Recognizing LEA Officials’ Translator Competences When Implementing New Policy Directives for Documentation of Schools’ Systematic Quality Work

References

• Addi-Raccah, A., & Gavish, Y. (2010). The LEA’s role in a decentralized school system: The school principals’ view. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 38(2), 184–201. doi:10.1177/1741143209356361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adolfsson, C.-H., & Alvunger, D. (2020). Power dynamics and policy actions in the changing landscape of local school governance. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(2), 128–142. doi:10.1080/20020317.2020.1745621
   Google Scholar
• Adolfsson, C.-H., & Håkansson, J. (2021). Data analysis for school improvement within coupled local school systems: Which data and with what purposes? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1–14. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/15700763.2021.2010101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. E. (2006). The school district’s role in educational change. International Journal of Educational Reform, 15(1), 13–37. doi:10.1177/105678790601500102
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E., & Young, M. D. (2018). If they knew then what we know now, why haven’t things changed? An examination of district effectiveness research. Frontiers in Education, 3(87), 1–20. doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00087
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C., & Murillo, F. J. (2005). Big change question. Do local central authorities (Lcas) make a difference in school reform? Journal of Educational Change, 6(1), 77–89. doi:10.1007/s10833-004-7785-1
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C. (2019). From hierarchies to networks: Possibilities and pitfalls for educational reform of the middle tier. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(5), 554–570. doi:10.1108/JEA-12-2018-0222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2006). Framing the problem of reading instruction: Using frame analysis to uncover the microprocesses of policy implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 343–349. doi:10.3102/00028312043003343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2005). En teori om organisering [A theory of organizing]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B., & Sevón, G. (2005). Global ideas. How ideas, objects and practices travel in the global economy. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). Thick descriptions: Towards an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures (pp. 3–30). New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Greany, T. (2022). Place-based governance and leadership in decentralized school systems: Evidence from England. Journal of Educational Policy, 37(2), 247–268. doi:10.1080/02680939.2020.1792554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson, J., & Adolfsson, C.-H. (2022). Local education authority’s quality management within a coupled school system: Strategies, actions, and tensions. Journal of Educational Change, 23(3), 291–314. doi:10.1007/s10833-021-09414-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (2012). Managementbyråkrati - organisationspolitisk makt i svensk offentlig förvaltning [Management bureaucracy - organizational policy power in Swedish public administration]. Malmö: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Hanberger, A., Lindgren, L., & Lundström, U. (2016). Navigating the evaluation web: Evaluation in Swedish local school governance. Education Inquiry, 7(3), 259–281. doi:10.3402/edui.v7.29913
   Google Scholar
• Henriksen, Ø., & Aas, M. (2021). Enhancing system thinking—A superintendent and three principals reflecting with a critical friend. Educational Action Research, 29(5), 804–819. doi:10.1080/09650792.2020.1724813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I. (2006). Street-level bureaucracy revisited: Frontline district central-office administrators as boundary spanners in education policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(4), 357–383. doi:10.3102/01623737028004357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I. (2008). District central offices as learning organizations: How sociocultural and organizational learning theories elaborate district central office administrators’ participation in teaching and learning improvement efforts. American Journal of Education, 114(4), 627–664. doi:10.1086/589317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I. (2012). District central office leadership as teaching: How central office administrators support principals’ development as instructional leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 733–774. doi:10.1177/0013161X12443258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I., & Venkateswaran, N. (2012). School–central office relationships in evidence use: Understanding evidence use as a systems problem. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 199–222. doi:10.1086/663282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooge, E. H., Moolenaar, N. M., van Look, K. C. J., Janssen, S. K., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2019). The role of district leaders for organization social capital. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(3), 296–316. doi:10.1108/JEA-03-2018-0045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, C., & Colebourne, D. (2004). Managing the performance of staff in LEAs in Wales. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 32(1), 45–65. doi:10.1177/1741143204039299
   Google Scholar
• King Smith, A., Watkins, K. E., & Han, S.-H. (2020). From silos to solutions: How one district is building a culture of collaboration and learning between school principals and central office leaders. European Journal of Education, 55(1), 58–75. doi:10.1111/ejed.12382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. (2010). Characteristics of school districts that are exceptionally effective in closing the achievement gap. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(3), 245–291. doi:10.1080/15700761003731500
   Google Scholar
• Liljenberg, M., & Andersson, K. (2021). Relations between an improving Swedish LEA and school principals with joint quality and improvement responsibilities. Education Inquiry, 12(2), 147–162. doi:10.1080/20004508.2020.1802851
   Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S., Prøitz, T. S., & Skedsmo, G. (2018). Elevresultater. Mellom kontroll og utvikling [Students’ results. Between control and development]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, A. M. (2019). Interpretation and translation in policy implementation. EasyChair Preprint No. 1082. Draft paper presented at the Public Management Research Conference, 11-14 June 2019, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. https://easychair.org/publications/preprint/Tp6g
   Google Scholar
• Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., & Paulsen, J. M. (Eds.). (2016). Nordic superintendents: Agents in a Broken Chain. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., Chapman, C., Ainscow, M., & West, M. (2011). Collaboration and networking in education. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2015). Improving schools in Sweden: An OECD perspective. OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/Improving-Schools-in-Sweden.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Prøitz, T. S., Mausethagen, S., & Skedsmo, G. (2021). District administrators’ governing styles in the enactment of data-use practices. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 24(2), 244–265. doi:10.1080/13603124.2018.1562097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorrer, A. K., Skrla, L., & Scheurich, J. J. (2008). Districts as institutional actors in educational reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(3), 307–358. doi:10.1177/0013161X08318962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røvik, K. A. (2002). The secrets of the winners: Management ideas that flow. In K. Sahlin-Andersson & L. Engwall (Eds.), The expansion of management knowledge: Carriers, flows and sources (pp. 113–144). Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Røvik, K. A. (2008). Managementsamhället. Trender och idéer på 2000-talet [The management society. Trends and ideas in the 21st century]. Malmö: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Røvik, K. A. (2016). Knowledge transfer as translation: Review and elements of an instrumental theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3), 290–310. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests and identities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• SFS 2010:800. Skollagen [The Education Act]. Stockholm, Sweden: Utbildningsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Skolinspektionen. (2014). Från huvudmannen till klassrummet – Tät styrkedja viktig för förbättrade kunskapsresultat (Dnr. 2014: 6739) [From the local education authority to the classroom – Tight steering chain important for improved results]. Stockholm: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Tournier, B., Chimier, C., & Jones, C. (Eds.). (2023). Leading teaching and learning together. The role of the middle tier. Education Development Trust and IIEP-UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000384504/PDF/384504eng.pdf.multi
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Grootenboer, P., & Kemmis, S. (2019). District offices fostering educational change through instructional leadership practices in Australian catholic secondary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(5), 501–518. doi:10.1108/JEA-09-2018-0179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research. Design and methods (4th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar