19–124). New York, NY: The Twentieth Century Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Danzberger, J. (1994). Gcverning the nation’s schools: The case for restructuring local school boards. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(5), 367–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danzberger, J., & Usdan, M. (1994). Local education governance: Perspectives on problems and strategies for change. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(5), 366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2009). Conceptualizing policy implementation: Large-scale reform in an era of complexity. In G. Sykes & D. Plank (Eds.), AERA handbook on educational policy research (pp. 348–361). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Delagardelle, M. (2008). The lighthouse inquiry: Examining the role of school board leadership in the improvement of student achievement. In T. Alsbury (Ed.), The future of school board governance: Relevancy and revelation (pp. 191–223). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dibbon, D., Sheppard, B., & Brown, J. (2012). The impact of education reform on school board governance. In G. Galway & D. Dibbon (Eds.), Education reform: From rhetoric to reality (pp. 217–234). London, Ontario: The Althouse Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, D. (2010). The challenges of school district leadership. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Educational Commission of the States. (1999). Governing America’s schools: Changing the rules. Denver, CO: Report of the National Commission on Governing America’s Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Farkas, S., Foley, P., & Duffett, A. (2001). Just waiting to be asked: A fresh look at attitudes on public engagement. New York, NY: Public Agenda.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, T. (1997). Provincial initiatives to restructure Canadian school governance in the 1990s. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, T., & Hutton, B. (1997). School boards, district consolidation, and educational governance in British Columbia, 1872–1995. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M. R., & Ihrke, D. (2015). Do school board governance best practices improve district performance? Testing the key work of school boards in Wisconsin. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(2). doi:10.1080/01900692.2014.982293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredua-Kwarteng, E. (2005). School closures in Ontario: Who has the final say? Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 46, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Galway, G. (2012). Lessons in leadership: Insider perspectives on corporate managerialism and educational reform. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 130, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Garn, G., & Copeland, G. (2014). School board elections: Theories meet reality. Journal of School Leadership, 24, 4–31. doi:10.1177/105268461402400101
   Google Scholar
• Glaze, A. (2018). Raise the bar: A coherent and responsive education administrative system for Nova Scotia. Retrieved from https://www.ednet.ns.ca/sites/default/files/docs/raisethebar-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, R., Fulbright, L., & Zimmerman, W. (1997). Getting therefrom here. School board-superintendent collaboration: Creating a school governance team capable of raising student achievement. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service & New England School Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, R., & Zimmerman, W. (2000). Thinking differently: Recommendations for 21st century school board/superintendent leadership, governance, and teamwork for high student achievement. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Grady, M., & Bryant, M. (1991). School board turmoil and superintendent turnover. What Pushes Them to the Brink? the School Administrator, 48, 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. (2014). Is discord detrimental? Using institutional variation to identify the impact of public governing board conflict on outcomes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 289–315. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, F., & Meeks, O. (2010). School boards circa 2010: Governance in the accountability era. Alexandria, VA: National School Boards Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hightower, A., Knapp, M., Marsh, J., & McLaughlin, M. (2002). The district role in instructional renewal: Setting the stage for dialogue. In A. Hightower, M. Knapp, J. Marsh, & M. McLaughlin (Eds.), School districts and instructional renewal (pp. 193–201). New York, NY: Teachers College.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, P., Warner-King, K., Campbell, C., McElroy, M., & Munoz-Colon, I. (2002). Big city school boards: Problems and options. Seattle, WA: Center for Reinventing Public Education.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, M., & Coburn, C. (2008). Evidence-based decision making in school district central offices: Toward a policy and research agenda. Educational Policy, 22(4), 578–608. doi:10.1177/0895904807307067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannacone, L., & Lutz, F. (1994). The crucible of democracy: The local arena. Politics of Education Association Yearbook, 9, 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Key, V. (1949). Southern politics in state and nation. New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Kirst, M. (1994). A changing context means school board reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(5), 378–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kofod, K. K., Paulsen, J. M., Johansson, O., Pulkkinen, S., & Kanervio, P. (2014). The school boards between power and influence. In L. Moos & J. Paulsen (Eds.), School boards in the governance process (pp. 117–133). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalski, T. (2001). The future of local district governance: Implications for board members and superintendents. In C. Brunner & L. Bjork (Eds.), Advances in research and theories of school management and educational policy. Volume 6: The new superintendency (pp. 183–203). New York, NY: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalski, T. (2008). School reform, civic engagement, and school board leadership. In T. L. Alsbury (Ed.), The future of school board governance: Relevancy and revelation (pp. 225–243). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
   Google Scholar
• Land, D. (2002). Local school boards under review: Their role and effectiveness in relation to students’ academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 229–278. doi:10.3102/00346543072002229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. (2010). Introduction to new evidence on district effects. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9, 243–244. doi:10.1080/15700761003731526
   Google Scholar
• MacLellan, D. (2007). The fewer school boards act and the Toronto district school board: Educational restructuring 1997–2003. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
   Google Scholar
• McGonagill, G. (1987). Board/staff partnership: The key to the effectiveness ofstate and local boards. Phi Delta Kappan, 69(1), 65–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. (2010). Accountability policy implementation and the case of smaller school district capacity: Three contrasting cases that examine the flow and use of NCLB accountability data. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(4), 384–420. doi:10.1080/15700760903342350
   Google Scholar
• Moos, L. (2009). Hard and soft governance: The journey from transnational agencies to school leadership. European Educational Research Journal, 8(3), 397–406. doi:10.2304/eerj.2009.8.3.397
   Google Scholar
• Moos, L. (Ed.). (2013). Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership – Is there a Nordic model? Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moos, L., Paulsen, J. M., Nihlfors, E., Kanervio, P., & Pulkkinen, S. (2014). Educational governance: Politics, administration and professionalism. In L. Moos & J. Paulsen (Eds.), School boards in the governance process (pp. 87–100). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. (2006). Respect for Ontario school trustees. Retrieved from https://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/general/elemsec/partnership/trustees.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. (2010). Operational review guide for Ontario district school boards (4th ed.). Toronto, ON: Ontario Ministry of Education. Retrieved from https://sbsb.edu.gov.on.ca/VDIR1/Operational%20Reviews/Guides.aspx?Link=OP
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Public School Boards’ Association (OPSBA). (2014). What do trustees do? Retrieved from http://elections.ontarioschooltrustees.org/en/about-trustees/what-trustees-do.html
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. (2010). The (new) public governance: A suitable case for treatment? In S. Osborne (Ed.), The new public governance (pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pickup, M. (2015). Report of the auditor general to the nova scotia house of assembly. Halifax: Auditor General of Nova Scotia.
   Google Scholar
• Provenzo, E. (2008). Nineteenth century school boards. Educational Studies, 43, 278–279. doi:10.1080/00131940802117944
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. (2010). Why public schools need democratic governance. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(6), 24–27. doi:10.1177/003172171009100607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, M. (1999). Effective school governance: A look at today’s practice and tomorrow’s promise. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
   Google Scholar
• Rushowy, K., & Brown, L. (2015, January 22). Tough assignment for Toronto trustees. The Toronto Star, GT4.
   Google Scholar
• Saatcioglu, A., Moore, S., Sargut, G., & Bajaj, A. (2011). The role of school board social capital in district governance: Effects on financial and academic outcomes. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10, 1–42. doi:10.1080/15700760903511780
   Google Scholar
• Sattler, P. (2012). Education governance reform in Ontario: Neoliberalism in context. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 128, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Seel, K., & Gibbons, J. (2011). Interviews with school board chairs: Perspectives on governance. Edmonton, AB: Alberta School Boards Association.
   Google Scholar
• Shaub, M., Collins, F., Holzmann, O., & Lowensohn, S. (2005). Self-interest vs. concern for others: What’s the impact on management accountants’ ethical decisions? Strategic Finance, 86(9), 41–45.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, B., Brown, J., & Dibbon, D. (2009). School district leadership matters. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, B., Galway, G., Brown, J., & Wiens, J. (2013). School boards matter: Report of the pan-Canadian study of school district governance. Montreal, QC: Canadian School Boards Association.
   Google Scholar
• Skott, P. (2014). School boards and superintendents doing local curriculum work: Conflict or successful cooperation? International Journal of Educational Management, 28(7), 842–855.
   Google Scholar
• Stover, D. (2009). Out of control: A school board’s self-destructive path to failure offers others some valuable lessons. American School Board Journal, 196(3), 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• The Twentieth Century Fund. (1992). Facing the challenge: The report of the Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on school governance. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Trujillo, T. (2012). The disproportionate erosion of local control: Urban school boards, high-stakes accountability, and democracy. Educational Policy, 27(2), 334–359. doi:10.1177/0895904812465118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban, W., & Wagoner, J. (1996). American education: A history. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. (1992). The case for local education policy boards. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(3), 228–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, N., DiCecco, R., Roher, E., Rosenbluth, E. K., & Wolfish, A. (2004). Educational governance: A look at the landscape. Toronto, ON: The Learning Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2015). Review of the Toronto district school board. Retrieved from https://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/new/2015/TDSBReview2015.pdf
   Google Scholar